A wealth of literature argues that domestic institutions can sometimes restrain government repression. In this article, we highlight an institution tasked specifically with protecting and promoting human rights: the National Human Rights Institution (NHRI). Although common international standards exist, NHRIs exhibit substantial variation in their organization, the rights that they protect, the activities they permit, and the manner in which they appoint their members. Scholarship to date has conceptualized and measured NHRIs dichotomously; an NHRI either exists or it does not. We present data that highlights NHRI heterogeneity collected via content analysis of NHRI annual reports, NHRI websites, national constitutions, government legislation, and other sources. Using these data, we show NHRIs that can publish their findings and NHRIs that can punish offenders are each associated with less state torture. These data will allow future researchers to better explore important questions regarding NHRI origins, design, processes, and effectiveness.
AllendoerferMichelle GiacobbeMurdieAmandaWelchRyan M.. 2020. “The Path of the Boomerang: Human Rights Campaigns, Third-party Pressure, and Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly64 (1): 111–19.
2.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-series Cross-section Data.” American Political Science Review89 (3): 634–47.
3.
BellSam R.Chad ClayK.MurdieAmanda. 2012. “Neighborhood Watch: Spatial Effects of Human Rights INGOs.” Journal of Politics74 (2): 354–68.
4.
CardenasSonia. 2003. “Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions.” Global Governance9 (1): 23–42.
5.
CardenasSonia. 2012. “National Human Rights Institutions and State Compliance.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 29–51. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CardenasSonia. 2014. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
CarverRichard. 2004. Performance and Legitimacy: National Human Rights Institutions. Versoix, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy.
8.
CarverRichard. 2005. Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions. International Council on Human Rights Policy. Accessed September 10, 2018. http://www.ichrp.org/en/projects/125.
9.
CarverRichard. 2010. “A New Answer to an Old Question: National Human Rights Institutions and the Domestication of International Law.” Human Rights Law Review10 (1): 1–32.
10.
CarverRichard. 2012. “National Human Rights Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe: The Ombudsman as Agent of International Law.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 181–209. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ChengHing Yong. 1968. “The Emergence and Spread of the Ombudsman Institution.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science377 (1): 20–30.
12.
ChiltonAdam S.VersteegMila. 2016. “Do Constitutional Rights Make a Difference.” American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 575–89.
13.
CingranelliDavid L.FilippovMikhail. 2010. “Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human Rights.” Journal of Politics72 (1): 243–57.
14.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.Chad ClayK.. 2014. “CIRI Human Rights Data Project: Short Variable Descriptions for Indicators in The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset.” Accessed June 23, 2016. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxDpF6GQ-6fbY25CYVRIOTJ2MHM/edit.
15.
ColeWade M.RamirezFrancisco O.. 2013. “Conditional Decoupling: Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981-2004.” American Sociological Review78 (4): 702–25.
ConradCourtenay R.HaglundJillienneMooreWill H.. 2013. “Disaggregating Torture Allegations: Introducing the Ill-treatment and Torture (ITT) Country-year (CY) Data.” International Studies Perspectives14 (2): 199–220.
18.
ConradCourtenay R.HaglundJillienneMooreWill H.. 2014. “Torture Allegations as Events Data: Introducing the Ill-treatment and Torture (ITT) Specific Allegation Data.” Journal of Peace Research51 (3): 429–38.
19.
ConradCourtenay R.MooreWill H.. 2010. “What Stops the Torture?” American Journal of Political Science54 (2): 459–76.
20.
ConradCourtenay R.RitterEmily Hencken. 2019. Contentious Compliance: Dissent and Repression under International Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
CreamerCosette D.SimmonsBeth A.. 2015. “Ratification, Reporting, and Rights: Quality of Participation in the Convention Against Torture.” Human Rights Quarterly37:579.
22.
CreamerCosette D.SimmonsBeth A.. 2018. “The Dynamic Impact of Periodic Review on Women’s Rights.” Law and Contemporary Problems81:31.
23.
DaiXinyuan. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization59 (2): 363–98.
24.
DavenportChristian. 2007a. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science10:1–27.
25.
DavenportChristian. 2007b. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
de BecoGauthierMurrayRachel. 2015. A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DeMerittJacqueline H. R.2012. “International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives?” International Interactions38 (1): 1–25.
29.
DownsGeorge W.RockeDavid M.BarsoomPeter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization50 (3): 379–406.
30.
EckKristineFarissChristopher J.. 2018. “Ill Treatment and Torture in Sweden: A Critique of Cross-case Comparisons.” Human Rights Quarterly40 (3): 591–604.
31.
