Recent research into the public’s attitude toward the use of nuclear weapons repeats long-standing mistakes in how international relations theorists think about morality. Falsely equating consequentialism with state egoism and normative obligations with restrictions on the use of weapons of mass destruction implies that ethically motivated beliefs about foreign affairs must be other-regarding and that other-regarding behavior is not utilitarian in character. Drawing on empirical research into moral psychology, we argue that liberal, other-regarding morality is only one kind of ethical foundation. Alternative moral concerns such as retribution, deference to authority, and in-group loyalty also help to determine foreign policy beliefs. We find that all three are associated with support for the use of nuclear weapons in the American public. Our survey respondents act as moral utilitarians who weigh different ethical considerations in forming their judgments.
AharoniEyalFridlundAlan J.. 2012. “Punishment without Reason: Isolating Retribution in Lay Punishment of Criminal Offenders.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law18 (4): 599–625.
2.
AltemeyerRobert A.1998. “The Other ‘Authoritarian Personality.’” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology30: 47–91.
3.
ArianAsherShamirMichalVenturaRaphael. 1992. “Public Opinion and Political Change: Israel and the Intifada.” Comparative Politics24 (3): 317–34.
4.
BanduraAlbert. 1999. “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review3 (3): 193–209.
5.
BaumMatthew A.2004. “Going Private Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in US Foreign Policy Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (5): 603–31.
6.
BaumMatthew A.PotterPhilip. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BayramA. Burcu. 2015. “What Drives Modern Diogenes? Individual Values and Cosmopolitan Allegiance.” European Journal of International Relations21 (2): 451–79.
8.
BerinskyAdam J.2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BerinskyAdam J.HuberGregory A.LenzGabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis20 (3): 351–68.
10.
BerinskyAdam J.MargolisMichele F.SancesMichael W.. 2013. “Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys.” American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 739–53.
11.
BusbyJoshua. 2010. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CarlsmithKevin M.DarleyJohn M.. 2008. “Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology40: 193–236.
13.
CarlsmithKevin M.SoodAvani Mehta. 2009. “The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45 (1): 191–96.
14.
CarpenterCharli. 2014. Lost Causes: Agenda-vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
CarrE. H.1964. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. New York: Harper.
16.
CottonMichele. 2000. “Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as an Articulated Purpose of Criminal Punishment.” The American Criminal Law Review37 (4): 1313–62.
17.
DolanThomas M.2013. “Unthinkable and Tragic: The Psychology of Weapons Taboos in War.” International Organization67 (1): 37–63.
18.
DuckittJohn. 2001. “A Dual-process Cognitive-motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology33: 41–113.
19.
DuckittJohnBizumicBorisKruassStephen W.HeledEdna. 2010. “A Tripartite Approach to Right-wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism Model.” Political Psychology31 (5): 685–715.
20.
DuckittJohnWagnerClairePlessisIlouize DuBirumIngrid. 2002. “The Psychological Bases of Ideology and Prejudice: Testing a Dual Process Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83 (1): 75.
21.
DworkinRonald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
EllsworthPhoebe C.RossLee. 1983. “Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and Retentionists.” Crime and Delinquency29 (1): 116–69.
23.
EriksonKai. 1991. “Radiation’s Lingering Dread.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists47 (2): 34–39.
24.
FedericoChristopher M.WeberChristopher R.ErgunDamlaHuntCorrie. 2013. “Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition.” Political Psychology34 (4): 589–610.
25.
FeldmanStanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology24 (1): 41–74.
26.
FinnemoreMartha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
FinnemoreMartha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
FoyleDouglas C.1999. Counting the Public in: Presidents, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
FreyKarsten J. 2006. Nuclear Weapons as Symbols: The Role of Norms in Nuclear Policy Making. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=960762.
30.
GoldmannKjell. 2005. “Appropriateness and Consequences: The Logic of Neo-institutionalism.” Governance18 (1): 35–52.
31.
GollwitzerMarioSkitkaLinda J.WisneskiDanielSjöströmArneLibermanPeterNazirSyed JavedBushmanBrad J.. 2014. “Vicarious Revenge and the Death of Osama Bin Laden.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40 (5): 604–16.
32.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96 (5): 1029–46.
33.
GrahamJesseNosekBrian A.HaidtJonathanIyerRaviKolevaSpassenaDittoPeter H.. 2011. “Mapping the Moral Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101 (2): 366–85.
HintonAlexander Laban. 1998. “A Head for an Eye: Revenge in the Cambodian Genocide.” American Ethnologist25 (3): 352–77.
36.
HowardRhoda E.DonnellyJack. 1986. “Human Dignity, Human Rights and Political Regimes.” American Political Science Review80 (3): 801–17.
37.
KatzensteinPeter J., Ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
38.
KaufmannChaim D.PapeRobert A.. 1999. “Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain’s Sixty-year Campaign against the Atlantic Slave Trade.” International Organization53 (4): 631–68.
39.
KeckMargaretSikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press.
40.
KertzerJoshua D.PowersKathleen E.RathbunBrian C.IyerRavi. 2014. “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes.” The Journal of Politics76 (3): 825–40.
