What are the domestic consequences of symbolic conflict resolution? We isolate the effect of symbolic conflict by looking into a dispute with no material stakes (for one side), but high symbolic ones: the Prespa Agreement, which ended the dispute on the name of FYROM, thenceforth named North Macedonia. Greeks opposed this name because the ancient Macedonian heritage is central to their national identity. Based on social identity theory, we expect this threat to the group’s distinctiveness to increase nationalist sentiment. Using an original dataset of flags displayed in the façade of buildings in Athens and Thessaloniki, which we compare to Lisbon, we find an increase in national flags in the Greek cities after the Agreement. The effect is stronger in Thessaloniki, Greek Macedonia’s capital, where the identity threat was more pronounced. We also find that the treaty shifted voters to the right, especially those residing in the region of Macedonia.
AckermannAlice. 1996. “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: A Relatively Successful Case of Conflict Prevention in Europe.” Security Dialogue27 (4): 409-424.
2.
ArmstrongJohn A. 1982. Nations Before Nationalism. United States of America: University of Chapel Hill Press Books.
3.
ArthurCatherine. 2018. “From Fretilin to Freedom: The Evolution of the Symbolism of Timor-Leste’s National Flag.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies49 (2): 227-249.
4.
AtranScottAxelrodRobertDavisRichard. 2007. “Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution.” Science317: 1039-1040.
5.
AutesserreSéverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BakerWilliam D.OnealJohn R.. 2001. “Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the “Rally’round the Flag” Effect.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (5): 661-687.
7.
BercovitchJacobLamareJames W.. 1993. “The Process of International Mediation: An Analysis of the Determinants of Successful and Unsuccessful Outcomes.” Australian Journal of Political Science28 (2): 290-305.
8.
BercovitchJacobDerouenKarl. 2004. “Mediation in Internationalized Ethnic Conflicts: Assessing the Determinants of a Successful Process.” Armed Forces & Society30 (2): 147-170.
9.
BerinskyAdam J. 2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” The Journal of Politics69 (4): 975-997.
BoscoAnnaMorlinoLeonardo. 2006. “What Changes in South European Parties? A Comparative Introduction.” South European Society and Politics11 (3-4): 331-358.
12.
BouchardThomas JJr. 1976. “Unobtrusive Measures: An Inventory of Uses.” Sociological Methods & Research4 (3): 267-300.
13.
BrewerMarilynn B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues55 (3): 429-444.
14.
BrownRupert J. 1984. “The Role of Similarity in Intergroup Relations.” In The Social Dimension, edited by TajfelHenri, 603-623. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BursztynL.GonzálezA. L.Yanagizawa-DrottD., 2020. Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. American economic review110 (10): 2997-3029.
16.
BursztynL.EgorovG.FiorinS.. 2020. From extreme to mainstream: The erosion of social norms. American economic review110 (11): 3522–3548.
17.
ButzDavid A.PlantE. AshbyDoerrCeleste E.. 2007. “Liberty and Justice for All? Implications of Exposure to the U.S. Flag for Intergroup Relations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33 (3): 396-408. doi:10.1177/0146167206296299
18.
CarterTravis J.FergusonMelissa J.HassinRan R.. 2011. “A Single Exposure to the American Flag Shifts Support Toward Republicanism up to 8 Months Later.” Psychological Science22: 1011-1018. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414726
19.
ClaassenChristopher. 2020. “In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion.” American Political Science Review114 (1): 36-53.
20.
DeZaliaRebekah A PhillipsMoeschbergerScott L. 2014. “The Function of Symbols That Bind and Divide.” In Symbols That Bind, Symbols That Divide, 1-12. Switzerland: Springer.
21.
DinasEliasSergiMartínezVicenteValentim. 2020. Social Norm Change, Political Symbols, and Expression of Stigmatized Preferences. Forthcoming at the Journal of Politics. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3516831
22.
EhrlingerJoycePlantE. AshbyEibachRichard P.ColumbCorey J.GoplenJoanna L.KunstmanJonathan W.ButzDavid A.. 2011. “How Exposure to the Confederate Flag Affects Willingness to Vote for Barack Obama.” Political Psychology32 (1): 131-146. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00797.x
23.
