This paper examines the interface between Henry Kissinger's operational code and his bargaining behavior during the Vietnam conflict. Kissinger's position at the pinnacle of the American foreign affairs hierarchy, amidst the existence of competing policy recommendations, may be regarded as necessary conditions to test the impact of his operational code upon American foreign policy. A comparison of his academic writings and his conduct of the Vietnam negotiations reveals a congruent relationship between his operational code and his bargaining behavior. Taken collectively, the code's components approximate game theory's “prisoner's dilemma” description of politics and specify a “general preference relation” that prescribes a consistent, predictable, metagame repertoire of responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALLISON, G. (1971) Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
2.
ALLISON, G. and M. HALPERIN (1972) “Bureaucratic politics: a paradigm and some policy implications, ” pp. 40–79 in R. Tanter and R. Ullman (eds.) Theory and Policy in International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.
3.
AXELROD, R. (1971) “Psycho-algebra: a mathematical theory of cognition and choice with an application to the British Eastern Committee in 1918.”Peace Research Society (International) Papers18: 113–131.
4.
AZAR, E., R. BRODY, and C. McCLELLAND (1972) International Events Interaction Analysis. London & Beverly Hills: Sage.
5.
BRANDON, H. (1973) Retreat from Power. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
6.
BRAVER, S. and B. BARNETT (1974) “Perception of opponent's motives and cooperation in a mixed-motive game.”J. of Conflict Resolution18 (December): 686–699.
7.
Bulletin, The Department of State (1973) “Texts of agreement and protocols.” 68 (February 12): 169–188.
8.
BURD, F. (1975) “World order as a final cause in the foreign policy of Henry Kissinger.” Prepared for the International Studies Association meeting, Washington, D.C.
9.
CROCKER, C. (1976) “The impact of Henry Kissinger on the institutions of foreign policy.” Prepared for the International Studies Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.
10.
De RIVERA, J. (1968) The Psychological Dimension of Foreign Policy. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
11.
DESTLER, I. (1971) “Can one man do?”Foreign Policy5 (Winter): 28–40.
12.
ELDRIDGE, A. (1976) “The crisis of authority: the president, Kissinger and Congress, 1969–1974.” Prepared for the International Studies Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.
13.
ELDRIDGE, A. (1975) “Pondering intangibles: a value analysis of Henry Kissinger.” Prepared for a symposium, “The Theory and Practice of Henry Kissinger's Statesmanship, ” at College Park, Maryland (September): 1–50.
14.
GARNER, K. and M. DEUTSCH (1974) “Cooperative behavior in dyads: effects of dissimilar goal orientations and differing expectations about the partner.”J. of Conflict Resolution18 (December): 634–645.
15.
GEORGE, A. (1972) “The case for multiple advocacy in making foreign policy.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.66 (September): 751–785.
16.
GEORGE, A. (1969) “The operational code.”Int. Studies Q.13 (June): 190–222.
17.
GLAD, B. (1973) “Contributions of psychobiography, ” pp. 296–321 in J. Knutson (ed.) Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
GRAUBARD, S. (1973) Kissinger: Portrait of a Mind. New York: W. W. Norton.
19.
GREENSTEIN, F. (1969) Personality and Politics. Chicago: Markham.
20.
HALPERIN, M. (1963) Limited War in the Nuclear Age. New York: John Wiley.
21.
HERMANN, C. (1972) “Policy classification: a key to the comparative study of foreign policy, ” pp. 58–79 in J. Rosenau, V. Davis, and M. East (eds.) The Analysis of International Politics. New York: Free Press.
22.
HERMANN, C. (1971) “What is a foreign policy event?” pp. 295–321 in W. Hanrieder (ed.) Comparative Foreign Policy. New York: David McKay.
23.
HOLSTI, O. (1975) “Foreign policy decision-makers viewed psychologically.” Prepared for the American Political Science Association meeting, San Francisco, California.
24.
HOWARD, N. (1971) Paradoxes of Rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
25.
HOWARD, N. (1968a) “Metagame analysis of Vietnam policy.”Peace Research Society (International) Papers10: 126–142.
26.
HOWARD, N. (1968b) “A method for metagame analysis of political problems.”Peace Research Society (International) Papers9: 48–67.
27.
JACKSON, R. (1973) “Patterns of political interaction: reciprocity and coercion.”Int. Studies Q.17 (December): 445–470.
28.
KAHN, H. (1965) On Escalation. New York: Praeger.
29.
KALB, M. and B. KALB (1974) Kissinger. Boston: Little, Brown.
30.
KAUFMAN, W. (1964) The McNamara Strategy. New York: Harper & Row.
31.
KEGLEY, C. (1973) A General Empirical Typology of Foreign Policy Behavior. Beverly Hills: Sage.
32.
