Which countries are likely to be ignored for their human rights abuses? This article focuses on one particular way that cases of human rights abuse might be overlooked by human rights organizations (HROs): the relative visibility of the state’s abusiveness vis-à-vis its geographic and social peers. HROs are more likely to target abusive states that are located in regions with more HRO resources and/or are surrounded by states that demonstrate higher respect for human rights, as these abuses will stand out much more clearly. Further, human rights treaties can be used by abusive states as a form of strategic “social camouflage,” with states trying to minimize the risk of HRO attention by ratifying human rights treaties to look more like their rights-respecting peers. Using a cross-national time-series research design, this article finds much support for the argument: abusive states that “join the chorus” avoid HRO attention.
BarryColin M.BellSamChad ClayK.FlynnMichael2015Amanda Murdie.. “Choose the Best House in the Bad Neighborhood: Location Strategies of Human Rights INGOs in the Non-western World.” International Studies Quarterly59(1): 86–98.
3.
BarryColin M.Chad ClayK.FlynnMichael E.. 2013. “Avoiding the Spotlight: Human Rights Shaming and Foreign Direct Investment.” International Studies Quarterly57 (3): 532–44.
4.
BellSam R.BhasinTavishiChad ClayK.MurdieAmanda. 2014. “Taking the Fight to Them: Neighborhood Human Rights Organizations and Domestic Protest.” British Journal of Political Science44 (4): 853–75.
5.
BellSam R.Chad ClayK.MurdieAmanda. 2012. “Neighborhood Watch: Spatial Effects of Human Rights INGOs.” Journal of Politics74 (2): 354–68.
6.
BobClifford. 2002. “Merchants of Morality.” Foreign Policy129:36–45.
7.
BobClifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BondDougBondJoeOhChurlCraig JenkinsJ.TaylorCharles Lewis. 2003. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research40 (6): 733–45.
9.
BurgoonBrianRuggeriAdreaSchudelWillemManikkalingamRam. 2015. “From Media Attention to Negotiated Peace: Human Rights Reporting and Civil War Duration.” International Interactions41 (2): 226–55.
10.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPravin K.. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CardenasSonia. 2010. Human Rights in Latin America: A Politics of Terror and Hope. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
CarothersThomasBrechenmacherSaskia. 2014. Closing Space: Democracy and Human Rights Support under Fire. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
13.
CarpenterR. Charli. 2010. Forgetting Children Born of War: Setting the Human Rights Agenda in Bosnia and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
CarpenterR. Charli. 2007. “Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.” International Studies Quarterly51:99–120.
15.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.. 1999. “Measuring the Pattern, Level, and Sequence of Government Respect for Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 407–17.
16.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.. 2010. “The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project.” Human Rights Quarterly32 (2): 401–24
17.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.Chad ClayK.. 2013. The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. Accessed March 17, 2014. http://www.humanrightsdata.com.
18.
ConradCourtenay R.RitterEmily Hencken. 2013. “Treaties, Tenure, and Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law.” The Journal of Politics75 (2): 397–409.
19.
CooleyAlexander2015. “Countering Democratic Norms.” Journal of Democracy26 (3): 49–63.
20.
CooleyAlexanderRonJames. 2002. “The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action.” International Security27 (1): 3–39.
21.
DawsonE. MurellChatmanElfreda A.. 2001. “Reference Group Theory with Implications for Information Studies: A Theoretical Essay.” Information Research6 (3): 105.
22.
DeMerittJacqueline H. R.2012. “International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives?” International Interactions38 (5): 597–621.
23.
Ferrer-i-CarbonellAda. 2005. “Income and Well-being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect.” Journal of Public Economics89 (5): 997–1019.
24.
FrankRobert H.1985. Choosing the Right Pond. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
FranklinJames C.2008. “Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America.” International Studies Quarterly52 (1): 187–211.
26.
FranzeseRobert J.JrHaysJude C.. 2009. “Empirical Modeling of Spatial Interdependence in Time-series Cross-sections.” Methoden der vergleichenden Politik-und Sozialwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 233–61.
27.
FreyBruno S.StutzerAlois. 2002. “What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?” Journal of Economic Literature40 (2): 402–35.
28.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHavard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37
29.
GoldsteinJoshua S.1992. “A Conflict-cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 369–85.
30.
GrayMarkKittlesonMikiSandhotlzWayne. 2006. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975-2000.” International Organization60 (2): 293–333.
31.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M. 2008. “Sticks and Stone: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.” International Organization62 (4): 689–716
32.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.RonJames. 2013. “The Latin Bias: Regions, the Anglo-American Media, and Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly57 (3): 474–91.