EngelenBart. 2006. “Solving the Paradox: The Expressive Rationality of the Decision to Vote.” Rationality and Society18(4):419-441.
24.
EnosRyan D. 2016. “What the Demolition of Public Housing Teaches us About the Impact of Racial Threat on Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 123-142.
25.
FishmanRobert M. 1990. “Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy.” World Politics42 (3): 422-440.
26.
GaertnerSamuel L.DovidioJohn F.SamuelGaertner. 2000. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. New York and London: Psychology Press.
27.
GingesJeremyAtranScottMedinDouglasShikakiKhalil. 2007. “Sacred Bounds on Rational Resolution of Violent Political Conflict.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104 (18): 7357-7360.
28.
GrayJulia. 2013. The Company States Keep: International Economic Organizations and Investor Perceptions. USA: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GrayJuliaHicksRaymond P.. 2014. “Reputations, Perceptions, and International Economic Agreements.” International Interactions40 (3): 325-349.
30.
GuisingerAlexandraSaundersElizabeth N.. 2017. “Mapping the Boundaries of Elite Cues: How Elites Shape Mass Opinion across International Issues.” International Studies Quarterly61 (2): 425-441. URL:https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/61/2/425/4065443
31.
GuéguenNicolasMartinAngéliqueStefanJordy. 2017. “Holding Your Flag: The Effects of Exposure to a Regional Symbol on People’s Behavior.” European Journal of Social Psychology47 (5): 539-552. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejsp.2239
32.
HarinckFiekeDruckmanDaniel. 2017. “Do Negotiation Interventions Matter? Resolving Conflicting Interests and Values.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (1): 29-55.
33.
HarrisonSimon. 1995. “Four Types of Symbolic Conflict.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute1 (2): 255-272.
34.
HaslamS. Alexander. 2004. Psychology in Organizations. London, California, New Delhi: Sage.
35.
HoggMichael AAbramsDominicBrewerMarilynn B. 2017. “Social Identity: The Role of Self in Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations20 (5): 570-581.
36.
HornseyMatthew JHoggMichael A. 2000b. “Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26 (2): 242-256.
37.
HuddyLeonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology22 (1): 127-156.
38.
IacovielloVincenzoValsecchiGiuliaBerentJacquesAndersonJoelFalomir-PichastorJuan M.. 2020. “Heterosexual Men’s Attitudes Towards Homosexuality and Ingroup Distinctiveness: The Role of Perceived Men’s Feminisation.” Psychology & Sexuality11 (1-2): 45-61. doi:10.1080/19419899.2019.1675749
39.
InskoChester AHoyleRick HPinkleyRobin LHongGui-YoungSlimRanda MDaltonBretLinYuan-Huei WRuffinPaulette PDardisGregory JBernthalPaul RSchoplerJohn. 1988. “Individual-Group Discontinuity: The Role of a Consensus Rule.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology24 (6): 505-519. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022103188900492
40.
KatrougalosGeorge S. 1996. “The South European Welfare Model: The Greek Welfare State, in Search of an Identity.” Journal of European Social Policy6 (1): 39-60.
41.
KaufmanStuart J. 2006. “Escaping the Symbolic Politics Trap: Reconciliation Initiatives and Conflict Resolution in Ethnic Wars.” Journal of Peace Research43 (2): 201-218.
42.
KedarOrit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancingin Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review99 (2): 185-199.
KuranTimur. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Mac GintyRoger. 2001. “The Political Use of Symbols of Accord and Discord: Northern Ireland and South Africa.” Civil Wars4 (1): 1-21.
46.
MaozZeev. 1984. “Peace by Empire? Conflict Outcomes and International Stability, 1816-1976.” Journal of Peace Research21 (3): 227-241.
47.
McLeanIainMcMillanAlistair. 2009. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford.
48.
MeulemanRozaLubbersMarcel. 2013. “Manifestations of Nationalist Attitudes: Domestic Music Listening, Participation in National Celebrations, and Far Right Voting.” European Sociological Review29 (6): 1214-1225.
49.
MikulaschekChristoph. 2018. “Cueing Foreign Elite Consensus or Divisions: The Effect of Unanimity in International Organizations on Public Opinion. In Political Economy of International Organization Conference.
