This article examines the distribution and correlates of mass attitudes toward the privatization of US military operations. Relying on insights from principal–agent theory, we form predictions about what beliefs are associated with a willingness to grant authority over military operations to private military companies (PMCs). The model predicts that citizens’ beliefs about actor motives, accountability, and costs are associated with attitudes toward PMCs. Using a nationally representative survey, we find that beliefs about the profit-oriented motives of private firms and perceptions of their lack of accountability reduce support for the use of PMCs, particularly in combat operations. By contrast, belief in private firms’ superior fiscal efficiency increases support for utilizing PMCs in both combat and noncombat operations. The results illustrate the usefulness of principle-agent theory for understanding mass attitudes and help to improve the field’s understanding of the contours of public attitudes toward US defense policy.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AlvarezR. MichaelBrehmJohn. 1998. “Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation about the Internal Revenue Service.” American Journal of Political Science42 (2): 418–52.
3.
AvantDeborah. 2000. “From Mercenaries to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War.” International Organization54 (1): 41–72.
4.
AvantDeborah. 2005. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing SecurityCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AvantDeborah. 2009, Summer. “Private Security Contracting Undermines Democratic Control of Foreign Policy.” In The Mercenary Debate: Three Views, The American Interest, vol. 4, edited by FriesendorCorneliusFriedrichsJorg. Accessed May 10, 2017. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2009/05/01/the-mercenary-debate/.
6.
AvantDeborahSigelmanLee. 2010. “Private Security and Democracy: Lessons from the US and Iraq.” Security Studies19:230–65.
7.
BaumMatthew A.PotterPhilip B. K.. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BelGermaWarnerMildred. 2008. “Does Privatization of Solid Waste and Water Services Reduce Costs? A Review of Empirical Studies.” Resources, Conservation, and Recycling52 (12): 1137–348.
9.
BerinskyAdam J.2009. In a Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BrehmJohn O.GatesScott. 1999. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
BrunstetterDaniel R.HoleindreJean-Vincent. 2018. The Ethics of War and Peace Revisited. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
ButlerChristopherGluchTaliMitchellNeil. 2007. “Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-national Analysis of a Principal-agent Argument.” Journal of Peace Research44 (6): 669–87.
14.
CalaguasMark. 2006. “Military Privatization: Efficiency or Anarchy?Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law6 (1): 58–252.
15.
ChestermanSimonLehnardtChia. 2007. From Mercenaries to Markets: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
CockayneJames. 2007. “Make or Buy? Principal-agent Theory and the Regulation of Private Military Companies.” In From Mercenaries to Market: the Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, edited byChestermanSimonLehnardtChia, 196–216. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–92.
18.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.. 1998. “War, Casualties, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (3): 278–300.
19.
GatesScott. 2002. “Recruitment and Allegiance: The Microfoundations of Rebellion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 111–30.
20.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter D.ReiflerJason. 2009. Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HainmuellerJens. 2012. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis20:25–46.
22.
HolstiOle R.1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus.” International Studies Quarterly36 (4): 439–66.
23.
HurwitzJonPeffleyMark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review81 (4): 1099–120.
24.
HutchingsVincent L.2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
KertzerJoshua D.ZeitzoffThomas. 2017. “A Bottom-up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy.” American Journal of Political Science61 (3): 543–58.
27.
KidwellDeborah. 2005. Public War, Private Fight? The United States and Private Military Companies. Global War on Terrorism Occasional Paper 12. Ft. Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press.
28.
KingdonJohn W.1973. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.
29.
KrahmannElke. 2010. States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LandlerMarkSchmittEricGordonMichael R.. 2017. “Businessmen Get a Say on Afghan War Strategy.” New York Times, July 11, 2017, p. A1.
31.
LundahlBrad W.KunzChelseaBrownellCyndiHarrisNormaVleetRuss Van. 2009. “Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators.” Research on Social Work Practice19 (4): 383–94.
32.
MillerGary. 2005. “The Political Evolution of Principal-agent Models.” Annual Review of Political Science8:203–25.
33.
MilnerHelen V.TingleyDustin. 2015. Sailing the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
MitchellNeil. 2004. Agents of Atrocity: Leaders, Followers, and the Violation of Human Rights in Civil War. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
35.
O’BrienKevin A.2007. “What Future, Privatized Military and Security Activities? The Need for Pragmatic Engagement.” The RUSI Journal152: 254–61.
36.
PitkinHanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
PercySarah. 2007. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
SalehyanIdeanSirokyDavidWoodReed M.. 2014. “External Rebel Sponsorship and Civilian Abuse: A Principal-agent Analysis of Wartime Atrocities.” International Organization68 (3): 633–61.
40.
SalzmanZoe. 2008. “Private Military Contractors and the Taint of a Mercenary Reputation.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics3 (Spring): 853–92.
41.
SingerPeter W.2008. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
SchwartzMoshe. 2011. The Department of Defense’s Use of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq. Congressional Research Service Report. Washington, DC, 1–22.
43.
SchwartzShalom H.2007. “Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences across Nations.” In Measuring Attitudes Cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, edited by JowellRogerRobertsCarolineFitzgeraldRoryEvaGillian, 169–204. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
SmithMark. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
45.
SobelRichard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on US Foreign Policy since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
StrangerAllisonWilliamsMark Eric. 2006. “Private Military Corporations: Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Security.” Yale Journal of International Affairs2 (Fall/Winter): 4–19.
47.
TkachBenjamin. 2017. “Private Military and Security Companies, Contract Structure, Market Competition, and Violence in Iraq.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. doi: 10.1177/0738894217702516. Accessed October 13, 2017. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0738894217702516.
48.
WeinsteinJeremy. 2006. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WhyteDave. 2006. “The Crimes of Neo-liberal Rule in Occupied Iraq.” The British Journal of Criminology47 (2): 177–95.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
