Under what conditions do nonviolent demonstrations escalate to violence? I answer this question using a novel theory of individual impatience in protests that begin peacefully. Rather than considering protest groups as unitary actors, I present a theory of collective action in which a group’s decision over whether or not to engage in anti-government violence is the product of individual preferences. Individuals involved in a nonviolent demonstration use the immediacy of their needs and the sustainability of collective action to decide whether or not to initiate violence against the state. Specifically, I hypothesize that the likelihood of violent escalation will increase when the food price increases and unemployment rate is high or when the event is spontaneous. Analysis of a Bayesian multilevel model of 2,405 nonviolent demonstrations from 1991 to 2017 in Africa and Latin America supports my expectations.
ArezkiMr RabahBrucknerMarkus. 2011. “Food Prices and Political Instability.” Working paper Number 11-62, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
2.
AsalVictorGustafsonDanielKrausePeter. 2019. “It Comes with the Territory: Why States Negotiate with Ethno-political Organizations.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism42 (4): 363–82.
3.
AsalVictorLegaultRichardSzekelyOraWilkenfeldJonathan. 2013. “Gender Ideologies and Forms of Contentious Mobilization in the Middle East.” Journal of Peace Research50 (3): 305–318.
4.
BeissingerMark R.2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BellemareMarc F.2015. “Rising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics97 (1): 1–21.
6.
BrinkmanHenk-JanHendrixCullen S.. 2011. “Food Insecurity and Violent Conflict: Causes Consequences, and Addressing the Challenges.” Occasional paper 24, World Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
7.
BuckleyAnthony D.KenneyMary Catherine. 1995. Negotiating Identity: Rhetoric, Metaphor, and Social Drama in Northern Ireland. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
8.
CarpenterBobGelmanAndrewHoffmanMatthew D.LeeDanielGoodrichBenBetancourtMichaelBrubakerMarcusGuoJiqiangLiPeterRiddellAllen. 2017. “Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.” Journal of Statistical Software76 (1): 1–32.
9.
CaseyNicholas. 2017. “Venezuela Opposition Aims to Keep Protests Peaceful, but Violence Erupts.” The New York Times, April 24, 2017.
10.
CedermanLars-ErikGirardinLuc. 2007. “Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies.” American Political Science Review101 (1): 173–85.
11.
CedermanLars-ErikGleditschKristian SkredeBuhaugHalvard. 2013. Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CelestinoMauricio RiveraGleditschKristian Skrede. 2013. “Fresh Carnations or All Thorn, No Rose? Nonviolent Campaigns and Transitions in Autocracies.” Journal of Peace Research50 (3): 385–400.
13.
ChenowethEricaLewisOrion A.. 2013. “Unpacking Nonviolent Campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research50 (3): 415–23.
14.
ChenowethEricaStephanMaria J.. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
ChristiaFotini. 2012. Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ChweMichael Suk-young.2000. “Communication and Coordination in Social Networks.” Review of Economic Studies67:1–16.
17.
CollinsRandall. 2009. Violence: A Micro-sociological Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
CunninghamKathleen Gallagher. 2011. “Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists?” American Political Science Review105 (2): 275–97.
19.
CunninghamKathleen Gallagher. 2013. “Understanding Strategic Choice: The Determinants of Civil War and Nonviolent Campaign in Self-determination Disputes.” Journal of Peace Research50 (3): 291–304.
20.
CunninghamKathleen Gallagher. 2014. Inside the Politics of Self-determination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
CunninghamKathleen GallagherBeaulieuEmily. 2010. “Dissent, Repression, and Inconsistency.” In Rethinking Violence: States and Non-State Actors in Conflict, edited by ChenowethEricaLawrenceAdria, 173–96. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22.
DecetyJeanMichalskaKalina J.AkitsukiYukoLaheyBenjamin B.. 2009. “Atypical Empathic Responses in Adolescents with Aggressive Conduct Disorder: A Functional MRI Investigation.” Biological Psychology80 (2): 203–11.
23.
