Does propaganda reduce the rate of popular protest in autocracies? To answer this question, we draw on an original dataset of state-run newspapers from thirty countries, encompassing six languages and over four million articles. We find that propaganda diminishes the rate of protest, and that its effects persist over time. By increasing the level of pro-regime propaganda by one standard deviation, autocrats have reduced the odds of protest the following day by 15%. The half-life of this effect is between five and ten days, and very little of the initial effect persists after one month. This temporal persistence is remarkably consistent with campaign advertisements in democracies.
AdenaMajaEnikolopovRubenPetrovaMariaSantarosaVeronicaZhuravskayaEkaterina. 2015. “Radio and the Rise of the Nazis in Prewar Germany.” Quarterly Journal of Economics130 (4): 1885–939.
2.
AlthausScott L.BramlettBrittany H.GimpelJames G.. 2012. “When War Hits Home: The Geography of Military Losses and Support for War in Time and Space.” Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (3): 382–412.
3.
AnandarajanMuruganHillChelseyNolanThomas. 2019. Practical Text Analysis: Maximizing the Value of Text Data, Vol. 2. New York: Springer.
4.
BeaulieuEmily. 2014. Electoral Protest and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlaydesLisa. 2008. Authoritarian Elections and Elite Management: Theory and Evidence from Egypt. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
6.
BleckJaimieMichelitchKristin. 2017. “Capturing the Airwaves, Capturing the Nation? A Field Experiment on State-run Media Effects in the Wake of a Coup.” Journal of Politics79 (3): 873–89.
7.
BoasTaylor C. F.HidalgoDaniel. 2011. “Controlling the Airwaves: Incumbency Advantage and Community Radio in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science55 (4): 869–85.
8.
BrancatiDawn. 2016. Democracy Protests: Origins, Features, and Significance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrownleeJason. 2007. Durable Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CarterErin BaggottCarterBrett L.. 2020. Propaganda in Autocracies. Cambridge, MA: R&R, Cambridge University Press.
11.
ChenXi. 2012. Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ChenowethEricaStephanMaria J.. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University.
13.
ChenowethEricaUlfelderJay. 2017. “Can Structural Conditions Explain the Onset of Nonviolent Uprisings?” Journal of Conflict Resolution61 (2): 298–324.
14.
ChristensenDarinGarfiasFrancisco. 2018. “Can You Hear Me Now? How Communication Technology Affects Protest and Repression.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science13:89–117.
15.
CookThomas D.FlayBrian R.. 1978. “The Persistance of Experimentally Induced Attitude Change.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology11:1–57.
16.
DellaVignaStefanoGentzkowMatthew. 2010. “Persuasion: Empirical Evidence.” Annual Review of Economics2:643–69.
17.
DellaVignaStefanoKaplanEthan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics122 (3): 1187–234.
18.
DeMarzoPeter M.VayanosDimitriZwiebelJeffrey. 2003. “Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics118 (3): 909–68.
19.
DongZhendongDongQiang. 2014. “Positive and Negative Valence Dictionaries.” HowNet. Accessed January 1, 2020. www.keenage.com.
20.
EnikolopovRubenPetrovaMariaZhuravskayaEkaterina. 2011. “Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia.” American Economic Review101 (7): 3253–85.
21.
EpsteinDavidBatesRobert H.GoldstoneJackKristensenIdaO’HalloranSharyn. 2005. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science59:551–69.
22.
EysterErikRabinMatthew. 2009 “Rational and Naive Herding.” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 7351.
23.
FearonJames D.2011. “Self-enforcing Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics126 (4): 1661–708.
24.
FieldAnjalieKligerDoronWintnerShulyPanJenniferJurafskyDanTsvetkovYulia. 2018. “Framing and Agenda-setting in Russian News: A Computational Analysis of Intricate Political Strategies.” Proceedings of EMNLP, 3570–80. Association for Computational Linguistics.
25.
FuDiana. 2018. Mobilizing Without the Masses: Control and Contention in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GallagherMary E.MillerBlake. 2019. Who Not What: The Logic of China’s Information Control Strategy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
27.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GeddesBarbaraWrightJosephFrantzErica. 2018. How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GehlbachScottSoninKonstantin. 2014. “Government Control of the Media.” Journal of Public Economics118:163–71.
30.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.. 2006. “Media Bias and Reputation.” Journal of Political Economy114 (2): 280–316.
31.
GerberAlan S.GimpelJames G.GreenDonald P.ShawDaron R.. 2011. “How Large and Long-lasting are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review105:135–50.
HassanMai. 2016. “The Strategic Shuffle: Ethnic Geography, the Internal Security Apparatus, and Elections in Kenya.” American Journal of Political Science61 (2): 382–95.
34.
HayesAndrew F.MyersTeresa A.. 2009. “Testing the Proximate Casualties Hypothesis: Local Troop Loss, Attention to News, and Support for Military Intervention.” Mass Communication and Society12:379–402.
35.
HealyAndrew J.MalhotraNeilMoCecilia Hyunjung. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA107 (29): 12804–09.
36.