33.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.TsutsuiKiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises1.” American Journal of Sociology110 (5): 1373–411.
34.
HaymanRachel. 2016. “Unpacking Civil Society Sustainability: Looking Back, Broader, Deeper, Forward.” Development in Practice26 (5): 670–80.
35.
HendrixCullen S.WongWendy H.. 2013. “When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses.” British Journal of Political Science43 (3): 651–72.
36.
HendrixCullen S.WongWendy H.. 2014. “Knowing Your Audience: How the Structure of International Relations and Organizational Choices Affect Amnesty International’s Advocacy.” The Review of International Organizations9 (1): 29–58.
37.
HillDaniel W.2010. “Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1161–74.
38.
HillDaniel W.MooreWill H.MukherjeeBumba. 2013. “Information Politics versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International’s “Naming and Shaming” Reports Biased?” International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 219–32.
39.
HymanHerbert HiramSingerEleanor, Eds. 1968. Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research. New York: Free Press.
40.
KeckM. E.SikkinkK.. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
KingGaryLoweWill. 2003. “An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design.” International Organization57 (3): 617–42.
42.
KrainMatthew. 2012. “J’accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides?” International Studies Quarterly56 (3): 574–89.
LupuYonatan. 2013. “The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects.” American Journal of Political Science57 (4): 912–25.
MassaroDominic W.AndersonNorman H.. 1971. “Judgmental Model of the Ebbinghaus Illusion.” Journal of Experimental Psychology89 (1): 147.
47.
MeernikJamesAloisiRosaSowellMarshaNicholsAngela. 2012. “The Impact of Human Rights Organizations on Naming and Shaming Campaigns.” Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (2): 233–56.
48.
MurdieAmanda. 2014a. Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
MurdieAmanda. 2014b. “The Ties that Bind: A Network Analysis of Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations.” British Journal of Political Science44 (1): 1–27.
50.
MurdieAmandaBhasinTavishi. 2011. “Aiding and Abetting? Human Rights INGOs and Domestic Anti-government Protest.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (2): 163–91.
51.
MurdieAmandaDavisDavid R.. 2012. “Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs.” International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 1–16.
52.
MurdieAmandaPeksenDursun. 2013. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Sanctions.” Review of International Organizations8 (1): 33–53.
53.
MurdieAmandaPeksenDursun. 2014. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions.” Journal of Politics76 (1): 215–28.
54.
MurdieAmandaUrpelainenJohannes. 2015. “Why Pick on Us? Environmental INGOs and State Shaming as a Strategic Substitute.” Political Studies63 (2): 353–72.
55.
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2012. “Global Terrorism Database” [Data file]. Accessed March 17, 2014. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.
56.
NeumayerEric. 2005. “Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (6): 925–53.
57.
ParkBaekkwanMurdieAmandaDavisDavid R.. 2017. “The (Co)Evolution of Human Rights Shaming: Understanding Human Rights Issue Emergence Over Time.” Working Paper,University of Georgia.
58.
RichardsDavid L. 2016. “The Myth of Information Effects in Human Rights Data.” Human Rights Quarterly38 (2): 477–92.
59.
RichardsDavid L.WebbAlyssaChad ClayK.. 2015. “Respect for Physical Integrity Rights in the Twenty-first Century: Evaluating Poe and Tate’s Model 20 Years Later.” Journal of Human Rights14:291–311.
60.
RisseThomasRisse-KappenThomasRoppStephen C.SikkinkKathryn, eds. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
61.
RisseThomasRoppStephen C.SikkinkKathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
62.
RonJamesRamosHowardRodgersKathleen. 2005. “Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986–2000.” International Studies Quarterly49 (3): 557–88.
63.
SchrodtPhilip. 2015. “Event Data in Forecasting Models: Where Does It Come from, What Can It Do?” Paper presented at the Conference on Forecasting and Early Warning of Conflict, Peace Research Institute, Oslo (Norway), April 22-23, 2015.
64.
SikkinkKathryn. 2015. “Latin America’s Protagonist Role in Human Rights.” Sur International Journal on Human Rights12 (22): 207–19.
65.
SimmonsBeth A.2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
66.
SmithJackieWiestDawn. 2005. “The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association.” Social Forces84:621.
67.
VreelandJames Raymond. 2008. “Political Institutions and Human Rights: Why Dictatorships Enter into the United Nations.” International Organization62 (1): 65–101.
68.
WongWendy H.2012. Internal Affairs: How the structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