KISSINGER, H. (1974) American Foreign Policy (expanded revised edition). New York: W. W. Norton.
33.
KISSINGER, H. (1973) “Dr. Kissinger's news conference, January 24.”Dept. of State Bull.68 (February 12): 155–169.
34.
KISSINGER, H. (1969a) American Foreign Policy. New York: W. W. Norton.
35.
KISSINGER, H. (1969b) “The Vietnam negotiations.” 47 Foreign Affairs (January): 211–234.
36.
KISSINGER, H. (1968) “The white revolutionary.”Daedalus97 (Summer): 888–924.
37.
KISSINGER, H. (1966) The Troubled Partnership. New York: Doubleday.
38.
KISSINGER, H. (1962) The Necessity for Choice. New York: Doubleday.
39.
KISSINGER, H. (1957a) Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper.
40.
KISSINGER, H. (1957b) A World Restored. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
41.
KISSINGER, H. (n.d.) The Meaning of History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Archives.
42.
LANDAU, D. (1972) Kissinger. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
43.
LEACACOS, J. (1971–1972) “Kissinger's apparat.”Foreign Policy5 (Winter): 3–27.
44.
LEITES, N. (1953) A Study of Bolshevism. New York: Free Press.
45.
LEITES, N. (1951) The Operational Code of the Politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McGOWAN, P. and H. SHAPIRO (1973) The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy. Beverly Hills: Sage.
48.
MUSHAKOJI, K. (1972) “The strategies of negotiation, ” pp. 109–131 in J. A. La Ponce and Paul Smoker (eds.) Experimentation and Simulation in Political Science. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
49.
NAGEL, E. (1961) The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
50.
NEWHOUSE, J. (1973) Cold Dawn: The Story of SALT. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
51.
NIXON, R. (1973) “Address by President Nixon, January 23.”Dept. of State Bulletin68 (February 12): 153–155.
52.
NIXON, R. (1972) “Denying Hanoi the means to continue aggression.”Dept. of State Bull.66 (May 29): 747–750.
53.
NIXON, R. (1970) U.S. Foreign Policy for the 1970's.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
54.
NIXON, R. (1967) “Asia after Vietnam.”Foreign Affairs46 (October): 111–125.
55.
PAIGE, G. (1968) The Korean Decision. New York: Free Press.
56.
PERLMUTTER, A. (1975) “Crisis management: Kissinger's middle east negotiations.”Int. Studies Q.19 (September): 316–343.
57.
POPPER, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
58.
RAPOPORT, A. (1964) Strategy and Conscience. New York: Harper & Row.
59.
RAPOPORT, A. and A. CHAMMAH (1966) “The game of chicken.”Amer. Behavioral Scientist10 (November): 10–14, 23–28.
60.
RAPOPORT, A. (1965) Prisoner's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
61.
RESTON, J. (1974) “Partial transcript of an interview with Kissinger on the state of the western world.” New York Times (October 13): 34–35.
62.
SAWYER, J. and H. GUETZKOW (1965) “Bargaining and negotiations in international relations, ” pp. 464–520 in H. Kelman (ed.) International Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
63.
SCHELLING, T. (1968) “Notes on policies, games, metagames, and Vietnam.”Peace Research Society (International) Papers10: 143–147.
64.
SCHELLING, T. (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
65.
SCHELLING, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
66.
SHAPIRO, M. and G. M. BONHAM (1973) “Cognitive process and foreign policy decision-making.”Int. Studies Q.17 (June): 147–174.
67.
SMITH, M. B. (1968) “A map for the analysis of personality and politics.”J. of Social Issues24 (July): 15–28.
68.
SNYDER, G. (1971) ‘“Prisoner's dilemma’ and ‘chicken’ models in international politics.”Int. Studies Q.15 (March): 66–103.
69.
SNYDER, R., H. W. BRUCK, and B. SAPIN (1962) Foreign Policy Decision-Making. New York: Free Press.
70.
SZULC, T. (1974) “Behind the Vietnam cease-fire.”Foreign Policy15 (Summer): 21–69.
71.
TERHUNE, K. (1974) ‘“Wash-in, ’ ‘wash-out, ’ and systemic effects in extended prisoner's dilemma.”J. of Conflict Resolution18 (December): 656–685.
72.
TWERASER, K. (1974) Changing Patterns of Political Beliefs: The Foreign Policy Operational Codes of J. William Fulbright, 1943–1967.Beverly Hills: Sage.
73.
VINCENT, J. and E. SCHWERIN (1971) “Ratios of force and escalation in a game situation.”J. of Conflict Resolution15 (December): 489–512.
74.
WALKER, S. (1975) “Cognitive maps and international realities.” Prepared for the American Political Science Association meeting, San Francisco, California.
75.
WARD, D. (1975) “Kissinger: a psycho-history.”History of Childhood Q.2 (Winter): 287–348.
