Alker, Hayward, and Bruce Russett.World Politics in the General AssemblyNew Haven: Yale University Press, 1965.
2.
Deutsch, Karl W.Recent trends in research methods in political science. In James Charlesworth (ed.), A Design for Political SciencePhiladelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science (December, 1966), pp. 149-78.
3.
Holsti, Ole R.The belief system and national images: a case study, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1962, 6 (Sept.), 244-52.
4.
—. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and HumanitiesReading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
5.
Holsti, Ole R., Richard Brody, and Robert North.Measuring affect and action in international reaction models: empirical materials from the 1962 Cuban Crisis, Journal of Peace Research, 1964, 1, 170-89.
6.
Jervis, Robert.The costs of the quantitative study of international relations. In Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International PoliticsPrinceton: Princeton University Press, 1969, pp. 177-217.
7.
Lamborn, Alan.Wright, Rummel and Lewin: field theoretic approaches in political science and social psychology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Department of Political Science, 1971, mimeo.
8.
McClelland, Charles A.Field theory and system theory in international politics. University of Southern California (June 1968 ), mimeo., 25 pp.
9.
Namenwirth, J.Z., and Thomas L. Brewer.Elite editonal comment on the European and Atlantic communities in four countries. In Philip J. Stone et al (eds.), The General InquirerCambridge. MIT Press, 1966, pp. 401-29.
10.
North, Robert C.Research pluralism and the international elephant. In Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Politics . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969, pp. 21842.
11.
Rosenau, James N.Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In R. B. Farrell (ed.), Approaches to Comparative and International PoliticsEvanston : Northwestern University Press, 1966, pp. 52 71.
12.
Rummel, Rudolph.A field theory of social action with application to conflict within nations , General Systems Yearbook, 1965, pp. 183211.
13.
Singer, J. D. (ed.). Human Behavior and International Politics Contributions from the Social-Psychological SciencesChicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
14.
Smith, M.S., et al A content analysis of twenty presidential nomination acceptance speeches. In Philip J. Stone et al (eds.), The General InquirerCambridge: MIT Press, 1966, pp. 359-400.
15.
Sprout, Harold, and Margaret S. Sprout.Environmental factors in the study of international politics. In James N. Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy A Reader in Research and TheoryGlencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1961, pp. 106119.
16.
Tanter, Raymond.Dimensions of conflict behavior within and between nations, 1958-1960 , Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1966, 10 (March), 41-65.
17.
Webb, E.J., et al Unobtrusive MeasuresChicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
18.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan.Domestic and foreign conflict behavior of nations, Journal of Peace Research, 1968, 5, 57-68.
19.
Wright, Quincy.A Study of WarChicago: Umversity of Chicago Press, 1942, 1965.
20.
—. The Study of Internaironal RelationsNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955.
21.
—. Design for a research project on international conflict and the factors causing their aggravation or amelioration, Western Political Quarterly , 1957, 10, 26375.
