Evidence on the consequences of war for community cohesion is mixed, pointing to both positive and negative effects of conflict. This study examines symmetry of force between warring actors as an explanation of heterogeneous conflict effects. Using survey data from 224 Colombian villages, I compare cohesion in communities exposed to asymmetric and symmetric conflicts, a guerrilla war between rebels and the state and a more conventional war between rebels and paramilitary groups, respectively. I find that symmetric war increases participation in community organizations, while asymmetric war decreases trust. Evidence suggests three mechanisms that explain these findings. Symmetric war increases cohesion (i) by spurring individuals to band together to cope with significant disruption of services and (ii) by strengthening group identities that map onto fairly clear wartime cleavages. Asymmetric war reduces cohesion (iii) by instilling fear and suspicion linked to wartime experiences of civilian collaboration and denunciations.
AltonjiJosephElderToddTaberChristopher. 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy113:151–84.
2.
ArjonaAna. 2017. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArjonaAnaChacónMario. 2018. “The Impact of Selective Violence on Political Participation: Evidence from Colombia.” Unpublished Working Paper.
4.
ÁvilaAriel. 2009. “La guerra de las FARC y la guerra contra las FARC.” Arcanos15:4–21.
5.
AvilésWilliam. 2006. “Paramilitarism and Colombia’s Low-intensity Democracy.” Journal of Latin American Studies38 (2): 379–408.
6.
BalcellsLaia. 2017. Rivalry and Revenge: The Politics of Violence during Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BalcellsLaiaKalyvasStathis. 2010. “Did Marxism Make a Difference? Marxist Rebellions and National Liberation Movements.” APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1642509.
8.
BalcellsLaiaKalyvasStathis. 2014. “Does Warfare Matter? Severity, Duration, and Outcomes of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (8): 1390–418.
9.
BanerjeeAbhijitSomanathanRohini. 2007. “The Political Economy of Public Goods: Some Evidence from India.” Journal of Development Economics82 (2): 287–314.
10.
Barclay ChildTraversNikolovaElena. 2017. “War and Social Attitudes: Revisiting Consensus Views.” HiCN Working Paper 258.
11.
BauerMichalBlattmanChristopherChytilováJulieHenrichJosephMiguelEdwardMittsTamar. 2016. “Can War Foster Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives30 (3): 249–74.
12.
BeberBerndRoesslerPhilipScaccoAlexandra. 2014. “Intergroup Violence and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Dividing Sudan.” Journal of Politics76 (3): 649–65.
13.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2010. “State Capacity, Conflict, and Development.” Econometrica78 (1): 1–34.
14.
BlattmanChristopherMiguelEdward. 2010. “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature48 (1): 3–57.
15.
BrückTilmanJustinoPatriciaVerwimpPhilipAvdeenkoAlexandraTedescoAndrew. 2015. “Measuring Violent Conflict in Micro-level Surveys: Current Practices and Methodological Challenges.” The World Bank Research Observer31:29–58.
16.
Bueno de MesquitaEthan. 2013. “Rebel Tactics.” Journal of Political Economy121 (2): 323–57.
17.
Canetti-NisimDaphnaHalperinEranSharvitKerenHobfollStevan. 2009. “A New Stress-based Model of Political Extremism: Personal Exposure to Terrorism, Psychological Distress, and Exclusionist Political Attitudes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (3): 363–89.
18.
CardenasJuan. 2003. “Real Wealth and Experimental Cooperation: Experiments in the Field Lab.” Journal of Development Economics70 (2): 263–89.
19.
CassarAlessandraGrosjeanPaulineWhittSam. 2013. “Legacies of Violence: Trust and Market Development.” Journal of Economic Growth18 (3): 285–318.
20.
CecchiFrancescoDuchoslavJan. 2018. “The Effect of Prenatal Stress on Cooperation: Evidence from Violent Conflict in Uganda.” European Economic Review101:35–56.
21.
ChakravartySurajeetFonsecaMiguelGhoshSudeepMarjitSugata. 2016. “Religious Fragmentation, Social Identity and Cooperation: Evidence from an Artefactual Field Experiment in India.” European Economic Review90:265–79.
22.
ChernickMark. 2003. “Does Injustice Cause Violence?” In What Justice? Whose Justice? Fighting for Justice in Latin America, edited by Wickham-CrowleyTimothyEcksteinSusan, 133–57. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
CilliersJacobusDubeOeindrilaSiddiqiBilal. 2016. “Reconciling after Civil Conflict Increases Social Capital but Decreases Individual Well-being.” Science352 (6287): 787–94.
24.
CollierPaul. 2000. “Rebellion as a Quasi-criminal Activity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (6): 839–53.
25.
DellMelissaQuerubinPable. 2018. “Nation Building Through Foreign Intervention: Evidence from Discontinuities in Military Strategies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics133 (2): 701–64.
26.
DerriennicJean-Pierre. 2001. Les Guerres Civiles. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
27.
TumacoDiócesis de. 2011. ¡Que nadie diga que no pasa nada! Una mirada desde la región del pacífico nariñense. Bogotá: Kimpres.
28.
DubeOeindrilaVargasJuan. 2013. “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.” Review of Economic Studies80 (4): 1384–421.
29.
FearonJamesLaitinDavid. 1996. “Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.” American Political Science Review90 (4): 715–35.
30.
FearonJamesLaitinDavid. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–86.
31.
GáfaroMargaritaIbáñezAnaJustinoPatricia. 2014. “Local Institutions and Armed Group Presence in Colombia.” HiCN Working Paper 178.
32.
GarzónJuan2008. Mafia and Co: The Criminal Networks in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. Washington, DC: Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
33.
