What is the legacy of war, violence, and displacement on altruism toward diverse populations suffering similar hardships today? Prior research suggests these hardships have the potential to increase empathy that can in turn motivate altruism across identity boundaries. We test this hypothesis using survey data collected in 2017 from over 2,000 Syrians living in rebel-held regions where many internally displaced persons (IDPs) sought refuge. We find that Syrians previously exposed to violence were more likely to host IDPs. Using a conjoint experiment to measure hosting preferences over different types of IDPs, we show that these individuals also preferred to host sick and vulnerable IDPs and outgroup IDPs from the Kurdish ethnic minority. However, they were less likely to host IDPs from the Christian minority, possibly due to their association with the government. These results suggest that empathy and politics both play an important role in shaping the relationship between violence, altruism, and intergroup behavior during conflict.
AdidaClaire L.LoAdelinePlatasMelina R.. 2018. “Perspective Taking can Promote Short-term Inclusionary Behavior toward Syrian Refugees.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115 (38): 9521–26.
2.
al TamimiAymenn. 2017. “Success for al-Qaida in Syria?” Perspectives on Terrorism11 (6): 131–39.
3.
BaczkoAdamDorronsoroGillesQuesnayArthur. 2018. Civil War in Syria: Mobilization and Competing Social Orders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BalancheFabrice. 2018. Sectarianism in Syria’s Civil War. Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
5.
BatesonRegina. 2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation.” American Political Science Review106 (03): 570–87.
6.
BatsonC. DanielOlesonKathryn C.. 1991. “Current Status of the Empathy-altruism Hypothesis.” In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by ClarkM. S., vol. 12, 62–85. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
BatsonC. DanielPowellAdam A.. 2003. “Altruism and Prosocial Behavior.” In Handbook of Psychology, edited by MillonT.LernerM. J., vol. 5, 463–84. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BauerMichalBlattmanChristopherChytilováJulieHenrichJosephMiguelEdwardMittsTamar. 2016. “Can War Foster Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives30 (3): 249–74.
9.
BauerMichalCassarAlessandraChytilováJulieHenrichJoseph. 2014. “War’s Enduring Effects on the Development of Egalitarian Motivations and In-group Biases.” Psychological Science25 (1): 47–57.
10.
BeberBerndRoesslerPhilipScaccoAlexandra. 2014. “Intergroup Violence and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Dividing Sudan.” Journal of Politics76 (3): 649–65.
11.
BellowsJohnMiguelEdward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93 (11): 1144–57.
12.
BenjaminiYoavHochbergYosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)57 (1): 289–300.
13.
BertiBenedettaParisJonathan. 2014. “Beyond Sectarianism: Geopolitics, Fragmentation, and the Syrian Civil War.” Strategic Assessment16 (4): 14.
14.
BlattmanChristopher. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review103 (2): 231–47.
15.
ChoiJung-KyooBowlesSamuel. 2007. “The Coevolution of Parochial Altruism and War.” Science318 (5850): 636–40.
16.
DagherSam. 2012. “Syrian Conflict Draws in Christians.” Wall Street Journal, July 23.
17.
De WaalFrans B. M. 2008. “Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy.” Annual Review of Psychology59:279–300.
18.
EisenbergNancy. 2000. “Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development.” Annual Review of Psychology51 (1): 665–97.
19.
FabbeKristin E.HazlettChadSinmazdemirTolga. 2017. “When Exit is an Option: Effects of Indiscriminate Violence on Attitudes among Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” Harvard Business School Working Paper, 18–24.
20.
GilliganMichael J.PasqualeBenjamin J.SamiiCyrus. 2014. “Civil War and Social Cohesion: Lab-in-the-field Evidence from Nepal.” American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 604–19.
21.
GunterMichael M.2015. “Iraq, Syria, Isis and the Kurds: Geostrategic Concerns for the U.S. and Turkey.” Middle East Policy22 (1): 102–11.
22.
HaiderHuma. 2017. The Persecution of Christians in the Middle East. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
23.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.. 2014. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science17:225–49.
24.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2013. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22 (1): 1–30.
25.
HartmanAlexandra C.MorseBenjamin S.2020. “Violence, Empathy and Altruism: Evidence from the Ivorian Refugee Crisis in Liberia.” British Journal of Political Science50 (2): 731–55.
26.
Hirsch-HoeflerSivanCanettiDaphnaRapaportCarmitHobfollStevan E.. 2016. “Conflict will Harden Your Heart: Exposure to Violence, Psychological Distress, and Peace Barriers in Israel and Palestine.” British Journal of Political Science46 (04): 845–59.
27.
HjortJonas. 2014. “Ethnic Divisions and Production in Firms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1899–946.
28.
HoriuchiYusakuMarkovichZacharyYamamotoTeppei. 2018. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper no. 2018-2015. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
29.
International Crisis Group. 2012. “Tentative Jihad: Syria’s Fundamentalist Opposition.” Middle East Report 131. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group.
30.
International Crisis Group. 2013. “Syria’s Kurds: A Struggle Within a Struggle.” Middle East Report 136. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group.
31.
JenkinsBrian Michael. 2014. The Dynamics of Syria’s Civil War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
32.
MironovaVeraWhittSam. 2016. “The Evolution of Prosociality and Parochialism after Violence.” Journal of Peace Research53 (5): 648–64.
33.
MousaSalma. 2020. “Building Social Cohesion between Christians and Muslims through Soccer in Post-ISIS Iraq.” Science369 (6505): 866–70.
34.
NRC/IDMC. 2018. Searching for Solutions: Lessons for Syria. Geneva, Switzerland: Norwegian Refugee Council and Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre.
35.
OsterEmily. 2019. “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics37 (2): 187–204.
36.
PaluckElizabeth LevyGreenDonald P.. 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology60:339–67.
37.
PhillipsChristopher. 2015. “Sectarianism and Conflict in Syria.” Third World Quarterly36 (2): 357–76.
38.
ScaccoAlexandraWarrenShana S.. 2018. “Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria.” American Political Science Review112 (3): 654–77.
SimonovitsGáborKezdiGaborKardosPeter. 2018. “Seeing the World through the Other’s Eye: An Online Intervention Reducing Ethnic Prejudice.” American Political Science Review112 (1): 186–93.
41.
StaubErvinVollhardtJohanna. 2008. “Altruism Born of Suffering: The Roots of Caring and Helping after Victimization and Other Trauma.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry78 (3): 267–80.
VollhardtJohanna Ray. 2009. “Altruism Born of Suffering and Prosocial Behavior Following Adverse Life Events: A Review and Conceptualization.” Social Justice Research22 (1): 53–97.
49.
VoorsMaarten J.NillesenEleonora E. M.VerwimpPhilipBulteErwin H.LensinkRobertSoestDaan P. Van. 2012. “Violent Conflict and Behavior: A Fid Experiment in Burundi.” American Ecelonomic Review102 (2): 941–64.
50.
WhitakerBeth Elise. 2003. “Refugees and the Spread of Conflict: Contrasting Cases in Central Africa.” Journal of Asian and African Studies38 (2-3): 211–31.
51.
WhittSamWilsonRick K.. 2007. “The Dictator Game, Fairness and Ethnicity in Postwar Bosnia.” American Journal of Political Science51 (3): 655–68.
52.
ZisserEyal. 2017. “Syria—From the Six Day War to the Syrian Civil War.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies44 (4): 545–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
