When do indigenous and other negatively affected populations mobilize against fossil fuel companies? We revisit social movement theory and environmental literature to identify three factors that may plausibly shape mobilization decisions of negatively affected populations—democratic institutions, community perceptions of government shaped by land tenure security, and firm attributes. Democratic institutions afford more opportunities for affected populations to air their grievances through protests than non-democratic ones. Land tenure security guaranteed by government contributes to the perception among affected populations that their objectives are better achieved through government mediation than protests. Characteristics of fossil fuel firms, such as state ownership, also shape activist perceptions of government credibility as a mediator. By analyzing fifty-seven countries over the period 1990 to 2013, we find that democracy and state ownership of fossil fuel firms are positively associated with protests, whereas land tenure security is negatively associated.
AndersonTerry L.McChesneyFred S.. 1994. “Raid or Trade? An Economic Model of Indian-white Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics37:39–74.
3.
BartelRobynGrahamNicole. 2016. “Property and Place Attachment: A Legal Geographical Analysis of Biodiversity Law Reform in New South Wales.” Geographical Research54 (3): 267–84.
4.
BellCurtisWolfordScott. 2015. “Oil Discoveries, Shifting Power, and Civil Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly59 (3): 517–30.
5.
BermanNicolasCouttenierMathieuRohnerDominicThoenigMathias. 2017. “This Mine is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa.” American Economic Review107 (6): 1564–610.
6.
BlairGraeme. 2016. “Crude Interruption: How the Proximity of Assets and People Shapes Political Conflict.” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
7.
Buenode MesquitaSmithBruce, AlastairSiversonRandolph M.MorrowJames D.. 2005. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BullardRobert D.1994. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9.
BullardRobert D.JohnsonGlenn S.. 2000. “Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activism and Its Impact on Public Policy Decision Making.” Journal of Social Issues56 (3): 555–78.
10.
CameronColin A.TrivediPravin K.. 2013. “Count Panel Data.” In Oxford Handbook of Panel Data Econometrics, edited by Badi H. Baltagi. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
CheonAndrewUrpelainenJohannes. 2018. Activism and the Fossil Fuel Industry. New York: Routledge.
12.
ChristensenDarin. 2018. “The Geography of Repression in Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (7): 1517–43.
13.
ChristensenDarin. 2019. “Concession Stands: How Mining Investments Incite Protest in Africa.” International Organization73 (1): 65–101.
14.
CichockaAleksandraGórskaPaulinaJostJohn T.SuttonRobbie M.BilewiczMichał. 2018. “What Inverted U Can Do for Your Country: A Curvilinear Relationship between Confidence in the Social System and Political Engagement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology115 (5): 883–902.
15.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.Chad ClayK.. 2014. “The CIRI Human Rights Dataset.” Version 2014.04.14. Accessed July 12, 2019. http://www.humanrightsdata.com.
16.
ColganJeff. 2014. “Oil, Domestic Conflict, and Opportunities for Democratization.” Journal of Peace Research52 (1): 3–16.
17.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2005. “Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (4): 625–33.
18.
CondeMarta. 2017. “Resistance to Mining: A Review.” Ecological Economics132:80–90.
19.
CondeMartaBillonPhilippe Le. 2017. “Why Do Some Communities Resist Mining Projects While Others Do Not?” The Extractive Industries and Society4 (3): 681–97.
20.
CoxeStefanyWestStephen G.AikenLeona S.. 2009. “The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Personality Assessment91 (2): 121–36.
21.
DubeOeindrilaVargasJuan F.. 2013. “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.” Review of Economic Studies80 (4): 1384–421.
22.
FriedenJeffry. 1994. “International Investment and Colonial Control: A New Interpretation.” International Organization48 (4): 559–93.
23.
GallopMaxWeschleSimon. 2019. “Assessing the Impact of Non-random Measurement Error on Inference: A Sensitivity Analysis Approach.” Political Science Research and Methods7 (2): 367–84.
24.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
25.
GreeneWilliam H. 2007. “Fixed and Random Effects Models for Count Data.” Leonard N. Stern School of Business Paper No. ISSN 1547-3651. NY, USA: New York University.
26.
GrovesChristopher. 2015. “The Bomb in My Backyard, the Serpent in My House: Environmental Justice, Risk, and the Colonisation of Attachment.” Environmental Politics24 (6): 853–73.
27.
HancockKathleen J.VivodaVlado. 2014. “International Political Economy: A Field Born of the OPEC Crisis Returns to its Energy Roots.” Energy Research & Social Science1:206–16.
28.
HarstadBårdMideksaTorben K.. 2017. “Conservation Contracts and Political Regimes.” Review of Economic Studies84:1708–34.
29.
HaslamPaul AlexanderTanimouneNasser Ary. 2016. “The Determinants of Social Conflict in Latin American Mining Sector: New Evidence with Quantitative Data.” World Development78:401–19.
30.
HillDaniel W.MooreWill H.MukherjeeBumba. 2013. “Information Politics Versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International’s “Naming and Shaming” Reports Biased?” International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 219–32.
31.
HumphreysMacartanSachsJeffrey D.StiglitzJoseph E.. 2007. Escaping the Resource Curse. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
KarlTerry Lynn. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-states. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33.
KellyAllisonMasudaYuta J.HollandMargaretRobinsonBrian E.BarthelKevinBedfordCharlesChildressMalcolmGameEdward T.GinsburgChloeHillhorstTheaLawryStevenMusengeziJessicaNaughton-TrevesLisaSunderlinWilliamVeitPeter. 2017. “Mapping the Global Governance Context for Land Tenure Security.” Paper prepared for 2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Security.
