This article develops a new theory of how a strong target regime can (partially) deter a sender from imposing sanctions over major issues. We develop a formal theoretic framework to show that, following a sender’s sanction threat, a strong target regime can signal its strength by deliberately weakening itself through always sharing power with a domestic opposition, while a weak target regime mixes between sharing and not sharing power with the opposition. The strategy offers the sender a better assessment of a target’s strength, enabling it to adjust its sanction policy accordingly and avoid the costs of a potentially ineffective sanction over a strong target regime. As a result, a strong target regime will be sanctioned with a lower probability than a weak one.
AkotoWilliamPetersonTimothy M.ThiesCameron G.. 2020. “Trade Composition and Acquiescence to Sanction Threats.” Political Research Quarterly73 (3): 526-39.
2.
BensonBrett V.AdamMeirowitzRamsayKristopher W.. 2014. “Inducing Deterrence Through Moral Hazard in Alliance Contracts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (2): 307-35.
3.
ClayK. Chad. 2018. “Threat by Example: Economic Sanctions and Global Respect for Human Rights.” Journal of Global Security Studies3 (2): 133-49.
4.
CoeAndrew J. 2011. Costly Peace: A New Rationalist Explanation for War. Harvard University. Unpublished article.
5.
CrabtreeJohn. 1993. “The Peruvian Congressional Elections of 1992.” Electoral Studies12 (3): 264-67.
6.
CrawfordVincent P.JoelSobel. 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 1431-51.
7.
DreznerDaniel W. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge University Press. Number 65.
8.
DreznerDaniel W. 2003. “The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion.” International Organization57 (3): 643-59.
9.
DruryA. CooperLiYitan. 2006. “US Economic Sanction Threats Against China: failing to Leverage Better Human Rights.” Foreign Policy Analysis2 (4): 307-24.
10.
EatonJonathanEngersMaxim. 1999. “Sanctions: Some Simple Analytics.” The American Economic Review89 (2): 409-14.
11.
Escribà-FolchAbelWrightJosephWrightJoseph George. 2015. Foreign Pressure and the Politics of Autocratic Survival. Oxford Studies in Democratization.
12.
FangSongyingJohnsonJesse C.LeedsBrett Ashley. 2014. “To Concede or to Resist? the Restraining Effect of Military Alliances.” International Organization68 (4): 775-809.
13.
GilbertSteven. 2008. The US Policy of Democracy Promotion in Latin America. Bachelor’s thesis, Eastern Michigan University.
14.
GreenBrendan RittenhouseLongAustin. 2019. “Conceal or Reveal? Managing Clandestine Military Capabilities in Peacetime Competition.” International Security44 (3): 48-83.
15.
HufbauerGary ClydeSchottJeffrey J.ElliottKimberly Ann. 2007. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. 3rd ed.Peterson Institute.
16.
HultmanLisaPeksenDursun. 2017. “Successful or Counterproductive Coercion? the Effect of International Sanctions on Conflict Intensity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (6): 1315-39.
17.
LacyDeanNiouEmerson MS. 2004. “A Theory of Economic Sanctions and Issue Linkage: the Roles of Preferences, Information, and Threats.” The Journal of Politics66 (1): 25-42.
18.
LangloisCatherine C.LangloisJean-Pierre P.. 2010. “Costly Inference: a Game Theoretic Analysis of Sanctions.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy16 (1): 1-34.
19.
LevitskySteven. 1999. “Latin America’s Imperiled Progress: Fujimori and Post-party Politics in Peru.” Journal of Democracy10 (3): 78-92.
20.
McClintockCynthia. 2000. The United States and Peru in the 1990s: Cooperation with a Critical Caveat on Democratic Standards. George Washington University Working Paper.
21.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair. 2018. Punishing the Prince: A Theory of Interstate Relations, Political Institutions, and Leader Change. Princeton University Press.
22.
MeiYu. 2024. “Leader-Contingent Sanctions as a Cause of Violent Political Conflict.” Political Science Research and Methods13 (1).
23.
MengAnne. 2020. Constraining Dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
24.
MengAnne. 2021. “Winning the Game of Thrones: Leadership Succession in Modern Autocracies.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (5): 950-81.
25.
MengAnnePaineJack. 2022. “Power Sharing and Authoritarian Stability: How Rebel Regimes Solve the Guardianship Dilemma.” American Political Science Review116 (4): 1208-25.
26.
MorganT. CliftonBapatNavinKrustevValentin. 2009. “The Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions, 1971—2000.” Conflict Management and Peace Science26 (1): 92-10.
27.
NaderAlireza. 2013. “Rouhani’s Election: Regime Retrenchment in the Face of Pressure.” In Testimony Submitted Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT394.html.
28.
NjeruJames. 2003. The Impact of Foreign Aid on Public Expenditure: The Case of Kenya. AERC Research Paper 135 African Economic Research Consortium.
29.
NooruddinIrfan. 2002. “Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy.” International Interactions28 (1): 59-5.
30.
OechslinManuel. 2014. “Targeting Autocrats: Economic Sanctions and Regime Change.” European Journal of Political Economy36: 24-4.
31.
ReichNoam. 2022. “Signaling Strength with Handicaps.” Journal of Conflict Resolution66 (7-8): 1481-1513.
SmithAlastair. 1995. “Alliance Formation and War.” International Studies Quarterly39 (4): 405-25.
34.
SpanielWilliamSmithBradley C. 2015. “Sanctions, Uncertainty, and Leader Tenure.” International Studies Quarterly59 (4): 735-49.
35.
TragerRobert F.2015. “Diplomatic Signaling Among Multiple States.” The Journal of Politics77 (3): 635-47.
36.
TsebelisGeorge. 1990. “Are Sanctions Effective? A Game-Theoretic Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution34 (1): 3-28.
37.
Von SoestChristianWahmanMichael. 2015. “Not all Dictators are Equal: Coups, Fraudulent Elections, and the Selective Targeting of Democratic Sanctions.” Journal of Peace Research52 (1): 17-3.
38.
WolfordScott. 2014. “Showing Restraint, Signaling Resolve: Coalitions, Cooperation, and Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 144-56.
WoodReed M. 2008. ““A Hand upon the Throat of the Nation”: Economic Sanctions and State Repression, 1976-2001.” International Studies Quarterly52 (3): 489-53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