EsareyJustinDeMerittJacqueline H. R.. 2017. “Political Context and the Consequences of Naming and Shaming for Human Rights Abuse.” International Interaction43 (4): 589–618.
32.
FarissChristopher J.2018. “The Changing Standard of Accountability and the Positive Relationship between Human Rights Treaty Ratification and Compliance.” British Journal of Political Science48 (1): 239–71.
33.
FarissChristopher J.2019. “Yes, Human Rights Practices Are Improving over Time.” American Political Science Review113 (3): 868–81.
34.
FranklinJames C.2008. “Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America.” International Studies Quarterly52 (1): 187–211.
35.
GoodmanRyanPegramThomas. 2012a. Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GoodmanRyanPegramThomas. 2012b. “Introduction: National Human Rights Institutions, State Conformity, and Social Change.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 1–26. New York: Cambridge University Press.
HaddenTom. 2000. “The Role of a National Commission in the Protection of Human Rights.” In Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices, edited by HossainKamalBesselinkLeonard F. M.SelassieHaileSelassieGebreVolkerEdmond, 864. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Law International.
39.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.2008. “Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming and the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.” International Organization62 (4): 689–716.
40.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.TsutsuiKiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology110 (5): 1373–411.
41.
HaglundJillienneWelchRyan M.. 2020. “From Litigation to Rights: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqaa089.
42.
HathawayOona A.2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal111:1935–2042.
43.
HillDaniel W.2010. “Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior.” Journal of Politics72 (4): 1161–74.
44.
HillDaniel W.MooreWill H.MukherjeeBumba. 2013. “Information Politics v Organizational Incentives: When Are INGO’s “Naming and Shaming” Reports Biased?” International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 219–32.
45.
HuntLynn. 2007. Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
46.
KaufmanRisa E.2019. “Commission on Unalienabe Rights and the Effort to Erase Reproductive Rights as Human Rights.” HRLR Online4 (1): 1–18.
47.
KeithLinda Camp. 2002. “Judicial Independence and Human Rights Protection around the World.” Judicature85 (4): 195–200.
48.
KeithLinda CampNeal TateC.PoeSteven C.. 2009. “Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse?” Journal of Politics71 (2): 644–60.
49.
KimDongwook. 2013. “International Nongovernmental Organizations and the Global Diffusion of National Human Rights Institutions.” International Organization67:505–39.
50.
KjaerumMorten. 2003. “National Human Rights Institutions Implementing Human Rights.” In Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden, edited by SlavenskyKlaus, 631–54. Denmark: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
51.
KooJeong-WooRamirezFrancisco O.. 2009. “National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966-2004.” Social Forces87 (3): 1321–54.
52.
KoreyWilliam. 1998. NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “A Curious Grapevine”. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
53.
KumarC. Raj. 2003. “National Human Rights Institutions: Good Governance Perspectives on Institutionalization of Human Rights.” American University International Law Review19:259–300.
54.
KumarC. R.2006. “National Human Rights Institutions and Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Toward the Institutionalization and Developmentalization of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly28:755.
55.
LacatusCorina. 2019. “Explaining Institutional Strength: The Case of National Human Rights Institutions in Europe and Its Neighbourhood.” Journal of European Public Policy26 (11): 1657–77.
56.
LebovicJames H.VoetenEric. 2006. “The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNCHR.” International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 861–88.
57.
LebovicJames H.VoetenEric. 2009. “The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators.” Journal of Peace Research46 (1): 79–97.
58.
LinosKaterinaPegramTom. 2015. “Interrogating Form and Function: Designing Effective National Human Rights Institutions.” Matters of Concern Human Rights Research Papers2015/8:1–44.
59.
LinosKaterinaPegramTom. 2016. “Architects of Their Own Making: National Human Rights Institutions and the United Nations.” Human Rights Quarterly38 (4): 1109–34.
60.
LinzerDrew A.StatonJeffrey K.. 2015. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948-2012.” Journal of Law and Courts3 (2): 223–56.
61.
LongJ. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
LupuYonatan. 2013. “Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements.” International Organization67 (3): 469–503.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed RobertJaggersKeith. 2012. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012. Data Users’ Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. Accessed June 23, 2017. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2012.pdf.
65.
MertusJulie A.2009. Human Rights Matters: Local Politics and National Human Rights Institutions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66.
MertusJulie A.2012. “Evaluating NHRIs: Considering Structure, Mandate, and Impact.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 74–90. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
MillerGina LeiWelchRyan M.VonaschAndrew J.. 2019. “The Psychological Effects of State Socialization: IGO Membership Loss and Respect for Human Rights.” International Interactions45 (1): 113–43.
68.
MooreWill H.1993. “The Violent Intranational Conflict Data Project.” Conflict Processes Section Newsletter p. 3.