34.
KennedyAmanda. 2017. Environmental Justice and Land Use Conflict: The Governance of Mineral and Gas Resource Development. London, UK: Routledge.
35.
KennedyAmandaSchafftKai A.HowardTanya M.. 2017. “Taking Away David’s Sling: Environmental Justice and Land-use Conflict in Extractive Resource Development.” Local Environment22 (8): 952–68.
36.
Le BillonPhilippe. 2001. “The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts.” Political Geography20 (5): 561–84.
37.
Le BillonPhilippe. 2005. Fuelling War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflict. New York: Routledge.
38.
LeiYu-HsiangMichaelsGuy. 2014. “Do Giant Oilfield Discoveries Fuel Internal Armed Conflicts?” Journal of Development Economics110:139–57.
39.
MahdaviPaasha. 2014. “Why Do Leaders Nationalize the Oil Industry? The Politics of Resource Expropriation.” Energy Policy75:228–43.
40.
Martinez-AlierJoan. 2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
41.
Martinez-AlierJoanTemperLeahBeneDaniela DelScheidelArnim. 2016. “Is There a Global Environmental Justice Movement?” Journal of Peasant Studies43 (3): 731–55.
42.
McAdamDouglas. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
McAdamDouglas. 2017. “Social Movement Theory and the Prospects for Climate Change Activism in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science20:189–208.
44.
McKibbenBill. 2013. Oil and Honey: The Education of an Unlikely Activist. New York: Times Books.
45.
MiddeldorpNickBillonPhilippe Le. 2019. “Deadly Environmental Governance: Authoritarianism, Eco-populism, and the Repression of Environmental and Land Defenders.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers109 (2): 324–37.
46.
MotavalliJim. 1998. “Toxic Targets: Polluters that Dump on Communities of Color are Finally Being Brought to Justice.” E-Magazine, pp. 29–41. Accessed July 24, 2020. http://www.ejnet.org/ej/Estory.html.
47.
NavasGrettelMingorriaSaraAguilar-GonzálezBernardo. 2018. “Violence in Environmental Conflicts: The Need for a Multidimensional Approach.” Sustainability Science13 (3): 649–60.
48.
NaceTed. 2009. Climate Hope: On the Front Lines of the Fight against Coal. San Francisco, CA: Coal Swarm.
49.
NewellPeter. 2008. “Civil Society, Corporate Accountability and the Politics of Climate Change.” Global Environmental Politics8 (3): 122–53.
50.
PellowDavid N.2001. “Environmental Justice and the Political Process: Movements, Corporations, and the State.” Sociological Quarterly42 (1): 47–67.
PiggotGeorgia. 2018. “The Influence of Social Movements on Policies that Constrain Fossil Fuel Supply.” Climate Policy18 (7): 942–54.
53.
RobinsonBrian E.HollandMargaret B.Naughton-TrevesLisa. 2014. “Does Secure Land Tenure Save Forests? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Land Tenure and Tropical Deforestation.” Global Environmental Change29:281–93.
54.
RobinsonBrian E.MasudaYuta J.KellyAllisonHollandMargaret B.BedfordCharlesChildressMalcolmFletschnerDianaGameEdward T.GinsburgChloeHilhorstTheaLawryStevenMitevaDaniela A.MusengeziJessicaNaughton-TrevesLisaNolteChristophSunderlinWilliam D.VeitPeter. 2018. “Incorporating Land Tenure Security Into Conservation.” Conservation Letters11 (2): 1–12.
55.
RossMichael L.2013. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
SchlosbergDavid. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchlosbergDavid. 2012. “Climate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy.” Ethics and International Affairs26 (4): 445–61.
58.
SchunckReinhard. 2013. “Within and Between Estimates in Random-effects Models: Advantages and Drawbacks of Correlated Random Effects and Hybrid Models.” Stata Journal13 (1): 65–76.
59.
SextonRenard. 2020. “Unpacking the Local Resource Curse: How Externalities and Governance Shape Social Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution64 (4): 640–73.
60.
TarrowSidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TaylorDorceta E.2011. “Introduction: The Evolution of Environmental Justice Activism, Research, and Scholarship.” Environmental Practice13 (4): 280–301.
62.
TemperLeahBeneDaniela delMartinez-AlierJoan. 2015. “Mapping the Frontiers and Front Lines of Global Environmental Justice: The EJAtlas.” Journal of Political Ecology22:255–58.
63.
TienhaaraKyla. 2011. “Foreign Investment Contracts in the Oil & Gas Sector: A Survey of Environmentally Relevant Clauses.” Sustainable Development Law & Policy11 (3): 15–20, 39–40.
64.
TillyCharles. 2006. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
TillyCharlesTarrowSidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
WattsMichael. 2009. “The Rule of Oil: Petro-politics and The Anatomy of an Insurgency.” Journal of African Development11 (2): 27–56.
67.
WillowAnna J.ZakRebeccaVilaplanaDanielleSheeleyDavid. 2014. “The Contested Landscape of Unconventional Energy Development: A Report from Ohio’s Shale Gas Country.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences4 (1): 56–64.
68.
WylieSara. 2018. Fractivism: Corporate Bodies and Chemical Bonds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
69.
XieLeiVan Der HeijdenHein-Anton. 2010. “Environmental Movements and Political Opportunities: The Case of China.” Social Movement Studies9 (1): 51–68.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
