Why do some states pursue transitional justice (TJ) in the immediate aftermath of armed conflict while others do not? What drives a state to select a particular type of justice mechanism over another? Building on the political explanations of TJ, we argue that postconflict justice (PCJ) decisions are driven by the interests and power of political elites shaped by recently ended conflicts. Our empirical analysis shows that conflict outcomes and their subsequent impact on the balance of power between the government and rebel groups are the most important determinants of PCJ decisions. Domestic trials are most likely to emerge out of a decisive, one-sided victory while truth commissions and reparations are most likely to occur after a negotiated settlement. We also find that conflict severity interacts with conflict outcomes to affect PCJ decisions.
AppelBenjamin J.LoyleCyanne E.. 2012. “The Economic Benefits of Justice Post-conflict Justice and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 685–99.
BatesRobertHampsonFen OslerLeviMargaretRossMarc Howard. 2007. Consolidating Peace and Mitigating Conflict in the Aftermath of Violence. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association Task Force on Political Violence and Terrorism.
4.
BinningsbøHelga MalminLoyleCyanne E.GatesScottElsterJon. 2012. “Armed Conflict and Post-conflict Justice, 1946–2006 A Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 731–40.
5.
BoixCarlesMillerMichaelRosatoSebastian. 2013. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies46 (12): 1523–54.
6.
BrahmEric. 2007. “Uncovering the Truth: Examining Truth Commission Success and Impact.” International Studies Perspectives8 (1): 16–35.
7.
ChapmanAudrey R.BallPatrick. 2001. “The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala.” Human Rights Quarterly23 (1): 1–43.
8.
ElsterJon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
FarissChristopher J.2014. “Respect for Human Rights has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review108 (02): 297–318.
10.
FortnaVirginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
GibsonJames L.2006. “The Contributions of Truth to Reconciliation Lessons from South Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (3): 409–32.
12.
GrodskyBrian K.2010. The Costs of Justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13.
HaynerPriscilla B.1994. “Fifteen Truth Commissions—1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study.” Human Rights Quarterly16:597.
14.
HaynerPriscilla B.2010. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. London, UK: Routledge.
15.
HeniszWitold J.2002. “The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment.” Industrial and Corporate Change11 (2): 355–89.
16.
HultmanLisa. 2007. “Battle Losses and Rebel Violence: Raising the Costs for Fighting.” Terrorism and Political Violence19 (2): 205–22.
17.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
18.
HuyseLuc. 1995. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past.” Law & Social Inquiry20 (1): 51–78.
19.
JefferyRenée. 2012. “Amnesty and Accountability: The Price of Peace in Aceh, Indonesia.” International Journal of Transitional Justice6 (1): 60–82.
20.
JefferyRenée. 2014. Amnesties, Accountability, and Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
KimHun Joon. 2012. “Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions after Democratic Transition.” Journal of Peace Research49 (2): 305–20.
22.
KimHunjoonSikkinkKathryn. 2010. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries1.” International Studies Quarterly54 (4): 939–63.
23.
KreutzJoakim. 2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research47 (2): 243–50.
24.
LacinaBethanyGleditschNils Petter. 2005. “Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths.” European Journal of Population[Revue européenne de Démographie]21 (2-3): 145–66.
25.
LambourneWendy. 2009. “Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence.” International Journal of Transitional Justice3 (1): 28–48.
26.
LeclercqSidney. 2017. “Injustice through Transitional Justice? Subversion Strategies in Burundi’s Peace Process and Postconflict Developments.” International Journal of Transitional Justice11 (3): 525–44.
27.
LehoucqFabrice. 2012. The Politics of Modern Central America: Civil War, Democratization, and Underdevelopment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LickliderRoy. 1995. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945-1993.” The American Political Science Review89 (3): 681–90.
29.
LieTove GreteBinningsbøHelga MalminGatesScott. 2007. “Post-conflict Justice and Sustainable Peace.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4191. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
LoyleCyanne E.DavenportChristian. 2016. “Transitional Injustice: Subverting Justice in Transition and Postconflict Societies.” Journal of Human Rights15 (1): 126–49.
