The comparative study of atrocities and atrocity prevention faces several obstacles including a lack of consensus on the universe of cases and too few cases to statistically test alternative theories. The brutality-based (BB) conception is based on the idea that widespread, state-led violations of physical integrity rights constitute an assault on the personhood and human dignity of the members of society— a mass atrocity. Applying this idea to all countries annually systematically identifies a larger number of atrocities and facilitates categorization into three levels of intensity. The BB methodology for generating annual atrocity lists is replicable and transparent. The findings show that, between 1981 and 2019, the frequency of atrocities as defined and identified by other projects has been decreasing, but BB atrocities have been increasing. The sequence of different types of widespread physical integrity violations suggests new avenues for research on atrocity occurrence, escalation, de-escalation, and cessation.
BarryC. M.ClayK. C.FlynnM. E.. 2013. “Avoiding the Spotlight: Human Rights Shaming and Foreign Direct Investment1.” International Studies Quarterly57 (3): 532‐544.
5.
BellS. R.CingranelliD.MurdieA.CaglayanA.. 2013. “Coercion, capacity, and coordination: Predictors of political violence.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (3): 240‐262.
ButcherCGoldsmithB. E.NanlohyS.SowmyaA.MuchlinskiD.. 2020. “Introducing the Targeted Mass Killing Data Set for the Study and Forecasting of Mass Atrocities.” Journal of Conflict Resolution64 (7-8): 1524‐1547.
8.
CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L.. 1999. “Measuring the Level, Pattern, and Sequence of Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights.” International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 407‐417.
9.
CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L.. 2010. “The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) human rights data project.” Human Rights Quarterly32 (2): 401‐424.
10.
CingranelliD.FilippovMikhail.MarkBrendan. Skip.. 2021. The CIRIGHTS Dataset. Version 2021.01.21. The Binghamton University Human Right Institute. www.binghamton.edu/institutes/hri/.
11.
CingranelliD.FilippovM.. 2018. “Are Human Rights Practices Improving?.” American Political Science Review112 (4): 1083‐1089.
12.
ClarkA. M.SikkinkK.. 2013. “Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures?.” Human Rights Quarterly35 (3): 539‐568.
13.
Contemporary Genocides. 1996. Causes, Cases, Consequences, edited by, JongmanAlbert J, 33‐58. Leiden: University of Leiden: PIOOM.
14.
CordellR.ClayK. C.FarissC. J.WoodR. M.WrightT. M.. 2020. “Changing standards or political whim? Evaluating changes in the content of US State Department Human Rights Reports following presidential transitions.” Journal of Human Rights19 (1): 3‐18.
DawkinsS.2020. “The problem of the missing dead.” Journal of Peace Research58 (5): 1‐19.
17.
DeMerittJ. H. R.ConradC. R.. 2019. “Repression Substitution: Shifting Human Rights Violations in Response to UN Naming and Shaming.” Civil Wars21 (1): 128‐152.
EckK.HultmanL.. 2007. “One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War.” Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 233‐246.
20.
FarissC. J.2014. “Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability.” American Political Science Review108 (2): 297‐318.
21.
FinkelE.StrausS.. 2012. “Macro, Meso, and Micro Research on Genocide: Gains, Shortcomings, and Future Areas of Inquiry.” Genocide Studies and Prevention7 (1): 56‐67.
22.
GagnonV. P.2004. The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
23.
GoldhagenD. J.1996. Hitler’s Willing Executioner: Ordinary Germans in the Holocaust. New York, NY: Knopf.
24.
GoldhagenD. J.2009. Worse than War: Genocide, Eliminationism, and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
25.
Gutiérrez-SanínFranciscoWoodElisabeth Jean. 2017. “What should we mean by “pattern of political violence”? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique.” Perspectives on Politics15(1): 20-41.
26.
HaganJRymond-RichmondW.. 2008. Darfur and the Crime of Genocide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HanEnzePaikChristopher. 2014. “Dynamics of political resistance in Tibet: religious repression and controversies of demographic change.” The China Quarterly, 217, 69‐98.
28.
HarffBarbara.GurrT.R.. 1996. “Victims of the State: Genocides, Politicides, and Group Repression from 1945 to 1995.” In the Contemporary Genocides: Causes, Cases, Consequences edited by Albert J. Jongman, 33-58. Leiden, University of Leiden: PIOOM.
29.
HarffB.2003. “No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955.” American Political ScienceReview97 (1): 57‐73.
30.