HillSeth J.LoJamesVavreckLynnZallerJohn. 2013. “How Quickly We Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects from Mass Communication.” Political Communication30:521–47.
37.
HowardPhilip N.HussainMuzammil M.. 2013. Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
HuangHaifeng. 2015. “Propaganda as Signaling.” Comparative Politics47 (4): 419–44.
39.
JowettGarth S.O’DonnellVictoria. 2012. Propaganda and Persuasion. London, UK: Sage.
40.
KaradenizTalhaDogduErdogan. 2018. “Improvement of General Inquirer Features with Quantity Analysis.” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2228–31. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
41.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret E.. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review107 (2): 326–43.
42.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret E.. 2017. “How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, not Engaged Argument.” American Political Science Review111 (3): 484–501.
43.
KnutsenCarl HenrikMoklievHavardWigNygard Tore. 2017. “Autocratic Elections: Stabilizing Tool or Force for Change?” World Politics69 (1): 98–143.
44.
KnutsenCarl HenrikNygardHavard Mokliev. 2015. “Institutional Characteristics and Regime Survival: Why Are Semi-democracies Less Durable Than Autocracies and Democracies?” American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 656–70.
45.
KuranTimur. 1989. “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution.” Public Choice61 (1): 41–74.
46.
KuranTimur. 1997. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
LawsonChappellMcCannJames A.. 2005. “Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science35:1–30.
48.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LittleAndrew T.2017. “Propaganda and Credulity.” Games and Economic Behavior102:224–32.
50.
LohmannSusanne. 1993. “A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.” American Political Science Review87 (2): 319–33.
51.
Lust-OkarEllen. 2006. “Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan.” Democratization13 (3): 456–71.
52.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies41 (4): 715–41.
53.
MarinovNikolayGoemansHein. 2014. “Coups and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science44: 799–825.
54.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2005. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Regime Transitions, 1800-2004. Arlington: George Mason University.
55.
MartinGregory J.YurukogluAli. 2017. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” American Economic Review107 (9): 2565–99.
56.
MechkovaValeriyaPemsteinDanielSeimBrigitteWilsonSteven. 2019. “DSP [Country-Year] Dataset v9.” Digital Society Project.
57.
MullainathanSendhilSchwartzsteinJoshuaShleiferAndrei. 2008. “Coarse Thinking and Persuasion.” Quarterly Journal of Economics123 (2): 577–619.
58.
O’ConnorBrendanBalasubramanyanRamnathRoutledgeBryan R.SmithNoah A.. 2010. “From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 1–8. Washington, DC: ICWSM.
59.
QinBeiStrömbergDavidWuYanhui. 2017. “Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests vs. Surveillance and Propaganda.” Journal of Economic Perspectives31 (1): 117–40.
60.
QinBeiStrömbergDavidWuYanhui. 2018. “Media Bias in China.” American Economic Review108 (9): 2442–76.
61.
RaleighClionadhLinkeAndrewHegreHøavardKarlsenJoakim. 2010. “Introducing ACLED-armed Conflict Location and Event Data.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 651–60.
RobertsMargaret E.2018. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
RosenfeldBryn. 2017. “Reevaluating the Middle-class Protest Paradigm: A Case-control Study of Democratic Protest Coalitions in Russia.” American Political Science Review111 (4): 637–52.
65.
RozenasArturasStukalDenis. 2019. “How Autocrats Manipulate Economic News: Evidence from Russia’s State-controlled Television.” Journal of Politics81 (3): 982–96.
66.
RydzakJan. 2019. Of Blackouts and Bandhs: The Strategy and Structure of Disconnected Protest in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
67.
ShadmehrMehdiBernhardtDan. 2015. “State Censorship.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics7 (2): 280–308.
68.
SidesJohnVavreckLynn. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Election. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
SlaterDan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Princeton University Press.
70.
StanleyJason. 2015. How Propaganda Works. New York: Princeton University Press.
71.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZachary C.MocanuDeliaVespignaniAlessandroFowlerJames. 2015. “Online Social Networks and Offline Protest.” EPJ Data Science4 (19): 1–9.
72.
SvolikMilan W.2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
73.
TaylorRichard. 1998. Film Propaganda: Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. New York: I.B. Tauris.
74.
TrejoGuillermo. 2014. “The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies.” Perspectives on Politics12 (2): 332–52.
75.
TruexRory. 2019. “Focal Points, Dissident Calendars, and Preemptive Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (4): 1032–52.
76.
TuckerJoshua A.2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics5 (3): 535–51.
77.
TufekciZeynepWilsonChristopher. 2012. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication62:363–79.
78.
TullockGordon. 1987. Autocracy. New York: Springer.
79.
WedeenLisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
80.
WhiteStephenOatesSarahMcAllisterIan. 2005. “Media Effects and Russian Elections.” British Journal of Political Science35 (2): 191–208.
81.
WigTore EspenRodGeelmuyden. 2016. “Cues to Coup Plotters: Elections as Coup Triggers in Dictatorships.” Journal of Conflict Resolution60 (5): 787–812.
82.
Yanagizawa-DrottDavid. 2014. “Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide.” Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1947–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
