Do human rights organizations (HROs) aid the consolidation of democracy in post-authoritarian states? It is often argued that these groups contribute to accountability for past repression. Yet HROs can have unintended consequences if they threaten the interests of powerful domestic institutions. This paper develops a simple model of human rights activism in post-authoritarian states. Civilian governments in these states trade off support from the military and human rights activists which seek to punish the military. Counterintuitively, the model predicts human rights activists make amnesty for the military more likely, as activists tempt the government to punish the military and the military becomes more likely to intervene in politics. The model’s implications are tested using a sample of post-authoritarian states from 1970-2010. Results show that more HRO influence increases the likelihood of amnesty laws and military involvement in government, though HROs may achieve justice through pathways such as truth commissions.
AguilarPalomaBalcellsLaiaCebollaHector. 2011. “Determinants of Attitudes towards Transitional Justice: An Empirical Analysis of the Spanish Case.” Comparative Political Studies44 (10): 1397–430.
2.
ArceGerardo Alberto. 2010. “Armed Forces, Truth Commission, and Transitional Justice in Peru.” Sur: International Journal on Human Rights7 (3): 27–49.
3.
BellSam R.Chad ClayK.MurdieAmanda. 2019. “Join the Chorus, Avoid the Spotlight: The Effect of Neighborhood and Social Dynamics on Human Rights Organization Shaming.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (1): 167–93.
4.
BerlinMark S.DancyGeoff. 2017. “The Difference Law Makes: Domestic Atrocity Laws and Human Rights Prosecutions.” Law and Society Review51 (3): 533–66.
5.
CheibubJose AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143:67–101.
6.
ConradCourtenayRitterEmily Hencken. 2019. Contentious Compliance: Dissent and Repression under International Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
DancyGeoffMarchesiBridget E.OlsenTricia D.PayneLeigh A.ReiterAndrew G.SikkinkKathryn. 2019. “Behind Bars and Bargains: New Findings on Transitional Justice in Emerging Democracies.” International Studies Quarterly63 (1): 99–110.
9.
DancyGeoffLessaFrancescaMarchesiBridgetPayneLeigh A.PereiraGabriel2014Kathryn Sikkink.. “The Transitional Justice Research Collaborative Dataset.” Accessed July 15, 2019. www.transtionaljusticedata.com.
10.
DancyGeoffMichelVeronica. 2016. “Human Rights Enforcement From Below: Private Actors and Prosecutorial Momentum in Latin America and Europe.” International Studies Quarterly60 (1): 173–88.
11.
DavenportChristian. 2007. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DavidRomanChoiSusanne Y. P.. 2006. “Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (3): 339–67.
13.
Escribà-FolchAbelKrcmaricDaniel. 2017. “Dictators in Exile: Explaining the Destinations of Ex-rulers.” Journal of Politics79 (2): 560–75.
14.
Escribà-FolchAbelWrightJoseph. 2015a. “Human Rights Prosecutions and Autocratic Survival.” International Organization69 (2): 343–73.
15.
Escribà-FolchAbelWrightJoseph. 2015b. Foreign Pressure and the Politics of Autocratic Survival. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization52 (Autumn): 887–917.
17.
FreemanMark. 2009. Necessary Evils: Amnesty and the Search for Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GeddesBarbaraWrightJosephFrantzErica. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdowns and Regime Transitions.” Perspectives on Politics12 (2): 313–31.
19.
GibsonJames L.2004. “Does Truth Lead to Reconciliation? Testing the Causal Assumptions of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Process.” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 201–17.
20.
GisselquistRachel M.2008. “Democratic Transition and Democratic Survival in Benin.” Democratization15 (4): 789–814.
21.
Gonzalez-OcantosEzequiel. 2014. “Persuade Them or Oust Them: Crafting Judicial Change and Transitional Justice in Argentina.” Comparative Politics46 (4): 479–98.
22.
GreensteinClaireHarveyCole J.. 2017. “Trials, Lustration, and Clean Elections: The Uneven Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms on Electoral Manipulation.” Democratization24 (6): 1195–214.
HansfordThomas G.GomezBrad T.. 2010. “Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review104 (2): 268–88.
25.
HunterWendy. 1998. “Negotiating Civil-military Relations in Post-authoritarian Argentina and Chile.” International Studies Quarterly42 (2): 295–318.
26.
JaskoskiMaiah. 2012. “Civilian Control of the Armed Forces in Democratic Latin America: Military Prerogatives, Contestation, and Mission Performance in Peru.” Armed Forces & Society38 (1): 70–91.
27.
KeckMargaret E.SikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
KimHun Joon. 2012. “Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions after Democratic Transitions.” Journal of Peace Research49 (2): 305–20.
29.