41.
KertzerJoshua D.RathbunBrian C.. 2015. “Fair Is Fair: Social Preferences and Reciprocity in International Politics.” World Politics67 (4): 613–55.
42.
KertzerJoshua D.ZeitzoffThomas. 2017. “A Bottom-up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy.” American Journal of Political Science61 (3): 543–58.
43.
KlotzAudie. 1995. “Norms Reconstituting Interests: The Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa.” International Organization49 (3): 451–78.
44.
KolevaSpassena P.GrahamJesseIyerRaviDittoPeter H.HaidtJonathan. 2012. “Tracing the Threads: How Five Moral Concerns (Especially Purity) Help Explain Culture War Attitudes.” Journal of Research in Personality46 (2): 184–94.
45.
KrebsRonald. 2015. Narrative and the Making of US National Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
KrebsRonaldJacksonPatrick Thaddeus. 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.” European Journal of International Relations13 (10): 35–66.
47.
KrepsSaraMaxeySarah. 2018. “Mechanisms of Morality: Sources of Support for Humanitarian Intervention.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (8): 1814–42.
48.
KuglerMatthewJostJohnNoorbaloochiSharareh. 2014. “Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory.” Social Justice Research27 (4): 413–31.
49.
LibermanPeter. 2006. “An Eye for an Eye: Public Support for War against Evildoers.” International Organization60 (3): 687–722.
50.
LibermanPeter. 2013. “Retributive Support for International Punishment and Torture.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 285–306.
51.
LibermanPeter. 2014. “War and Torture as ‘Just Deserts.’” Public Opinion Quarterly78 (1): 47–70.
52.
LumsdaineDavid Halloran. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
MarchJames G.OlsenJohan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
54.
MarchJames G.OlsenJohan P.. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization52 (4): 943–69.
55.
McKeownTimothy J.2000. “The Cuban Missile Crisis and Politics as Usual.” Journal of Politics62 (1): 70–87.
56.
MorganT. CliftonAndersonChristopher J.. 1999. “Domestic Support and Diversionary External Conflict in Great Britain, 1950–1992.” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 799–814.
57.
MorgenthauHans. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–38.
59.
PressDaryl G.SaganScott D.ValentinoBenjamin A.. 2013. “Atomic Aversion: Experimental Evidence on Taboos, Traditions, and the Non-use of Nuclear Weapons.” American Political Science Review107 (1): 1–19.
60.
PriceRichard. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
PriceRichard. 2008. “Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics.” International Organization62 (2): 192–220.
62.
RathbunBrian C.KertzerJoshua D.ReiflerJasonGorenPaulScottoThomas J.. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly60 (1): 124–37.
63.
SaganScott D.ValentinoBenjamin A.. 2017. “Revisiting Hiroshima in Iran: What Americans Really Think about Using Nuclear Weapons and Killing Noncombatants.” International Security42 (1): 41–79.
64.
SantanaAnne Harrington de.2009. “Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Power.” The Nonproliferation Review16 (3): 325–45.
65.
SchumannKarinaRossMichael. 2010. “The Benefits, Costs, and Paradox of Revenge.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass4 (12): 1193–205.
66.
SkitkaLinda J.MullenElizabeth. 2002. “The Dark Side of Moral Conviction.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy2 (1): 35–41.
67.
SlovicPaulFlynnJames H.LaymanMark. 1991. “Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste.” Science254 (5038): 1603–07.
68.
SobelRichard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
SteinRachel M.2015. “War and Revenge: Explaining Conflict Initiation by Democracies.” American Political Science Review109 (3): 556–73.
70.
SteinRachel M.2019. Vengeful Citizens, Violent States: A Theory of War and Revenge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SuterRenata S.HertwigRalph. 2011. “Time and Moral Judgment.” Cognition119 (3): 454–58.
72.
TannenwaldNina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use.” International Organization53 (3): 433–68.
73.
TannenwaldNina. 2005. “Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo.” International Security29 (40): 5–49.
74.
TannenwaldNina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
TrippThomas M.BiesRobert J.. 2009. Getting Even: The Truth about Workplace Revenge—And How to Stop It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
Van LeeuwenFlorianParkJustin H.. 2009. “Perceptions of Social Dangers, Moral Foundations, and Political Orientation.” Personality and Individual Differences47 (3): 169–73.
77.
Van LeeuwenFlorianParkJustin H.KoenigBryan L.GrahamJesse. 2012. “Regional Variation in Pathogen Prevalence Predicts Endorsement of Group-focused Moral Concerns.” Evolution and Human Behavior33 (5): 429–37.
78.
WashburnAnthony N.SkitkaLinda J.. 2015. “Motivated and Displaced Revenge: Remembering 9/11 Suppresses Opposition to Military Intervention in Syria (for Some).” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy15 (1): 89–104.
79.
ZaalMaarten P.Van LaarC.StåhlT.EllemersN.DerksB.. 2011. “By Any Means Necessary: The Effects of Regulatory Focus and Moral Conviction on Hostile and Benevolent Forms of Collective Action.” British Journal of Social Psychology50 (4): 670–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
