Television is an overlooked tool of state building. We estimate the impact of televising criminal proceedings on public use of government courts to resolve disputes. We draw on survey data from Afghanistan, where the government used television as a mechanism for enhancing the legitimacy of formal legal institutions during an ongoing conflict. We find consistent evidence of enhanced support for government courts among survey respondents who trust television following the nation’s first televised criminal trial. We find no evidence that public confidence in other government functions (e.g. economy, development, corruption) improved during this period. Our findings suggest that television may provide a means of building state legitimacy during war and other contexts of competition between political authorities.
AriasEnrique Desmond. 2006. “The Dynamics of Criminal Governance: Networks and Social Order in Rio de Janeiro.” Journal of Latin American Studies38 (02): 293.
4.
ArjonaAna. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AziziAbdul Maqsud. 2012. “Taleban Justice Dominant in Logar Province.” Technical Report. London, UK: Institute for War & Peace Reporting.
6.
BaczkoAdam. 2013. “Judging in a Context of Civil War: The Taliban Courts in Afghanistan (2001-2013).” Politix26 (104): 25–46.
7.
BalcellsLaiaTorrats-EspinosaGerard. 2018. “The Electoral Consequences of Terrorism: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115 (42): 10624–29.
8.
BaldwinKateHolzingerKatharina. 2019. “Traditional Political Institutions and Democracy: Reassessing Their Compatibility and Accountability.” Comparative Political Studies52 (12): 1747–74.
9.
BatesRobert H.2010. Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
10.
BBC. 2014. “Afghan Executions: Five Hanged for Paghman Gang-rape.” British Broadcasting Corporation, October. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-29537738.
11.
BermanEliMatanockAila M.. 2015. “The Empiricists’ Insurgency.” Annual Review of Political Science18 (1): 443–64.
12.
BlattmanChristopherHartmanAlexandra C.BlairRobert A.. 2014. “How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education.” American Political Science Review108 (01): 100–20.
13.
BowdRichard. 2009. Access to Justice in Africa: Comparisons between Sierra Leone. China: Tanzania and Zambia.
14.
CaseyKatherineGlennersterRachelMiguelEdwardVoorsMaarten. 2018. “Skill versus Voice in Local Development.” Working Paper 25022, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
ChirayathLeilaSageCarolineWoolcockMichael. 2005. Customary Law and Policy Reform: Engaging with the Plurality of Justice Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank.
CondraLuke N.WrightAustin L.. 2019. “Civilians, Control, and Collaboration during Civil Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly630(4): 897–907.
19.
Diaz-CayerosAlbertoMagaloniBeatrizRuiz-EulerAlexander. 2014. “Traditional Governance, Citizen Engagement, and Local Public Goods: Evidence from Mexico.” World Development53:80–93.
20.
FaqirKhanAttaMalik AmerIslamFakhrul. 2013. “Jirga: A Conflict Resolution Institution in Pukhtoon Society.” Gomal University Journal of Research29 (1): 87–95.
FarrellTheoGiustozziAntonio. 2013. “The Taliban at War: Inside the Helmand Insurgency, 2004–2012.” International Affairs89 (4): 845–71.
23.
FlomokuPeweeReevesLemuel. 2012. “Formal and Informal Justice in Liberia.” Accord, Conciliation Resources23: 44–47.
24.
GagliarducciStefanoOnoratoMassimiliano GaetanoSobbrioFrancescoTabelliniGuido. 2017. “War of the Waves: Radio and Resistance during World War II.” UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Papers.
25.
GambettaDiego. 1993. The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
26.
Garcia-ArenasJ.2016. “The Impact of Free Media on Regime Change: Evidence from Russia.” France, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, Working Paper.
27.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.SinkinsonMichael. 2011. “The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics.” American Economic Review101 (7): 2980–3018.
28.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.BairdVanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review92 (2): 343–58.
29.
GilliamFranklin D.JrIyengarShanto. 2000. “Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public.” American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 560–73.
30.
GiustozziAntonio. 2014. “The Taliban’s ‘Military Courts.’” Small Wars & Insurgencies250 (2): 284–96.
31.
GonzalezFelipePremMounu. 2018. “Can Television Bring Down a Dictator? Evidence from Chile’s ‘No’ Campaign.” Journal of Comparative Economics46 (1): 349–61.
JacksonAshley. 2018. “Life under the Taliban Shadow Government.” Technical report, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
34.
JonesRobert W.2006. “Psyop in Colombia.” Veritas20 (4): 95–98.