69.
MooreWill H.DavisDavid R.. 1995. “The Intranational Political Interactions Project.” Conflict Processes Section Newsletter, p. 2.
MurdieAmanda. 2014. Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
MurdieAmandaDavisDavid R.. 2012. “Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs.” International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 1–16.
73.
MurdieAmandaPeksenDursun. 2013. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Sanctions.” The Review of International Organizations8 (1): 33–53.
74.
MurdieAmandaPeksenDursun. 2014. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions.” Journal of Politics76 (1): 215–28.
75.
NetipatalachoochoteStanatiCiacchiAurelia ColombiHolzhackerRonald. 2020. “National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in ASEAN: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection Capacity and Impacts on Performances of NHRIs in the Philippines and Thailand.” European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance7 (2): 117–67.
76.
OkaforObiora Chinedu. 2012. “National Human Rights Institutions in Anglophone Africa: Legalism, Popular Agency, and the “Voices of the Suffering”.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 124–49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77.
OkaforO. C.AgbakwaS. C.. 2002. ““On Legalism, Popular Agency and” Voices of Suffering: The Nigerian National Human Rights Commission in Context.” Human Rights Quarterly24 (3): 662–720.
78.
PegramThomas. 2010. “Diffusion across Political Systems: The Global Spread of National Human Rights Institutions.” Human Rights Quarterly32 (3): 729–60.
79.
PegramThomas. 2012. “National Human Rights Institutions in Latin America: Politics and Institutionalization.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 210–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
PemsteinDanielMarquardtKyle L.TzelgovEitanWangYi tingMedzihorskyJurajKrusellJoshuaMiriFarhadRömerJohannes von. 2020. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-national and Cross-temporal Expert-coded Data.” Accessed October 1, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595962.
81.
PeruzzottiEnrique. 2012. “The Socialization of Horizontal Accountability: Rights Advocacy and the Defensor del Pueblo de la Nacion in Argentina.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 243–69. New York: Cambridge University Press.
82.
PohjolainenAnna-Elina. 2006. The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions—The Role of the United Nations. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Danish Institute for Human Rights.
83.
PowellEmilia J.StatonJeffrey K.. 2009. “Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation.” International Studies Quarterly53 (1): 149–74.
84.
RadhakrishnanAkilaSarverElena. 2019. “Canary in the Coal Mine: Abortion and the Commission on Unalienable Rights.” HRLR Online4 (1): 143–72.
85.
RamcharanBertrand G., Ed. 2005. The Ombudsman, Good Governance, and the International Human Rights System. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
86.
ReifLinda C.2000. “Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection.” Harvard Human Rights Journal13:1–69.
87.
ReifLinda C.2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance, and the International Human Rights System. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Press.
88.
ReifLinda C.2012. “The Shifting Boundaries of NHRI Definition in the International System.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 52–73. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89.
RisseMathias. 2020. “On American Values, Unalienable Rights, and Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Pompeo Commission.” Ethics and International Affairs34 (1): 13–31.
90.
RonJamesRamosHowardRodgersKathleen. 2005. “Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986-2000.” International Studies Quarterly49 (3): 557–88.
91.
ScarryElaine. 1985. The Body in Pain. New York: Oxford University Press.
92.
SidotiChris. 2012. “National Human Rights Institutions and the International Human Rights System.” In Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas. New York: Cambridge University Press.
93.
SimmonsBeth A.2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
94.
SmithAnne. 2006. “The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing?” Human Rights Quarterly28 (4): 904–46.
95.
SteinerteElinaMurrayRachel. 2009. “Same but Different? National Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Institutions as National Preventive Mechanisms under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights25 (2): 54–82.
UgglaFredrik. 2012. “Through Pressure or Persuasion?: Explaining Compliance with the Resolutions of the Bolivian Defensor del Pueblo.” In Globalization: Critical Reflections, edited by GoodmanRyanPegramThomas, 270–96. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Von SteinJana. 2018. “Exploring the Universe of UN Human Rights Agreements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (4): 871–99.
100.
WelchRyan M. 2017. “National Human Rights Institutions: Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Law.” Journal of Human Rights16 (1): 96–116.
101.
WelchRyan M.2019. “Domestic Politics and the Power to Punish: The Case of National Human Rights Institutions.” Conflict Management and Peace Science36 (4): 385–404.
102.
WelchRyan M.ConradCourtenay R.DeMerittJacqueline H. R.MooreWill H.. 2014. “Intercoder Reliability (ICR) Assessment for the National Human Rights Insitution (NHRI) Data Collection Project: Organizational Data.” Accessed January 15, 2015. https://nhridata.weebly.com/under-the-hood.html.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
