The “rally 'round the flag” effect—a short-term boost in a political leader’s popularity during an interstate political dispute—was first proposed by Mueller (1970) more than half a century ago. However, there is no scholarly consensus on its empirical validity and the circumstances under which the effect becomes most prominent. In this paper, based on a natural experimental design, we analyze large-scale worldwide surveys of 34,118 responses and causally identify the effects of 46 militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) on the approval ratings of political leaders in 27 countries. We find that MIDs, on average, decrease public support for national leaders. However, the public backlash could be attenuated depending on theoretically relevant contexts. Our finding implies that political leaders cannot rely on MIDs for public support increases, as they are generally penalized for such decisions.
BakerWilliam D.OnealJohn R.. 2001. “Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the ‘Rally 'Round the Flag’ Effect.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution45: 661-687.
2.
BrodyRichard A.1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford University Press.
3.
BurakovskyArik. 2022. “Putin’s Public Approval Is Soaring during the Russia-Ukraine Crisis, but It’s Unlikely to Last.” The Conversation, February 23. https://tinyurl.com/mux73k5t. (last accessed June 28, 2022).
4.
ChowanietzChristophe. 2011. “Rallying around the Flag or Railing against the Government? Political Parties’ Reactions to Terrorist Acts.” Party Politics17: 673-698.
5.
CottonTimothy Y.1986. “War and American Democracy: Electoral Costs of the Last Five Wars.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution30: 616-635.
6.
de la CuestaBrandonImaiKosuke. 2016. “Misunderstandings About the Regression Discontinuity Design in the Study of Close Elections.” Annual Review of Political Science19, 1: 375‐396.
7.
de MesquitaBruce BuenoSiversonRandolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review89: 841-855.
8.
de MesquitaBruce BuenoSiversonRandolph M.WollerGary. 1992. “War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review86: 638-646.
9.
EdwardsGeorge C.1990. Presidential Approval: A Sourcebook. Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Falcó-GimenoAlbertMuñozJordiPannicoRoberto. 2022. Double-Edged Bullets: The Conditional Effect of Terrorism on Vote for the Incumbent. forthcoming: British Journal of Political Science.
11.
FeinsteinYuval. 2022. Rally 'round the Flag: The Search for National Honor and Respect in Times of Crisis. Oxford University Press.
12.
FukumotoKentaroTabuchiTakahiro. 2022. “The Rally 'round the Flag Effect in a Third Party: The Japanese Reaction to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” Working paper.
13.
GiblerDouglas M.MillerSteven V.LittleErin K.. 2016. “An Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001.” International Studies Quarterly60 (4): 719-730.
14.
GodefroidtAmélie. 2022. How Terrorism Does (and Does Not) Affect Citizens’ Political Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis. forthcoming: American Journal of Political Science.
15.
GoldsmithBenjamin E.HoriuchiYusakuKellyMatush. 2021. “Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits.” American Political Science Review115 (4): 1342-1357.
16.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2022. “The Curious Case of Theresa May and the Public That Did Not Rally: Gendered Reactions to Terrorist Attacks Can Cause Slumps Not Bumps.” American Political Science Review116 (1): 249-264.
17.
HurwitzJonPeffleyMark. 1987. “The Means and Ends of Foreign Policy as Determinants of Presidential Support.” American Journal of Political Science31: 236-258.
18.
JamesPatrick. 1987. “Conflict and Cohesion: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.” Cooperation and Conflict22: 21-33.
19.
JamesPatrickHristoulasAthanasios. 1994. “Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy: Evaluating a Model of Crisis Activity for the United States.” The Journal of Politics56: 327-348.
20.
JamesPatrickRiouxJean Sébastien. 1998. “International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953-1994.” Political Research Quarterly51: 781-812.
21.
JentlesonBruce W.1992. “The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” International Studies Quarterly36: 49-73.
22.
JentlesonBruce W.BrittonRebecca L.. 1998. “Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution42: 395‐417.
KernellSamuel. 1978. “Explaining Presidential Popularity. How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One’s Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of Anomalies.” American Political Science Review72: 506-522.
25.
KuijpersDieuwertje. 2019. “Rally around All the Flags: The Effect of Military Casualties on Incumbent Popularity in Ten Countries 1990–2014.” Foreign Policy Analysis15 (3): 392-412.
26.
LeeJong R.1977. “Rallying around the Flag: Foreign Policy Events and Presidential Popularity.” Presidential Studies Quarterly7: 252-256.
27.
LevyJack S.1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” In Handbook of War Studies, edited by MidlarskyManus I., pp. 259-288. Boton, MA: Unwin Hyman.
28.
LianBradleyOnealJohn R.. 1993. “Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution37: 277-300.
29.
MacKuenMichael B.1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science27: 165-192.
30.
MarraRobin F.OstromCharles W.SimonDennis M.. 1990. “Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity: Creating Windows of Opportunity in the Perpetual Election.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution34: 588-623.
31.
McGeeLuke. 2022. “Analysis: Why Boris Johnson is probably happier in battle-ready Ukraine than London.” CNN, February 1, https://tinyurl.com/4ux4mj5t (last accessed: June 28, 2022).
32.
MorganT. CliftonBickersKenneth N.. 1992. “Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution36: 25-52.
33.
MostBenjamin A.StarrHarvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. University of South Carolina Press.
34.
MuellerJohn E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review64: 18-34.
35.
MuellerJohn E. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. Wiley.
36.
MuñozJordiFalcó-GimenoAlbertHernándezEnrique. 2020. “Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference.” Political Analysis28 (2): 186-206.
NeymanJ.ScottElizabeth L.. 1948. “Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations.” Econometrica16 (1): 1-32.
39.
NincicMiroslav. 1997. “Loss Aversion and the Domestic Context of Military Intervention.” Political Research Quarterly50: 97-120.
40.
OnealJohn R.BryanAnna Lillian. 1995. “The Rally 'Round the Flag Effect in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises, 1950–1985.” Political Behavior17: 379-401.
41.
OstromCharles W.JobBrian L.. 1986. “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review80: 541-566.
42.
OstromCharles W.SimonDennis M.. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review79: 334-358.
43.
PalmerGlennD’OrazioVitoKenwickMichael RMcManusRoseanne W. 2020. “Updating the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data: A Response to Gibler, Miller, and Little.” International Studies Quarterly64 (2): 469-475.
44.
RussettBruce M. 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Harvard University Press.
45.
SigelmanLeeConoverPamela Johnston. 1981. “The Dynamics of Presidential Support during International Conflict Situations: The Iranian Hostage Crisis.” Political Behavior3: 303-318.
46.
TurkogluOguzhanChadefauxThomas. 2022. The Effect of Terrorist Attacks on Attitudes and Its Duration. forthcoming: Political Science Research and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