HaschkeP.GibneyM.. 2017. “Are global human rights conditions static or improving?.” In Peace and Conflict, edited by BackerDavidBhavnaniRavinderHuthPaul, 88‐100. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
HaschkePeterArnonDaniel. 2020. “What bias? Changing standards, information effects, and human rights measurement.” Journal of Human Rights19(1): 33-45.
32.
HillW. D.2016. “Democracy and the concept of personal integrity rights.” The Journal of Politics78 (3): 822‐835.
33.
HillW. D.MooreW. H.MukherjeeB.. 2013. “Information Politics Versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International's ''Naming and Shaming'' Reports Biased?1.” International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 219‐232.
34.
JoynerC. C2007. “The Responsibility to Protect: Humanitarian Concern and the Lawfulness of Armed Intervention.” Virginia Journal of International Law47 (3): 693‐724.
35.
KarrethJ.SullivanP. L.DezfuliG.. 2020. “Explaining How Human Rights Protections Change After Internal Armed Conflicts.” Journal of Global Security Studies5 (2): 248‐264.
36.
KiernanBen.2007. Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney. Designing social inquiry. Princeton university press, 1994.
38.
KrainM.1997. “State-Sponsored Mass Murder.” Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (3): 331‐360.
MannMichael.2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MarshallM. G.GurrT. R.HarffB.. 2019. PITF - State Failure Problem Set: Internal Wars and Failures of Governance , 1955-2018. Distributed by Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research (INSCR)http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.
42.
MeierhenrichJ.2020. “How Many Victims Were There in the Rwandan Genocide? A Statistical Debate.” Journal of Genocide Research22 (1): 72‐82.
43.
MidlarskyManusM. I.2005. The Killing Trap: Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
O’BrienS. P.2010. “Crisis Early Warning and Decision Support: Contemporary Approaches and Thoughts on Future Research.” International Studies Review12 (1): 87‐104.
45.
OswaldMargit. E.GrosjeanStefan.. 2004. “Confirmation Bias.” In Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, edited by PohlRüdiger F., ed, 79‐96. United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
PattersonWilliam Lorenzo.1951. We Charge Genocide, The Historic Petition to the United Nations for Relief from a Crime of the United States Government Against the Negro People. NY: Civil Rights Congress.
48.
PayneC. L.AbouharbM. R.. 2016. “The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the strategic shift to forced disappearance.” Journal of Human Rights15 (2): 163‐188.
49.
PoeS. C.CareyS. C.VazquezT. C.. 2001. “How Are These Pictures Different? A Quantitative Comparison of the Us State Department and Amnesty International Human Rights Reports, 1976-1995.” Human Rights Quarterly23 (3): 650‐677.
50.
RichardsD. L.2016. “The myth of information effects in human rights data: Response to Ann Marie Clark and Kathryn Sikkink.” Human Rights Quarterly38 (2): 477‐492.
51.
RodwanAbouharb. M.2019. Evading Accountability: The case of the Second Chechen War. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Meeting. August 29-September 1. Washington DC.
52.
SatterthwaiteM. L.2016. “Coding Personal Integrity Rights: Assessing Standards-Based Measures against Human Rights Law and Practice.” N.Y.U. Journal of International Law and Politics48 (2): 513‐580.
53.
ScovazziTullio.CitroniGabriella.. 2007. The Struggle Against Enforced Disappearance and the 2007 United Nations Convention. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
54.
SemelinJacques.2007. Purify and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
55.
SikkinkKathryn.2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
StrausS.2012. “Retreating from the Brink: Theorizing Mass Violence and the Dynamics of Restraint.” Perspectives on Politics10 (2): 343‐362.
58.
StrausScott.2016. Fundamentals of Genocide and Mass Atrocity. Washington, DC: United States Holocatust Memorial Museum.
59.
SwaineA.2015. “Beyond Strategic Rape and Between the Public and Private: Violence Against Women in Armed Conflict.” Human Rights Quarterly37 (3): 755‐786.
60.
UlfelderJay.ValentinoBenjamin.. 2008. “Assessing Risks of State-Sponsored Mass Killing.” Political Instability Task Force, 1‐47.
ValentinoBenjamin.2004. Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
68.
VerdejaE.2012. “The Political Science of Genocide: Outlines of an Emerging Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics10 (2): 307‐321.
69.
WeitzEric2003. A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
WoodR. M.GibneyM.. 2010. “The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A Re-introduction and a Comparison to CIRI.” Human Rights Quarterly32 (2): 367‐400.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