31.
MallinderLouise. 2007. “Can Amnesties and International Justice be Reconciled?” The International Journal of Transitional Justice1 (2): 208–30.
32.
MallinderLouise. 2008. Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
33.
MasonDavid T.GursesMehmetBrandtPatrick T.QuinnJason Michael. 2011. “When Civil Wars Recur: Conditions for Durable Peace after Civil Wars.” International Studies Perspectives12 (2): 171–89.
34.
MeernikJames D.NicholsAngelaKingKimi L.. 2010. “The Impact of International Tribunals and Domestic Trials on Peace and Human Rights after Civil War.” International Studies Perspectives11 (4): 309–34.
35.
MendeloffDavid. 2004. “Truth-seeking, Truth-telling, and Postconflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm?” International Studies Review6 (3): 355–80.
36.
MinowMartha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
37.
NaderyAhmad Nader. 2007. “Peace or Justice? Transitional Justice in Afghanistan.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice1 (1): 173–79.
38.
NalepaMonika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-communist Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
NinoCarlos S.1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
NoblesMelissa. 2010. “The Prosecution of Human Rights Violations.” Annual Review of Political Science13 (1): 165–82.
41.
O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
OlsenTricia D.PayneLeigh A.ReiterAndrew G.. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.
43.
PajiboEzekiel. 2007. “Civil Society and Transitional Justice in Liberia: A Practitioner’s Reflection from the Field.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice1 (2): 287–96.
44.
PeskinVictor. 2008. International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45.
PhamPhuongVinckPatrickStoverEricMossAndrewWierdaMariekeBaileyRichard. 2007. When the War Ends. A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes about Peace, Justice and Social Reconstruction in Northern Uganda. New York and Berkeley: International Center for Transitional Justice and Human Rights Center.
46.
Pion-BerlinDavid. 1994. “To Prosecute or to Pardon? Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone.” Human Rights Quarterly16 (1): 105–30.
47.
PowersKathy L.ProctorKim. 2017. “Victim’s Justice in the Aftermath of Political Violence: Why Do Countries Award Reparations?” Foreign Policy Analysis13 (4): 787–810.
48.
RoperSteven D.BarriaLilian A.. 2009. “Why do States Commission the Truth? Political Considerations in the Establishment of African Truth and Reconciliation Commissions.” Human Rights Review10 (3): 373–91.
49.
RotheDawn L.MaggardScott. 2012. “Factors that Impede or Facilitate Post-conflict Justice Mechanisms?” International Criminal Law Review12 (2): 193–217.
50.
RustadSiri AasBinningsbøHelga Malmin. 2012. “A Price Worth Fighting For? Natural Resources and Conflict Recurrence.” Journal of Peace Research49 (4): 531–46.
51.
SamiiCyrus. 2013. “Who Wants to Forgive and Forget? Transitional Justice Preferences in Postwar Burundi.” Journal of Peace Research50 (2): 219–33.
52.
ShawRosalind. 2007. “Memory Frictions: Localizing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone.” The International Journal of Transitional Justice1 (2): 183–207.
53.
SieffMichelleWrightLeslie Vinjamuri. 1999. “Reconciling Order and Justice? New Institutional Solutions in Post-conflict States.” Journal of International Affairs52 (2): 757.
54.
SikkinkKathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (The Norton Series in World Politics). New York: W. W. Norton.
55.
SikkinkKathrynKimHun Joon. 2013. “The Justice Cascade: The Origins and Effectiveness of Prosecutions of Human Rights Violations.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science9 (1): 269–85.
56.
SikkinkKathrynWallingCarrie Booth. 2007. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research44 (4): 427–45.
57.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie. 2004. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security28 (3): 5–44.
58.
SriramChandra Lekha. 2007. “Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice.” Global Society21 (4): 579–91.
59.
SuboticJelena. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60.
TeitelRuti G.2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
ToftMonica Duffy. 2010. Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
VinjamuriLeslieSnyderJack. 2015. “Law and Politics in Transitional Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science18 (1): 303–27.
63.
WalterBarbara F.2009. “Bargaining Failures and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science12 (1): 243–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
