Building on previous studies of the Long Confucian Peace, this article presents a novel dataset addressing questions about the long Confucian peace among China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam that existed from a newly defined period of 1598–1894. The dataset, referred to as the Long Confucian Peace Dataset (LCPD), fills gaps in the existing literature on this topic. It is described along with coding rules for the development of peace and conflict indexes. The dataset is used in an application that showcases various features of the peace, including the ebbs and flows of conflict and peace through four periods in the chronology. The analyses demonstrate how states with shared values navigated and managed relations across East Asia. These relations were often tenuous and grounded in shared interests rather than a spirit of communal cooperation. The article concludes with a discussion of a long-term research agenda, including analyses of similarities and differences between the LCPD and MIDs-based datasets on the democratic peace.
ChanR. K.2017. Korea-China Relations in History and Contemporary Implications. Springer.
2.
ClevelandW. S.DevlinS. J.. 1988. “Locally-weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Association83 (403): 596-610.
3.
Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field. 1864. International Humanitarian Law Database: International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gc-1864/state-parties. Accessed December 15, 2023.
4.
DiehlP. F.GoertzG.GallegosY.. 2021. “Peace Data: Concept, Measurement, Patterns, and Research Agenda.” Conflict Management and Peace Science38 (5): 605-624.
5.
DiehlP. F.DruckmanD.MullerG. B.. 2024. When Peacekeeping Missions Collide: Balancing Multiple Role in Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford University Press.
6.
DruckmanD.1980. “Social Psychological Factors in Regional Politics.” In Comparative Regional Systems, edited by FeldW. J.BoydG.. Pergamon Press.
7.
DruckmanD.2001. “Turning Points in International Negotiation: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (4): 519-544.
8.
DruckmanD.2005. Doing Research: Methods of Inquiry for Conflict Analysis. Sage.
9.
DruckmanD.WoodS.. 2023. “Scaling Up, Down, and Across: Pathways to a Theory of National Identity.” In Negotiation, Identity, and Justice: Pathways to Agreement, edited by DruckmanD.. Routledge.
10.
FryD. P.2006. The Human Potential for Peace. Oxford University Press.
11.
GaltungJ.1964. “An Editorial.” Journal of Peace Research1 (1): 1-4.
12.
GaltungJ.1969. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research6 (3): 167-191.
13.
GaltungJ.1996. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. PRIO.
14.
GardnerD. K.2007. The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian Tradition. Hackett Publishing Company.
15.
GiblerD. M.MillerS. M.LittleE. K.. 2016. “An Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Disputes Dataset, 1816-2001.” International Studies Quarterly60 (4): 719-730.
16.
HaboushJ. K.1991. “The Confucianization of Korean Society.” In The East Asian Region, edited by RozmanG., 84-110. Princeton University Press.
17.
HallJ. W.1991. The Cambridge History of Japan: Volume 4: Early Modern Japan. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HamashitaT.1997. “The Intra-Regional System in East Asia in Modern Times.” In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by KatzensteinP. J.TakashiS., 113-135. Cornell University Press.
19.
HarootunianH.2019. Uneven Moments: Reflections on Japan’s Modern History. Columbia University Press.
20.
HoffmanB.DiehlP. F.OwsiakA.GoertzG.GallegosY.. 2018. “What’s So Peaceful about Asian Peace?” Asian International Studies Review19 (1): 49-73.
21.
IkenberryG. J.2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press.
22.
Institute for Economics & Peace. 2024. Global Peace Index 2024: Measuring Peace in a Complex World.
23.
JansenMarius B.1989. The Cambridge History of Japan: Volume 5: The Nineteenth Century. Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press.
24.
KangD. C.2012. “Authority and Legitimacy in International Relations: Evidence from Korean and Japanese Relations in Pre-Modern East Asia.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics51 (1): 55–71.
25.
KangD. C.2020. “International Order in Historical East Asia: Tribute and Hierarchy Beyond Sinocentrism and Eurocentrism.” International Organization74 (1): 65-93.
26.
KangD. C.ShawM.FuR. T.-M.. 2016. “Measuring War in Early Modern East Asia, 1368–1841: Introducing Chinese and Korean Language Sources.” International Studies Quarterly60 (4): 766-777.
27.
KangD. C.NguyenD. X.FuR. T.-M.ShawM.. 2019. “War, Rebellion, and Intervention under Hierarchy: Vietnam–China Relations, 1365 to 1841.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (4): 896-922.
28.
KellyR. E.2012. “A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in Pre-Western East Asia?” European Journal of International Relations18 (3): 407-430.