KrcmaricDaniel. 2018. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Leaders, Exile, and the Dilemmas of International Justice.” American Journal of Political Science62 (2): 486–98.
30.
KruijtDirk. 2001. “Low Intensity Democracies: Latin America in the Post-dictatorial Era.” Bulletin of Latin American Research20 (4): 409–30.
31.
LaplanteLisa J.TheidonKimberly. 2007. “Truth with Consequences: Justice and Reparations in Post-truth Commission Peru.” Human Rights Quarterly29 (1): 228–50.
32.
LupuNoamPeisakhinLeonid. 2017. “The Legacy of Political Violence across Generations.” American Journal of Political Science61 (4): 836–51.
33.
MallinderLouise. 2016. “The End of Amnesty or Regional Overreach: Interpreting the Erosion of South America’s Amnesty Laws.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly65 (3): 645–80.
34.
MuñozJosé. 2006. “International Opportunities and Domestic Protest: Zapatistas, Mexico and the New World Economy.” Social Movement Studies5 (3): 251–74.
35.
MurdieAmandaDavisDavid R.. 2012. “Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs.” International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 1–16.
36.
NalepaMonika. 2010. “Captured Commitments: An Analytic Narrative of Transitions with Transitional Justice.” World Politics62 (2): 341–80.
37.
NinoCarlos S.1991. “The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentina.” The Yale Law Journal100 (8): 2619–40.
38.
NoblesMelissa. 2010. “The Prosecution of Human Rights Violations.” Annual Review of Political Science13:165–82.
39.
OlsenTricia D.PayneLeigh A.ReiterAndrew G.Wiebelhaus-BrahmEric. 2010. “When Truth Commissions Improve Human Rights.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice4 (3): 457–76.
40.
OsielMark J.2000. “Why Prosecute-critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity.” Human Rights Quarterly22 (1): 118–47.
41.
PayneLeigh A.LessaFrancescaPereiraGabriel. 2015. “Overcoming Barriers to Justice in the Age of Human Rights Accountability.” Human Rights Quarterly37 (3): 728–54.
42.
PegramThomas. 2008. “Accountability in Hostile Times: The Case of the Peruvian Human Rights Ombudsman 1996-2001.” Journal of Latin American Studies40 (1): 51–82.
43.
PierskallaJan Henryk. 2010. “Protest, Deterrence, and Escalation: The Strategic Calculus of Government Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54 (1): 117–45.
44.
Pion-BerlinDavid. 1994. “To Prosecute or to Pardon: Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone.” Human Rights Quarterly105 (1): 105–30.
45.
Pion-BerlinDavidMartínezRafael. 2017. Soldiers, Politicians, and Civilians: Reforming Civil-Military Relations in Democratic Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PowellJonathan M.ThyneClayton L.. 2011. “Global Instances of Coups from 1950-Present.” Journal of Peace Research48 (2): 249–59.
47.
RitterEmily HenckenConradCourtenay R.. 2016. “Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression.” The American Political Science Review110 (1): 85–99.
48.
RootRebecca K.2009. “Through the Window of Opportunity: The Transitional Justice Network in Peru.” Human Rights Quarterly31 (2): 452–73.
49.
RozenasArturasSchutteSebastianZhukovYuri. 2017. “The Political Legacy of Violence: The Long-term Impact of Stalin’s Repression in Ukraine.” Journal of Politics79 (4): 1147–61.
50.
SharmanJason Campbell. 2017. The Despot’s Guide to Wealth Management: On the International Campaign Against Grand Corruption. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
SikkinkKathrynWallingCarrie Booth. 2007. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research44 (4): 427–55.
52.
SikkinkKathrynKimHun Joon. 2013. “The Justice Cascade: The Origins and Effectiveness of Prosecutions of Human Rights Violations.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science9:269–85.
53.
SkaarElin. 1999. “Truth Commissions, Trials, or Nothing? Policy Options in Democratic Transitions.” Third World Quarterly20 (6): 1195–214.
54.
SmithJackieWiestDawn. 2005. “The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association.” Social Forces84 (2): 621–52.
55.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie. 2003. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security28 (3): 5–44.
56.
StepanAlfred. 1986. “Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and Comparative Considerations.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippeWhiteheadLaurence, 64–84. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
57.
StepanAlfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
SvolikMilan W.2014. “Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation.” British Journal of Political Science45 (4): 715–38.
59.
WhitePeter B.2017. “Crises and Crisis Generations: The Long-term Impact of International Crises on Military Political Participation.” Security Studies26 (4): 575–605.
60.
WoodReed M.GibneyMark. 2010. “The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A Re-introduction and a Comparison to CIRI.” Human Rights Quarterly32 (2): 367–400.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
