Recent years have seen an increased emphasis on both protection of civilians and the problem of sexual violence. We explore the impact of United Nations (UN) peacekeeping on the occurrence of wartime sexual violence. Acknowledging the difficulty in reducing sexual violence, we propose two conditions under which peacekeepers are more likely to be successful: when the mission has a protection mandate and when the conflict actors exercise a high level of control over their forces. We find that the ability of peacekeepers to reduce sexual violence in general is weak. Only police within protection missions reduces the risk of sexual violence by rebels. However, when the actors exercise control, the number of peacekeepers is associated with a lower risk of sexual violence by both governments and rebels. We conclude that dealing with sexual violence by weak and fragmented actors is a challenging task beyond the current capacity of UN peacekeeping.
BeardsleyKyleKarimSabrina. 2016. “Explaining Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Peacekeeping Missions: The Role of Female Peacekeepers and Gender Equality in Contributing Countries.” Journal of Peace Research53 (1): 100–15.
2.
BeberBerndtGilliganMichaelGuardadoJennyKarimSabrina. 2017. “Peacekeeping, Compliance with International Norms, and Transactional Sex in Monrovia, Liberia.” International Organization71 (1): 1–30.
3.
BoveVincenzoRuggeriAndrea. 2015. “Kinds of Blue. Diversity in U.N. Peacekeeping Missions and Civilian Protection.” British Journal of Political Science46 (3): 681–700.
4.
ButlerC. K.GluchT.MitchellN. J.. 2007. “Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal Agent Argument.” Journal of Peace Research44 (6): 669–87.
5.
ChristiaFotini. 2012. Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChuS. TiffanyBraithwaiteJessica Maves. 2018. “The Effect of Sexual Violence on Negotiated Outcomes in Civil Conflicts.” Conflict Management and Peace Science35(3): 233–47.
7.
CohenDara Kay. 2013. “Explaining Rape during Civil War: Cross-national Evidence (1980–2009).” American Political Science Review107 (3): 461–77.
CohenDara KayNordåsRagnhild. 2014. “Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Introducing the SVAC Dataset, 1989–2009.” Journal of Peace Research51 (3): 418–28.
10.
CohenDara KayNordåsRagnhild. 2015. “Do States Delegate Shameful Violence to Militias? Patterns of Sexual Violence in Recent Armed Conflicts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (5): 877–98.
11.
CoppedgeMichaelGerringJohnLindbergStaffan I.SkaaningSvend-ErikTeorellJanAltmanDavidBernhardMichael. 2016. “V-Dem Country-year Dataset v6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Accessed November 15, 2016. https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-6/.
12.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdean. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 570–97.
13.
DaviesSaraTrueJacqui. 2015. “Reframing Conflict-related Sexual and Gender-based Violence: Bringing Gender Analysis Back In.” Security Dialogue46 (6): 495–512.
14.
DeMerittJacqueline. 2015. “Delegating Death: Military Intervention and Government Killing.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (3): 428–54.
15.
EckKristineHultmanLisa. 2007 “One-Sided Violence against Civilians in War: Insights from New Fatality Data.” Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 233–46.
16.
Eriksson BaazMariaSternMaria. 2009. “Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC).” International Studies Quarterly53 (2): 495–18.
17.
Eriksson BaazMariaSternMaria. 2013. Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War? Perceptions, Prescriptions, Problems in the Congo and Beyond. London, UK: Zed Book.
18.
FjeldeHanneHultmanLisaBromleySara Lindberg. 2016. “Offsetting Losses: Bargaining Power and Rebel Attacks on Peacekeepers.” International Studies Quarterly60 (4): 611–23.
19.
FortnaVirginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
GilliganMichaelStedmanStephen John. 2003. “Where Do the Peacekeepers Go?” International Studies Review5 (4): 37–54.
21.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5):615–37.
22.
Gutiérrez-SanínFransiscoWoodElisabeth Jean. 2017. “What Should We Mean by ‘Pattern of Political Violence’? Repertoire, Targeting, Frequency, and Technique.” Perspectives on Politics15 (1): 20–41.
23.
HarffBarbara. 2003. “No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing the Risk of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 57–73.
24.
Hoover GreenAmelia. 2011. “Repertoires of Violence: The Role of Armed Group Institutions and Ideologies.” Doctoral dissertation,Yale University,New Haven, CT.
25.
Hoover GreenAmelia. 2016. “The Commander’s Dilemma: Creating and Controlling Armed Group Violence.” Journal of Peace Research53 (5): 619–32.
