The extent of local order varies widely in rebel held areas, from total chaos to well-run governing institutions. When these institutions exist, why do some include civilian input in local affairs, while others exclude civilians from governance? I argue that rebels choose different governing strategies that maximize their utility of territorial control, based on certain characteristics of civilian inhabitants populating the territory. Rebels’ constituency determines whether rebels seek to govern civilians or control them solely with coercive violence, and community cohesion (or lack thereof) then determines the type of institutions that rebels develop. I focus on three different outcomes for communities under rebel control—no institutions, exclusive institutions, and inclusive institutions. I test my argument using historical, statistical, and case evidence, leveraging original cross-national data on local order in rebel held territory as well as interviews with village heads, ex-combatants, and community members in Aceh, Indonesia.
BarterS.2014. Civilian Strategy in Civil War: Insights from Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. New York: Springer.
6.
CedermanL. E.WimmerA.MinB.2010. “Why do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis.” World Politics62 (1): 87–119.
7.
ClaphamC. S.1998. African Guerrillas. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
8.
CunninghamD. E.GleditschK. S.SalehyanI.. 2013. “Non-state Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (5): 516–31.
9.
DhadaM.1993. Warriors at Work: How Guinea was Really Set Free. University of Oklahoma Press.
10.
EnglebertP.2000. “Pre-colonial Institutions, Post-colonial States, and Economic Development in Tropical Africa.” Political Research Quarterly53 (1): 7–36.
11.
GalorO.KlempM.. 2017. “Roots of Autocracy.” NBER Working Paper No. w23301, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, UK.
12.
GennaioliN.RainerI.. 2007. “The Modern Impact of Precolonial Centralization in Africa.” Journal of Economic Growth12 (3): 185–234.
13.
GleditschN. P.WallensteenP.ErikssonM.SollenbergM.StrandH.. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
14.
GoodhandJ.HulmeD.LewerN.. 2000. “Social Capital and the Political Economy of Violence: A Case Study of Sri Lanka.” Disasters24 (4): 390–406.
15.
GowrinathanN.MampillyZ.. 2019. “Resistance and Repression under the Rule of Rebels: Women, Clergy, and Civilian Agency in LTTE Governed Sri Lanka.” Comparative Politics52 (1): 1–20.
16.
HansenS. J.2013. Al-Shabaab in Somalia: The History and Ideology of a Militant Islamist Group. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
HuangR.2016. The Wartime Origins of Democratization: Civil War, Rebel Governance, and Political Regimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KalyvasS. N.2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KalyvasS. N.2015. “Rebel Governance During the Greek Civil War.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaA.KasfirN.MampillyZ., 98–119. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
KaplanO.2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KasfirN.2005. “Guerrillas and Civilian Participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981–86.” The Journal of Modern African Studies43 (2): 271–96.
23.
KasfirN.2015. “Rebel Governance–Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, Scope, Patterns, Order, Causes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaA.KasfirN.MampillyZ., 21–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KeisterJ.SlantchevB. L.. 2014. “Statebreakers to Statemakers: Strategies of Rebel Governance.” Working Paper. Accessed August 20, 2018. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.720.9759.
25.
MampillyZ. C.2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
MampillyZ.StewartM. A.. 2021. “A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 15–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720935642.
27.
MarchalR.2011. The Rise of a Jihadi Movement in a Country at War—Harakat Al-Shabaab Al Mujaheddin in Somalia. Paris: SciencesPo Paris.
MkandawireT.2002. “The Terrible Toll of Post-colonial ‘Rebel Movements’ in Africa: Towards an Explanation of the Violence against the Peasantry.” Journal of Modern African Studies40 (2): 181–215.
30.
MurdockG. P.1967. “Ethnographic Atlas: A Summary.” Ethnology6 (2): 109–236.
31.
NarayanD.2002. “Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty.” In Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-being in Developing Countries, edited by IshamJ.KellyT.RamaswamyS., 58–81. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
32.
NorthD. C.1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
OttmannM.2017. “Rebel Constituencies and Rebel Violence against Civilians in Civil Conflicts.” Conflict Management and Peace Science34 (1): 27–51.
34.
RenoW.2011. Warfare in Independent Africa, vol. 5. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RubinM. A.2020. “Rebel Territorial Control and Civilian Collective Action in Civil War: Evidence from the Communist Insurgency in the Philippines.” Journal of Conflict Resolution64 (2-3): 459–89.
36.
SalehyanI.SirokyD.WoodR. M.. 2014. “External Rebel Sponsorship and Civilian Abuse: A Principal-agent Analysis of Wartime Atrocities.” International Organization68 (3): 633–61.
37.
SartoriA. E.2003. “An Estimator for Some Binary-outcome Selection Models without Exclusion Restrictions.” Political Analysis11 (2): 111–38.
38.
StewartM. A.2018. “Civil War as State-making: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization72 (1): 205–26.
39.
TarrowS.1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
WeinsteinJ. M.2006. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
WigT.2016. “Peace from the Past: Pre-colonial Political Institutions and Civil Wars in Africa.” Journal of Peace Research53 (4): 509–24.
43.
WoodR. M.2014. “Opportunities to Kill or Incentives for Restraint? Rebel Capabilities, the Origins of Support, and Civilian Victimization in Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (5): 461–80.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
