Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Existing research reveals many of the ways pro-government militia (PGM) shape civil violence but overlooks how the ethno-political ties between the state and a PGM might influence these effects. We argue that co-ethnic militia (i.e., groups composed of the ruling elite’s ethnic kin) are relatively loyal irregular forces that multiply state military capacity. The greater loyalty of co-ethnic groups mitigates principal–agent problems but further polarizes ethnic communities, and as a result, co-ethnic PGMs are likely to be associated with longer and more intense civil conflict. We test this argument on a global sample of cases from 1989 to 2007 using new data capturing the ethnic ties of all PGMs. The results support our claims that co-ethnic militia are associated with more intense and longer civil conflict.

Keywords

ethnicity pro-government militia counterinsurgency civil war conflict intensity conflict duration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alden

Thakur

Arnold

M. W.

. 2011. Militias and the Challenges of Post-conflict Peace: Silencing the Guns. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Aliyev

2016. “Strong Militias, Weak States and Armed Violence: Towards a Theory of ‘State-parallel’ Paramilitaries.” Security Dialogue 47 (6): 498–516.

Aliyev

. 2017. “Pro-regime Militias and Civil War Duration.” Terrorism and Political Violence 1–21. Accessed November 29. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1393415.

Aliyev

. 2018. “‘No Peace, No War’ Proponents? How Pro-regime Militias Affect Civil War Termination and Outcomes.” Cooperation and Conflict 54 (1): 64–82.

Aliyev

Souleimanov

E. A.

. 2019. “Ethnicity and Conflict. Accounting for the Effect of Co-ethnic and Non-ethnic Militias on Battlefield Lethality.” Third World Quarterly 40 (3): 471–87.

Barter

S. J.

2013. “State Proxy or Security Dilemma? Understanding Anti-rebel Militias in Civil War.” Asian Security 9 (2): 75–92.

Böhmelt

Clayton

. 2018. “Auxiliary Force Structure: Paramilitary Forces and Pro-government Militias.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (2): 197–237.

Buhaug

Gates

Lujala

. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4): 544–69.

Carey

S. C.

Colaresi

M. P.

Mitchell

N. J.

. 2015. “Governments, Informal Links to Militias, and Accountability.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (5): 850–76.

10.

Carey

S. C.

Colaresi

M. P.

Mitchell

N. J.

. 2016. “Risk Mitigation, Regime Security, and Militias: Beyond Coup-proofing.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 59–72.

11.

Carey

S. C.

Mitchell

N. J.

. 2017. “Pro-government Militias.” Annual Review of Political Science 20:127–47.

12.

Carey

S. C.

Mitchell

N. J.

Lowe

. 2013. “States, the Security Sector, and the Monopoly of Violence: A New Database on Pro-government Militias.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (2): 249–58.

13.

Carey

S. C.

Mitchell

N. J.

Scharpf

. 2018. “The Composition of the Security Sector and the Duration of Counterinsurgency Campaigns.” Paper prepared for ENCoRe Meeting in Geneva, January 21–22, 2016. Accessed August 10, 2019. https://unige.ch/sciences-societe/speri/files/7114/5297/4725/CareyMitchellScharpfENCoRe2016_final.pdf.

14.

Carter Center. 2013, August 20. “Syrian Countrywide Conflict Report No.1.” Syrian Conflict Mapping Program. https://www.cartercenter.org/.

15.

Cederman

L.-E.

Gleditsch

K. S.

Buhaug

. 2013. Inequality, Grievances and Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Cederman

L.-E.

Hug

Schädel

Wucherpfennig

. 2015. “Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 354–70.

17.

Clayton

Thomson

. 2016. “Civilianizing Civil Conflict: Civilian Defense Militias and the Logic of Violence in Intrastate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 499–510.

18.

Cunningham

D. E.

2006. “Veto Players and Civil War Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 875–92.

19.

Cunningham

D. E.

Gleditsch

K. S.

Salehyan

. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4): 570–97.

20.

Denny

E. K.

Walter

B. F.

. 2014. “Ethnicity and Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (2): 199–212.

21.

De Rouen

Jr Bercovitch

Pospieszna

. 2011. “Introducing the new Civil Wars Mediation (CWM) Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 48 (5): 663–72.

22.

Eck

2009. “From Armed Conflict to War: Ethnic Mobilization and Conflict Intensification.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (2): 369–88.

23.

Fjelde

Hultman

. 2014. “Weakening the Enemy: A Disaggregated Study of Violence against Civilians in Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (7): 1230–57.

24.

Gates

Strand

. 2004. “Modeling the Duration of Civil Wars: Measurement and Estimation Issues.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 2004 Meeting of the Standing Group on International Relations, the Hague, September 9-11.

25.

Gleditsch

K. S.

2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5): 712–25.

26.

Gleditsch

N. P.

Wallensteen

Eriksson

Sollenberg

Strand

. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 616–37.

27.

Gurcan

2015. “Arming Civilians as a Counterterror Strategy: The Case of the Village Guard System in Turkey.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 8 (1): 1–22.

28.

Harkness

K. A.

2016. “The Ethnic Army and the State: Explaining Coup Traps and the Difficulties of Democratization in Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (4): 587–616.

29.