26.
HowardLise Morjé. 2008. UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HultmanLisa. 2013. “UN Peace Operations and Protection of Civilians: Cheap Talk or Norm Implementation?” Journal of Peace Research50 (1): 59–73.
28.
HultmanLisaJohanssonKarin. 2017. “Responding to Sexual Violence: UN Peacekeeping and the Protection Agenda.” Global Responsibility to Protect9 (2): 129–46.
29.
HultmanLisaKathmanJacobShannonMegan. 2013. “United Nations Peacekeeping and Civilian Protection in Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science57 (4): 875–91.
JohanssonKarinSarwariMehwish. 2017. “Sexual Violence and Biased Military Interventions in Civil Conflict.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. doi:10.1177/0738894216689814.
32.
KathmanJacob D.WoodReed M.. 2016. “Stopping the Killing during the ‘Peace’: Peacekeeping and the Severity of Postconflict Civilian Victimization.” Foreign Policy Analysis12 (2): 149–69.
KirbyPaulShepherdLaura J. 2016. “The Futures Past of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.” International Affairs92 (2): 373–92.
35.
LeibyMichele. 2009. “Wartime Sexual Violence in Guatemala and Peru.” International Studies Quarterly53 (2): 445–68.
36.
MarksZoe. 2016. “Group-level Explanations of Wartime Sexual Violence: Toward an Analytical Framework.” Unpublished manuscript prepared for International Studies Association Working Group on Conflict Trends, Atlanta, GA.
37.
MelanderErik. 2009. “Selected To Go Where Murderers Lurk? The Preventive Effect of Peacekeeping on Mass Killings of Civilians.” Conflict Management and Peace Science26 (4): 389–406.
38.
Muvumba SellströmAngela. 2015. “Stronger than Justice: Armed Group Impunity for Sexual Violence.” Report 104, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
39.
NordåsRagnhild. 2011. “Sexual Violence in African Conflicts.” Policy Brief 01, Center for the Study of Civil War/Peace Research Institute, Oslo, Norway.
40.
NordåsRagnhildRustadSiri Aas. 2013. “Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by Peacekeepers: Understanding Variation.” International Interactions39 (4): 511–34.
41.
SarwariMehwish. 2016. “The Effects of United Nations Peacekeeping on Wartime Sexual Violence.” Paper presented at the ISA Annual Meeting, March 16–19, 2016, Atlanta, GA.
42.
SeifertRuth. 1996. “The Second Front: The Logic of Sexual Violence in Wars.” Women’s Studies International Forum19 (1-2): 35–43.
43.
SharlachLisa. 2000. “Rape as Genocide: Bangladesh, the Former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda.” New Political Science21 (1): 89–102.
44.
SkjelsbaekInger. 2001. “Sexual Violence in Times of War: A New Challenge for Peace Operations?” International Peacekeeping8 (2): 69–84.
45.
StantonJessica. 2013. “Terrorism in the Context of Civil War.” Journal of Politics75 (4): 1009–22.
46.
TryggestadT. L.2015. “FN som normspreder: Kvinner, fred og sikkerhet.” Internasjonal Politikk2015 (2): 275–84.
47.
UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset v.5. 2015. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Uppsala University. Accessed November 15, 2016. www.ucdp.uu.se.
UN Women (United Nations Women). 2012b. Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Connections between Presence and Influence, 2nd ed. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.peacewomen.org/node/92120
UN DPKO/DFS (United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support). 2014b. “Policy: United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions.” Ref. 2014.01. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/sites/police/documents/Policy.pdf.
56.
UNSC (United Nations Security Council). 2012. “Security Council Presidential Statement Condemns Sexual Violence in Conflict, Post-conflict Situations, Urges Complete, Immediate Cessation of Such Acts | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases.” SC/10555. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.un.org/press/en/2012/sc10555.doc.htm.
57.
ValentinoBenjaminHuthPaulBalch-LindsayDylan. 2004. “Draining the Sea: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare.” International Organization58 (2): 375–407.
WeinsteinJeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WoodElisabeth Jean. 2009. “Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Sexual Violence Rare?” Politics and Society37 (101): 131–61.
61.
WoodReed. 2014. “Opportunities to Kill or Incentives for Restraint? Rebel Capabilities, the Origins of Support, and Civilian Victimization in Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (5): 461–80.
62.
WoodReedKathmanJacobGentStephen. 2012. “Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 647–60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