35.
KalyvasStathis N.2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KalyvasStathis N.2015. “Rebel Governance during the Greek Civil War, 1942-1949.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaA.KasfirN.MampillyZ., 119–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KotsonourisMary. 1994. Retreat from Revolution: The Dail Courts, 1920-24. Dublin, Ireland: Irish Academic Press.
38.
LambChristopher. 2005. Review of Psychological Operations Lessons Learned from Recent Operational Experience. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
39.
MacfarlaneJulie. 2007. “Working towards Restorative Justice in Ethiopia: Integrating Traditional Conflict Resolution Systems with the Formal Legal System.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution8 (2): 487–510.
40.
MalletElizabeth Ellen. 1997. “Propaganda and Psychological Operations as Tools of Warfare during the Persian Gulf Conflict, 1990–91.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs10 (2): 280–97.
41.
MikulaschekChristophPantSaurabhTesfayeBeza. 2020. “Winning Hearts and Minds in Civil Wars: Governance, Leadership Change, and Support for Violent Groups in Iraq.” American Journal of Political Science64: 773–90.
42.
MunozJordiFalco-GimenoAlbertHernandezEnrique. 2020. “Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference.” Political Analysis28 (2): 186–206.
MutzDiana C.2007. “Effects of ‘In-your-face’ Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition.” American Political Science Review101 (4): 621–35.
45.
MvukiyeheEric. 2017. “Can Media Interventions Reduce Gender Gaps in Political Participation after Civil War?” Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
OlkenBenjamin A.2009. “Do Television and Radio Destroy Social Capital? Evidence from Indonesian Villages.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1 (4): 1–33.
50.
OpasinaOladapo Kayode. 2017. “Legal Pluralism in Contemporary States: Between Traditional and Formal Justice Mechanisms in Nigeria and Côte d’Ivoire.” Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation (1): 1–20.
51.
OstromElinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
PhillipsBrian J.2017. “Inequality and the Emergence of Vigilante Organizations: The Case of Mexican Autodefensas.” Comparative Political Studies50 (10): 1358–89.
54.
PuhaniPatrick A.2012. “The Treatment Effect, the Cross Difference, and the Interaction Term in Nonlinear ‘Difference-in-differences’ Models.” Economics Letters115 (1): 85–87.
55.
RafiH.2002. Loya Jirga. Peshawar, Pakistan: Aman.
56.
RossMichael L.2015. “What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse?” Annual Review of Political Science18 (1): 239–59.
57.
RuttigThomas. 2013. Some Things Got Better, How Much Got Good? A Review of 12 Years of International Intervention in Afghanistan. Kabul, Afghanistan: Afghanistan Analysts Network.
58.
SageAndre Le. 2005. Stateless Justice in Somalia: Formal and Informal Rule of Law Initiatives. Geneva, Switzerland: Center for Humanitarian Dialogue.
SinghDanny. 2015. “Explaining Varieties of Corruption in the Afghan Justice Sector.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding9 (2): 231–55.
61.
SkarbekDavid. 2011. “Governance and Prison Gangs.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 702–16.
62.
StewartMegan A.2017. “Civil War as State-making: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization72 (1): 1–22.
63.
SwensonGeoffrey. 2017. “Why U.S. Efforts to Promote the Rule of Law in Afghanistan Failed.” International Security42 (1): 114–51.
64.
TillyCharles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by RueschemeyerDietrichEvansPeter B., 169–91. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
TondiniMatteo. 2007. “Rebuilding the System of Justice in Afghanistan: A Preliminary Assessment.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding10 (3): 333–54.
67.
WardakAli. 2003. Jirga: A Traditional Mechanism of Conflict Resolution in Afghanistan. Pontypridd, UK: The University of Glamorgan.
68.
WardakAli. 2004. “Building a Post-war Justice System in Afghanistan.” Crime, Law & Social Change41:319–41.
69.
WarrenT. Camber. 2014. “Not by the Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty.” International Organization68 (1): 111–41.
70.
WarrenT. Camber. 2015. “Explosive Connections? Mass Media, Social Media, and the Geography of Collective Violence in African States.” Journal of Peace Research52 (3): 297–311.
71.
WarrenZachHopkinsNancy. 2014. “Afghanistan in 2014: A Survey of the Afghan People.” Technical report, The Asia Foundation, Kabul, Afghanistan.
72.
Yanagizawa-DrottDavid. 2014. “Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics1290 (4): 1947–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