Hegre

Hultman

Nygård

H. M.

. 2018. “Evaluating the Conflict-reducing Effect of UN Peacekeeping Operations.” The Journal of Politics 81 (1): 215–31.

30.

Hendrix

Young

. 2014. “State Capacity and Terrorism: A Two-dimensional Approach.” Security Studies 23 (2): 329–63.

31.

Kosuke

King

Stuart

. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15:199–236.

32.

Idris

2005. Conflict and Politics of Identity in Sudan. London, UK: Springer.

33.

Jentzsch

2014. “Militias and the Dynamics of Civil War.” PhD Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

34.

Jentzsch

Kalyvas

S. N.

Schubiger

L. I.

. 2015. “Militias in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (5): 755–69.

35.

Johnson

D. H.

2003. The Root Causes of Sudan’s Civil Wars. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

36.

Kalyvas

S. N.

2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Kalyvas

S. N.

2008. “Ethnic Defection in Civil War.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (8): 1043–68.

38.

Kaufmann

1996. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars.” International Security 20 (4): 136–75.

39.

Kirschke

2000. “Informal Repression, Zero-sum Politics and Late Third Wave Transitions.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 38 (3): 383–405.

40.

Kirschner

S. A.

2010. “Knowing Your Enemy: Information and Commitment Problems in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (5): 745–70.

41.

Koren

2017. “Means to an End: Pro-government Militias as a Predictive Indicator of Strategic Mass Killing.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (5): 461–84.

42.

Kreutz

2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 243–50.

43.

Lyall

2010. “Are Co-ethnics More Effective Counterinsurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 1–20.

44.

Magid

Schon

. 2018. “Introducing the African Relational Pro-government Militia Dataset (RPGMD).” International Interactions 44 (4): 801–32.

45.

Marshall

G. M.

Jaggers

. 2006. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2006.” Accessed January 17, 2019. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.

46.

Martin

2002. “Sudan’s Perfect War.” Foreign Affairs 81 (2): 111–27.

47.

McLaughlin

2010. “Loyalty Strategies and Military Defection in Rebellion.” Comparative Politics 42 (3): 333–50.

48.

Mitchell

N. J.

Carey

S. C.

Butler

C. K.

. 2014. “The Impact of Pro-government Militias on Human Rights Violations.” International Interactions 40 (5): 812–36.

49.

Montalvo

J. G.

Reynal-Querol

. 2010. “Ethnic Polarization and the Duration of Civil Wars.” Economics of Governance 11 (2): 123–43.

50.

Pilster

Böhmelt

. 2011. “Coup-proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 28 (4): 331–50.

51.

Plümper

Troeger

V. E.

Manow

. 2005. “Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (2): 327–54.

52.

Posner

D. N.

2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics and Africa. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Raleigh

2016. “Pragmatic and Promiscuous: Explaining the Rise of Competitive Political Militias across Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (2): 283–310.

54.

Raleigh

Kishi

. 2018. “Hired Guns: Using Pro-government Militias for Political Competition.” Terrorism and Political Violence 1–22. Accessed January 8, 2018. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1388793.

55.

Roessler

2011. “The Enemy Within: Personal Rule, Coups, and Civil War in Africa.” World Politics 63 (2): 300–46.

56.

Roessler

2016. Ethnic Politics and State Power in Africa: The Logic of the Coup-civil War Trap. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Schneckener

2006. “Fragile Statehood, Armed Non-state Actors and Security Governance.” In Private Actors and Security Governance, edited by Bryden

Caparini

, 23–40. Berlin, Germany: LIT Verlag.

58.

Seymour

L. J. M.

2014. “Why Factions Switch Sides in Civil Wars: Rivalry, Patronage, and Realignment in Sudan.” International Security 39 (2): 92–131.

59.

Staniland

2012. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Insurgent Fratricide, Ethnic Defection, and the Rise of Pro-state Paramilitaries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (1): 16–40.

60.

Stanton

J. A.

2015. “Regulating Militias: Governments, Militias, and Civilian Targeting in Civil War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (5): 899–923.

61.

Steinert

C. V.

Steinert

J. I.

Carey

S. C.

. 2018. “Spoilers of Peace: Pro-government Militias as Risk Factors for Conflict Recurrence.” Journal of Peace Research 56 (2): 249–63.

62.

Souleimanov

E. A.

Aliyev

Ratelle

J. F.

. 2018. “Defected and Loyal? A Case Study of Counter-defection Mechanisms inside Chechen Paramilitaries.” Terrorism and Political Violence 30 (4): 616–36.

63.

Warren

T. C.

Troy

K. K.

. 2015. “Explaining Violent Intra-ethnic Conflict: Group Fragmentation in the Shadow of State Power.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (3): 484–509.

64.

Weinstein

J. M.

2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

65.

Wimmer

2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

66.

Wimmer

Cederman

L.-E.

Min

. 2009. “Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict: A Configurational Analysis of a New Global Data Set.” American Sociological Review 74 (2): 316–37.

67.

Wucherpfennig

Metternich

N. W.

Cederman

L.-E.

Gleditsch

K. S.

. 2012. “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War.” World Politics 64 (1): 79–115.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.49 MB

0.00 MB

0.94 MB

The Ties That Bind: Ethnicity,Pro-government Militia,and the Dynamics of Violence in Civil War

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material