DeNardoJames. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FranciscoRonald A.1995. “The Relationship between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (2): 263–82.
25.
GailusManfred. 1994. “Food Riots in Germany in the Late 1840s.” Past & Present145:157–93.
26.
GelmanAndrewJakulinAleksGrazia PittauMariaSuYu-Sung. 2008. “A Weakly Informative Default Prior Distribution for Logistic and Other Regression Models.” The Annals of Applied Statistics2 (4): 1360–83.
27.
GurrTed Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. New York: Routledge.
28.
GurrTed Robert. 1993. “Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict Since 1945.” International Political Science Review14 (2): 161–201.
29.
HendrixCullen S.HaggardStephan. 2015. “Global Food Prices, Regime Type, and Urban Unrest in the Developing World.” Journal of Peace Research52 (2): 143–57.
30.
HorowitzDonald L.2001. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
KaratnyckyAdrianAckermanPeter. 2005. How Freedom Is Won. Washington DC: Freedom House.
32.
KrausePeter. 2017. Rebel Power: Why National Movements Compete, Fight, and Win. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
Le BonGustave. 1897. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. London, UK: T. F. Unwin.
34.
LichbachMark Irving. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
36.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2003. “Dynamics of Contention.” Social Movement Studies2 (1): 99–102.
37.
MuthooAbhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
38.
OlzakSusan. 2005. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
PapeRobert. 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.
40.
PearlmanWendy. 2011. Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PestanoAndrew V.2017. Venezuela: 75 Percent of Population Lost 19 Pounds Amid Crisis. Washington, DC: United Press International.
42.
PinckneyJonathan. 2016. Making or Breaking Nonviolent Discipline in Civil Resistance Movements. Washington, DC: ICNC Press.
43.
PonsCorina. 2017. “Venezuela 2016 Inflation Hits 800 Percent, GDP Shrinks 19 Percent: Document.” Reuters, January 20, 2017.
44.
RaineyCarlisle. 2016. “Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models.” Political Analysis24 (3): 339–55.
45.
ReganPatrick M.NortonDaniel. 2005. “Greed, Grievance, and Mobilization in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (3): 319–36.
46.
RitterEmily HenckenConradCourtenay R.. 2016. “Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression.” American Political Science Review110 (1): 85–99.
47.
RudéGeorge F. E.1981. The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848. London, UK: Lawrence & Wishart.
48.
SalehyanIdeanHendrixCullen S.HamnerJesseCaseChristinaLinebargerChristopherStullEmilyWilliamsJennifer. 2012. “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.” International Interactions38 (4): 503–11.
49.
SambanisNicholas. 2001. “Do Ethnic and Non-ethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 259–82.
50.
SambanisNicholasZinnAnnalisa. 2005. “From Protest to Violence: An Analysis of Conflict Escalation with an Application to Self-determination Movements.” American Political Science Association Annual Conference1–45.
51.
SiegelDavid A.2009. “Social Networks and Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 122–38.
52.
SmithTodd Graham. 2014. “Feeding Unrest: Disentangling the Causal Relationship between Food Price Shocks and Sociopolitical Conflict in Urban Africa.” Journal of Peace Research51 (6): 679–95.
53.
StephanMaria J.ChenowethErica. 2008. “Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.” International Security33 (1): 7–44.
54.
TarrowSidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Social Conflict, Political Protest and Democracy in Italy, 1965–1975. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
TarrowSidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56.
TarrowSidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
TillyLouise A.1971. “The Food Riot as a Form of Political Conflict in France.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2 (1): 23–57.
58.
VogtManuelBormannNils-ChristianRüeggerSerainaCedermanLars-ErikHunzikerPhilippGirardinLuc. 2015. “Integrating Data on Ethnicity, Geography, and Conflict: The Ethnic Power Relations Data Set Family.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (7): 1327–42.
59.
WagnerR. Harrison. 2000. “Bargaining and War.” American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 469–84.
60.
WilkinsonSteven I.2009. “Riots.” Annual Review of Political Science12:329–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