29.
KiernanBen. 2019. Viet Nam: A History from Earliest Time to the Present. Oxford University Press.
30.
KimJ.2012. A History of Korea: From “Land of the Morning Calm” to States in Conflict. Indiana University Press.
31.
KyeS. B.2010. “Huddling Under the Imperial Umbrella: A Korean Approach to Ming China in the Early 1500s.” The Journal of Korean Studies15 (1): 41-66.
32.
LaiC.2018. “Historical and Cultural Features of Confucianism in East Asia.” In Confucianisms for a Changing World Cultural Order, edited by AmesR. T.HershockP. D., 102-111. University of Hawai’i Press.
33.
LeeK.-B.1984. A New History of Korea. Translated by Wagner E. W. with Shultz E. J. Harvard University Press.
34.
LeeJ.-Y.2017. China’s Hegemony: Four Hundred Years of East Asian Domination. Columbia University Press.
35.
MacKayJoseph. 2015. “Rethinking the IR Theory of Empire in Late Imperial China.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific15 (1): 53-79.
36.
MaozZ.JohnsonP. L.KaplanJ.OgunkoyaF.ShreveA. P.. 2019. “The Dyadic Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0: Logic, Characteristics, and Comparisons to Alternative Datasets.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (3): 811-835.
37.
MarcureK.1985. “The Danka System.” Monumenta Nipponica40 (1): 39-67.
38.
MatsuyamaM.2018. “Japan and the Western Powers.” In Culture, Power & Politics in Treaty Port Japan, 1854–1899: Key Papers, Press and Contemporary Writings, edited by HoareJ. E., 104-19. Amsterdam University Press.
39.
McNallyM. T.2016. Like No Other: Exceptionalism and Nativism in Early Modern Japan. University of Hawaii Press.
40.
NgW.-M.2019. Imagining China in Tokugawa Japan: Legends, Classics, and Historical Terms. SUNY Press.
41.
PaineS. C. M.2003. The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. Cambridge University Press.
42.
PalaisJ. B.1996. Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyongwon and the Late Choson Dynasty. University of Washington Press.
43.
ParamoreKiri. 2012. “The Nationalization of Confucianism: Academism, Examinations, and Bureaucratic Governance in the Late Tokugawa State.” The Journal of Japanese Studies38 (1): 25-53.
44.
PhillipsA.2018. “Contesting the Confucian Peace: Civilization, Barbarism and International Hierarchy in East Asia.” European Journal of International Relations24 (4): 740-764.
45.
PruittD. G.NowakA.. 2014. “Attractor Landscapes and Reaction Functions in Escalation and De-Escalation.” International Journal of Conflict Management25 (4): 387-406.
46.
ReimerL. E.SchmitzC. L.. 2021. “International Conflict Transformation: The Pursuit of Positive Peace.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace, edited by StandishK.DevereH.SuazoA.RaffertyR.. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0969-5_17.
47.
RichardsonL. F.1960. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels, (edited by WrightQLienanuCC). Boxwood Press.
48.
SakaiR. K.1964. “The Satsuma-Ryukyu Trade and the Tokugawa Seclusion Policy.” The Journal of Asian Studies233: 391–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/2050758
49.
SingerDJSmallM. 1972. The Wages of War, 1815-1965. John Wiley.
50.
SmallM.SingerD. J.. 1982. Resort to Arms: Civil and International War. Sage.
51.
TaylorR.ArbuckleG.. 1995. “Confucianism.” The Journal of Asian Studies54 (2): 347-354.
52.
TuW.-M.1996. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Cultures in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Harvard University Press.
53.
TurnbullS. R.2002. Samurai Invasion: Japan’s Korean War, 1592-98. Cassell and Company.
54.
WangY-K.2013. “Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia.” Journal of East Asian Studies132 (2): 207–32.
55.
WhitmoreJ. K.1984. “Social Organization and Confucian Thought in Vietnam.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies15 (2): 296-306.
56.
WhitmoreJ. K.2023. “Confucianism in Vietnam.” In The Oxford Handbook of Confucianism, edited by Oldstone-MooreJ.. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190906184.013.29.
57.
WomackBrantly. 2012. “Asymmetry and China’s Tributary System.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics5 (1): 37-54.
58.
ZhaoG.2013. The Qing Opening to the Ocean: Chinese Maritime Policies, 1684-1757. University of Hawaii Press.
59.
ZhouY.2009. “Confucianism.” In Children and Childhood in World Religions: Primary Sources and Texts, edited by BrowningD. S.BungeM. J., 337-392. Rutgers University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
