We introduce the new, substantially updated, and revised version of the Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) dataset. We discuss the underlying logic of constructing dyadic MIDs and demonstrate that these operations generate significant differences between the actual occurrence and properties of MID dyads and those extracted from machine-generated programs such as EUGene, or from the MID participant dataset. We provide some descriptive measures of dyadic MIDs over the period of 1816 to 2010 and compare some of the key dyadic results on the correlates of MIDs using different datasets. We discuss the theoretical and empirical implications of our results.
BarbieriKatherineKeshkOmar M. G.PollinsBrian. 2009. “Trading Data: Evaluating Our Assumptions and Coding Rules.” Conflict Management and Peace Science26:471–91.
2.
BennettD. ScottStamAlanIII. 2000. “Eugene: A Conceptual Manual.” International Interactions26:179–204.
3.
Bueno de MesquitaBruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
ClodfelterMichael. 2008. Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1494–2007. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland.
5.
Correlates of War Project 2008. 2008. National Material Capabilities V4.0. Correlates of War Project 2008. Accessed June 14, 2018. http://www.correlatesofwar.org/.
6.
CranmerSkyler J.DesmaraisBruce A.. 2011. “Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models.” Political Analysis19:66–86.
7.
CranmerSkyler J.DesmaraisBruce A.. 2016. “A Critique of Dyadic Design.” International Studies Quarterly60 (2): 355–62.
8.
GhosnFatenPalmerGlennBremerStuart. 2004. “The Mid3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 133–54.
9.
GiblerDouglas M.2008. International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
GiblerDouglas M.MillerSteven V.LittleErin K.. 2016. “An Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Disputes Dataset, 1816–2001.” International Studies Quarterly60 (4): 719–30.
11.
GleditschKristian S.WardMichael D.. 2001. “Measuring Space: A Minimum Distance Database.” Journal of Peace Research38 (4): 749–68.
MaozZeev. 1983. “Resolve, Capabilities, and the Outcomes of Interstate Disputes, 1816–1976.” Journal of Conflict Resolution27:195–229.
17.
MaozZeev. 1984. “Peace by Empire? Conflict Outcomes and International Stability, 1816–1976.” Journal of Peace Research21 (3): 227–41.
18.
MaozZeev. 1990. Paradoxes of War: On the Art of National Self-entrapment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
19.
MaozZeev. 1998. “Realist and Cultural Critiques of the Democratic Peace: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment.” International Interactions24:3–89.
20.
MaozZeev. 2004. “Pacifism and Fightaholism in International Politics: A Structural History of National and Dyadic Conflict, 1816–1992.” International Studies Review6:107–33.
MaozZeev. 2006. Defending the Holy Land: A Critical Analysis of Israel’s Security and Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
MaozZeev. 2009. “Primed to Fight: The Can/Must Syndrome and the Conflict Proneness of Nations.” Conflict Management and Peace Science26:1–26.
24.
MaozZeev. 2010. Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of International Networks, 1816–2001. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
MaozZeevRussettBruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review87:624–38.
26.
MarshallMonty G.KeithJaggersTedRobert Gurr. 2014. Polity IV Aannual Time-Series, 1800-2013. Center for International Development and Conflict Management at the University of Maryland College Park. Accessed June 14, 2018. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
27.
PalmerGlennD’OrazioVitoKenwickMichaelLaneMatthew. 2015. “The MID4 Dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, Coding Rules and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science32:222–42.
28.
PartellPeter J.PalmerGlenn. 1999. “Audience Costs and Interstate Crises: An Empirical Assessment of Fearon’s Model of Dispute Outcomes.” International Studies Quarterly43:389–405.
29.
PevehouseJonNordstromTimothyWrankeKevin. 2004. “The Correlates of War 2: International Governmental Organizations Data, Version 2.” Conflict Management and Peace Science21:101–19.
30.
QuackenbushStephen L.VenteicherJerome F.. 2008. “Settlements, Outcomes, and the Recurrence of Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research45:723–42.
31.
ReiterDanStamAllan C.HorowitzMichael C.. 2014. “A Revised Look at Interstate Wars, 1816–2007.” Journal of Conflict Resolution60 (5): 956–76.
32.
RussettBruceOnealJohn. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization. New York: W. W. Norton.
33.
SarkeesMeredithWaymanFrank W.. 2010. Resort to War: Civil and International Wars, 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
34.
SingerJ. David. 1990. “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Data Set on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985.” In The Correlates of War, edited by SingerJ. D.DiehlP. F.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 53–72.
35.
SingerDavid J.SmallMelvin. 1972. The Wages of War, 1815–1965. New York: John Wiley.
36.
SmallMelvinSingerDavid J.. 1982. Resort to Arms: Civil and International War. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
SullivanPatricia L.2007. “War Aims and War Outcomes Why Powerful States Lose Limited Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution51:496–524.
38.
SullivanPatricia L.2012. Who Wins? Predicting Strategic Success and Failure in Armed Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
TuchmanBarbara. 1962. The Guns of August. New York: Random House.
40.
WeinbergGerhard L.2005. A World at War, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
