A comparison of interpreted and abstract versions of mixed-motive games

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bierman, Harold, Jr. , et al. Quantitative Analysis for Business Decisions. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1965.

Bixenstine, V.E. , N. Chambers , and K.V. Wilson. Effect of asymmetry of payoff on behavior in a two-person, non-zero-sum game, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1964, 8 (2, June), 151-59.

Bixenstine, V.E. , H. Potash , and K.V. Wilson. Effects of level of cooperative choice by the other player on choices in a Prisoner's Dilemma game, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963,66,308-13.

Deutsch, M. Trust, trustworthiness and the F-scale, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 138-40.

Lindquist, E.F. Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1956.

Morehous, L.G. One-play, two-play, five-play and ten-play runs of the Prisoner's Dilemma , Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1966, 10, 345-62.

Orwant, Carol J. Unpublished MA Thesis, Drake University, August 1968.

Oskamp, S. , and D. Perlman. Factors affecting cooperation in a Prisoner's Dilemma game , Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1965 , 9, 359-74.

Rapoport, A. , and A. Chammah. The Prisoner's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.

10.

Rapoport, A. , M. Shubik , and R. Thrall. Editorial introduction to gaming section, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1965, 9 (1, March), 66-67.

11.

Scodel, A. Induced collaboration in some non-zero sum games, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1962, 6 (4, Dec.), 335-40.