GennaioliNicolaVothHans-Joachim. 2015. “State Capacity and Military Conflict.” Review of Economic Studies82 (4): 1409–48.
34.
GilliganMichaelPasqualeBenjaminSamiiCyrus. 2014. “Civil War and Social Cohesion: Lab-in-the-field Evidence from Nepal.” American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 604–19.
35.
GneezyAyeleyFesslerDaniel. 2012. “Conflict, Sticks and Carrots: War Increases Prosocial Punishments and Rewards.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences279 (1727): 219–23.
36.
GranadaSoledadMeertensCamilo Sánchez. 2009. “Correlación de Fuerzas en Disputas de Guerras Civiles: Una Aplicación al Caso Colombiano.” In Guerras y Violencias en Colombia. Herramientas e Interpretaciones, edited by RestrepoJorgeDavid Aponte, 233–72. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
37.
GranadaSoledadRestrepoJorgeVargasAndrés. 2009. “El Agotamiento de la Política de Seguridad: Evolución y Transformaciones Recientes en el Conflicto Armado Colombiano.” In Guerras y Violencias en Colombia. Herramientas e Interpretaciones, edited by RestrepoJorgeAponteDavid, 27–124. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
38.
GreeneSteven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly85 (1): 136–53.
39.
HistóricaGrupo de Memoria. 2013. ¡Basta Ya! Colombia: Memorias de Guerra y Dignidad. Bogotá: Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica.
40.
Gutiérrez SanínFrancisco. 2008. “Telling the Difference: Guerrillas and Paramilitaries in the Colombian War.” Politics & Society36 (1): 3–34.
41.
HagerAnselmKrakowskiKrzysztofSchaubMax. 2019. “Ethnic Riot and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan.” American Political Science Review113 (4): 1029–44.
42.
Hugh-JonesDavidZultanRo’i. 2013. “Reputation and Cooperation in Defense.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 327–55.
43.
JaramilloMarcela. 2014. “The Territorialization of Ethnopolitical Reforms in Colombia: Chocó as a Case Study.” Latin American Research Review49 (3): 126–52.
44.
KalyvasStathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KalyvasStathis. 2009. “Civil Wars.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by BoixCarlesStokesSusan, 592–615. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
KaplanOliver. 2012. “Shootings and Shamans: Local Civilian Authority Structures and Civil War Violence in Colombia.” Working Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2102751.
47.
KaplanOliver. 2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
KijewskiSaraFreitagMarkus. 2018. “Civil War and the Formation of Social Trust in Kosovo: Posttraumatic Growth or War-related Distress?” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (4): 717–42.
49.
LaqueurWalter. 1998. Guerrilla Warfare: A Historical and Critical Study. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
50.
LemaitreJulieta. 2016. “After the War: Displaced Women, Ordinary Ethics, and Grassroots Reconstruction in Colombia.” Social & Legal Studies25 (5): 545–65.
51.
LupuNoamPeisakhinLeonid. 2017. “The Legacy of Political Violence across Generations.” American Journal of Political Science61 (4): 836–51.
52.
LyallJason. 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks?: Evidence from Chechnya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (3): 331–62.
53.
MarksThomas. 2002. Colombian Army Adaptation to FARC Insurgency. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
54.
MartínezSergi. 2019. “The Legacy of Violence on Political Behaviour: The Case of the Spanish Civil War in the Basque Country.” Unpublished Working Paper.
55.
Medina GallegoCarlos. 1990. Autodefensas, Paramilitares y Narcotráfico en Colombia: Origen, Desarrollo y Consolidación: El Caso “Puerto Boyacá.”Bogotá: Documentos Periodísticos.
56.
MironovaVeraWhittSam. 2016. “The Evolution of Prosociality and Parochialism After Violence.” Journal of Peace Research53 (5): 648–64.
57.
NunnNathanWantchekonLeonard. 2011. “The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa.” American Economic Review101 (7): 3221–52.
58.
RappCarolinKijewskiSaraFreitagMarkus. 2019. “The Tolerance of Tamils: War-related Experiences, Psychological Pathways, and the Probability of Granting Civil Liberties to Former Enemies.” Journal of Politics81 (4): 1328–41.
59.
RohnerDominicThoenigMathiasZilibottiFabrizio. 2013. “Seeds of Distrust: Conflict in Uganda.” Journal of Economic Growth18 (3): 217–52.
60.
RooduijnMatthijsBurgoonBrianElsasErija vanWerfhorstHerman van de. 2017. “Radical Distinction: Support for Radical Left and Radical Right Parties in Europe.” European Union Politics18 (4): 536–59.
61.
SchutteSebastian. 2015. “Geography, Outcome, and Casualties: A Unified Model of Insurgency.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (6): 1101–28.
62.
StarkOded. 2004. “Cooperation and Wealth.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization53 (1): 109–15.
63.
SteeleAbbey. 2011. “Electing Displacement: Political Cleansing in Apartadó, Colombia.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (3): 423–45.
64.
TobónWilliam. 2001. “Colonización Armada, Poder Local y Territorialización Privada.” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies7 (2): 63–81.
65.
VélezMaríaTrujilloCarlosMorosLinaForeroClemente. 2016. “Prosocial Behavior and Subjective Insecurity in Violent Contexts: Field Experiments.” PLOS One11 (7): e0158878.
66.
VoorsMaartenNillesenEleonoraVerwimpPhilipBulteErwinLensinkRobertSoestDaan Van. 2012. “Violent Conflict and Behavior: A Field Experiment in Burundi.” American Economic Review102 (2): 941–64.
67.
WoodReedKathmanJacobGentStephen. 2012. “Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 647–60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
