Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz .Decisions and nondecisions: an analytical framework , A merican Polrtrcal Sctence Review, 1963 , 57, 632-42.
2.
Baldwm, David A.The power of positive sanctions, World Politics, in press.
3.
Blau, Peter M.Exchange and Power in Social LifeNew York: Wiley, 1964.
4.
Boulding, Kenneth E.Towards a pure theory of threat systems, American Economic Review, 1963, 53, 424-34.
5.
Brody, Richard A.Deterrence. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences . New York: Free Press , 1968, vol. 4, pp. 130-33.
6.
Cartwright, Dorwin.Influence, leadership, control. In James G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp. 1-47.
7.
Dahl, Robert A.Modern Political AnalysisEnglewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall, 1963.
8.
Deutsch, Karl W.The Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968 .
9.
French, John R. P., and Bertram Raven.The bases of social power. In Dorwin Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social PowerAnn Arbor: University of Michigan, 1959, pp. 150-67.
10.
Galtung, Johan.On the meaning of nonviolence, Journal of Peace Research , 1965, 2, 228-57.
11.
—. On the effects of international economic sanctions, with examples from the case of Rhodesia, World Politics, 1967, 19, 378-416.
12.
Gamson, William A.Power and DrscontentHomewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1968.
13.
Jervis, Robert.The Logic of Images in International RelationsPrinceton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.
14.
Lazarus, Richard S.Stress. In International Encyclopedia of the Social SciencesNew York: Free Press, 1968, vol. 15, pp. 337-48.
15.
Lieberman, E. James.Threat and assurance in the conduct of conflict. In Roger Fisher (ed.), International Conflict and Behavioral ScienceNew York: Basic Books, 1964, pp. 110-22.
16.
Milburn, Thomas W.What constitutes effective deterrence?, Journal of ConJlict Resolution, 1959, 3, 138-45.
17.
Nagel, Jack H.Some questions about the concept of power, Behavioral Science , 1968, 13, 129-37.
18.
Pruitt, Dean G.National power and international responsiveness, Background , 1964, 7, 165-78.
19.
—. Definition of the situation as a determinant of international action . In Herbert C. Kelman (ed.), International Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965, pp. 393-432.
20.
Sawyer, Jack, and Harold Guetzkow .Bargaimng and negotiation in international relations . In Herbert C. Kelman (ed.), International BehaviorNew York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965, pp.466-520.
21.
Schelling, Thomas C.The Strategy of ConflictCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.
22.
—. War without pain and other models, World Politics , 1963, 15, 465-87.
23.
—. Arms and InfluenceNew Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1966.
24.
Singer, J. David.Threat-perception and the armament-tension dilemma, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1958, 2, 90-105.
25.
—. Inter-nation influence: a formal model, American Political Science Review, 1963, 57, 420-30.
26.
Snyder, Glenn H.Deterrence and power, Journal of Conflict Resolution , 1960, 4, 163-78.