50.
MooreGavinLoizidesNeophytosSandalNukhet ALordosAlexandros. 2014. “Winning Peace Frames: Intra-Ethnic Outbidding in Northern Ireland and Cyprus.” West European Politics37 (1): 159-181.
51.
NechevZoranCerimagićAdnan. 2019. “Why the Compromise Over North Macedonia Should Offer a Lesson for the Rest of Europe”.
52.
ObućinaVedran. 2015. “Symbolic Name Strategies: Iran and the Persian Gulf”.
53.
O’NeillBarry. 2001. Honor, Symbols, and War. University of Michigan Press. Google-Books-ID: ALddLI2y0xAC.
54.
PolkJonathanRovnyJanBakkerRyanEdwardsEricaHoogheLiesbetJollySethKoedamJelleKostelkaFilipMarksGarySchumacherGijsSteenbergenMarcoVachudovaMiladaZilovicMarko. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe With the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data.” Research & Politics4 (1): 2053168016686915.
55.
RabinowitzGeorgeMacdonaldStuart Elaine. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review83 (1): 93-121.
56.
RozenasArturasVlasenkoAnastasiia. 2022. “The Real Consequences of Symbolic Politics: Breaking the Soviet Past in Ukraine.” The Journal of Politics84 (3).
57.
SandersDavidTokaGabor. 2013. “Is Anyone Listening? Mass and Elite Opinion Cueing in the EU.” Electoral Studies32 (1): 13-25.
58.
SandsMelissa L. 2017. “Exposure to Inequality Affects Support for Redistribution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114 (4): 663-668.
59.
SandsMelissa L.de KadtDaniel. 2019. Local Exposure to Inequality Among the Poor Increases Support for Taxing the Rich. Publisher: SocArXiv.
60.
SchatzRobert TLavineHoward. 2007. “Waving the Flag: National Symbolism, Social Identity, and Political Engagement.” Political Psychology28 (3): 329-355.
61.
SchmitterPhilippe C. 1986. An Introduction to Southern European Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey. na.
62.
SenguptaAnita. 2017. “Conclusions: The Politics of Symbolism.” In Symbols and the Image of the State in Eurasia, edited by SenguptaAnita, 111-125: Springer Singapore: SpringerBriefs in Political Science Singapore.
63.
ShortJohn RennieDubotsLeah. 2020. “Contesting Place Names: The East Sea/Sea of Japan naming issue.” Geographical Review.
64.
SigelmanLee. 1990. “Disarming the Opposition: The President, the Public, and the INF Treaty.” Public Opinion Quarterly54 (1): 37-47.
SteenbergenMarco R.EdwardsErica E.De VriesCatherine E.. 2007. “Who’s Cueing Whom? Mass-Elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration.” European Union Politics8 (1): 13-35.
67.
SternPaul C. 1995. “Why do People Sacrifice for Their Nations?” Political Psychology16 (2): 217-235.
68.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn CAustinWilliam GWorchelStephen. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Organizational Identity: A Reader56: 65.
69.
ThakurRamesh. 2019. International Conflict Resolution. New York, USA: Routledge.
70.
TurnerBarry A. 2014. Organizational Symbolism. Berlin, Germany; New York, USA: Vol. 19 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
71.
ValentimVicente. 2021. “Parliamentary Representation and the Normalization of Radical Right Support.” Comparative Political Studies Forthcoming. URL:https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3289275
72.
VangeliAnastas. 2011. “Nation-Building Ancient Macedonian Style: the Origins and the Effects of the So-Called Antiquization in Macedonia.” Nationalities Papers39 (1): 13-32.
73.
VillamilFranciscoBalcellsLaia. 2021. “Do TJ Policies Cause Backlash? Evidence From Street Name Changes in Spain.” Research & Politics8 (4): 20531680211058550.
WrightsmanLawrence S. 1969. “Wallace Supporters and Adherence to” Law and Order”.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology13 (1): 17.
76.
YaffeNechumi MalovickiSolakNevinHalperinEranSaguyTamar. 2018. ““Poor is Pious”: Distinctiveness Threat Increases Glorification of Poverty Among the Poor.” European Journal of Social Psychology48 (4): 460-471.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
