It is shown that altruism is not, in general, sufficient to reduce the area of contention between two actors. Altruism can reduce or eliminate contention, leave it unchanged, or lead to a new form of contention, a contest in beneficence. Which result obtains is an empirical question. Several recent applications of the assumption of altruism are summarized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BECKER, G. (1974a) “A theory of marriage: part II.”J. of Pol. Economy82, 2: 511–526.
2.
BECKER, G. (1974b) “A theory of social interactions.”J. of Pol. Economy82, 6: 1063–1093.
3.
BOULDING, K. (1973) The Economy of Love and Fear. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
4.
BRENNAN, G. (1973) “Pareto optimal distribution: the case of malice and envy.”J. of Public Economics.
5.
BROWN, C., G. FANE, and J. MEDOFF (1973) “The income distribution as a pure public good: comment.”Q. J. of Economics87, 2: 304–310.
6.
CANTERBERY, E. and H. TUCKMAN (1973) “The income distribution as a pure public good: comment.”Q. J. of Economics87, 2: 304–310.
7.
CODERE, H. (1950) Fighting With Property: A Study of Kwakiutl Warfare 1792–1930. New York: J. J. Augustin.
8.
DE ALESSI, L. (1975) “Toward an analysis of postdisaster cooperation.”Amer. Econ. Rev.65: 127–138.
9.
DE ALESSI, L. (1968) “The utility of disasters.”Kyklos21: 525–532.
10.
DE ALESSI, L. (1967) “A utility analysis of post-disaster cooperation.”Papers in Non-Market Decision Making3: 85–90.
11.
DOUTY, C. (1972) “Disasters and charity: some aspects of cooperative economic behavior.”Amer. Econ. Rev.62, 4: 580–590.
12.
FISHER, I. (1937) Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, (reprint of 1892 edition)
13.
FITZGERALD, B. (1975) “Notes on the grants economy of foreign aid.”J. of Peace Sci.1, 2: 131–140.
14.
FREY, B. (1975) “Weapons exports and aid to developing countries.”J. of Peace Sci.1, 2: 117–126.
15.
FROHLICH, N. (1974) “Self-interest or altruism: what difference?”J. of Conflict Resolution18: 55–73.
