When people learn that demonstrators are being subjected to harsh treatment by the police, sometimes their reaction is to join demonstrations. What explains the potentially mobilizing power of repression? Information-oriented theories posit that repression changes people’s beliefs about the likely success of the protests or the type of the government, thus encouraging them to join. Social–psychological theories posit that repression provokes a moral and emotional reaction from bystanders, and these emotional reactions are mobilizing. Our research offers a rare opportunity to test these theories, empirically, against one another. We offer experimental evidence from Turkey after the 2013 Gezi uprising. In this setting, emotional reactions appear to be the link between repression and backlash mobilization. Information-oriented theories of backlash mobilization may be less germane in democracies, in which people already have access to information about their governments, and in highly polarized polities, in which few people’s political affinities are up for grabs.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.. 2001. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review91 (4): 938–63.
2.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArceneauxKevin. 2012. “Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 271–85.
4.
AytaçS. ErdemSchiumeriniLuisStokesSusan. 2017. “Protests and Repression in New Democracies.” Perspectives on Politics15 (1): 62–82.
5.
AytaçS. ErdemÖnişZiya. 2014. “Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context: The Divergent Paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo.” Comparative Politics47 (1): 41–59.
6.
BaronReubenKennyDavid. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–82.
7.
BeissingerMark. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. MA: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2011. “The Logic of Political Violence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics126 (3): 1411–45.
9.
BlaydesLisaLoJames. 2012. “One Man, One Vote, One Time? A Model of Democratization in the Middle East.” Journal of Theoretical Politics24 (1): 110–46.
10.
BoixCarles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BullockJohnGreenDonaldHaShang. 2010. “Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98 (4): 550–58.
12.
ChenMengquin A.2014. “Who Constructs My Identity? Understanding Turkish Youth in Gezi Protests.” Unpublished typescript, Princeton University, NJ.
13.
ChongDenis. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CrawfordJohn R.HenryJulie D.. 2004. “The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct Validity, Measurement Properties, and Normative Data in a Large Non-clinical Sample.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology43:245–65.
15.
DavenportChristian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science10:1–23.
16.
della PortaDonatella. 2013. Can Democracy be Saved?Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
17.
DeNardoJames. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
DiamondLarry. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy26 (1): 141–55.
19.
El-GhobashyMona. 2011. “The Praxis of the Egyptian Revolution.” Middle East Research and Information Project41 (258): 2–13.
FranciscoRonald A.1995. “The Relationship between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (2): 263–82.
22.
FranciscoRonald A.2004. “After the Massacre: Mobilization in the Wake of Harsh Repression.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly9 (2): 107–26.
GinkelJohnSmithAlastair. 1999. “So You Say You Want a Revolution: A Game-theoretic Explanation of Revolution in Repressive Regimes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (3): 291–316.
25.
GranovetterMark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology83 (6): 1420–43.
26.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–89.
27.
ImaiKosukeYamamotoTeppei. 2013. “Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments.” Political Analysis21 (2): 141–71.
Konda. 2014. Gezi Report: Public Perceptions of the ‘Gezi Protests.’ Who were the People at Gezi Park?Istanbul, Turkey: Konda Arastirma ve Danismanlik.
30.
KuranTimur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics44 (1): 7–48.
31.
LawrenceAdria K. 2016. “Repression and Activism among the Arab Spring’s First Movers: Evidence from Morocco’s February 20th Movement.” British Journal of Political Science1–20. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000733.
32.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-specific Influences on Judgment and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion14 (4): 473–93.
33.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81 (1): 146–59.
34.
LichbachMark. 1987. “Deterrence or Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent.” Journal of Conflict Resolution31 (2): 266–97.
35.
LohmannSusanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989-91.” World Politics47 (1): 42–101.
36.
MarcusGeorge E.NeumanRussellMacKuenMichael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
McAdamDoug. 1986. “Recruitment to High-risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology92 (1): 64–90.
38.
McAdamDoug. 1995. ““Initiator” and “Spin-off” Movements: Diffusion Processes in Protest Cycles.” In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, edited by TraugottMark, 217–40. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
MillerDavid A.CroninTraceyGarciaAmber L.BranscombeNyla R.. 2009. “The Relative Impact of Anger and Efficacy on Collective Action is Affected by Feelings of Fear.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations12 (4): 445–62.
40.
OppKarl-Dieter. 1994. “Repression and Revolutionary Action: East Germany in 1989.” Rationality and Society6 (1): 101–38.
41.
PearlmanWendy. 2013. “Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings.” Perspectives on Politics11 (2): 387–409.
42.
PierskallaJan. 2010. “Protest, Deterrence, and Escalation: The Strategic Calculus of Government Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54 (1): 117–45.
43.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
SiegelDavid A.2011. “When Does Repression Work? Collective Action in Social Networks.” Journal of Politics73 (4): 993–1010.
46.
SvolikMilan W.2013. “Contracting on Violence: The Moral Hazard in Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in Politics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (5): 765–94.
47.
TerraccianoAntonioMcCraeRobert R.CostaPaul T.. 2003. “Factorial and Construct Validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).” European Journal of Psychological Assessment19 (2): 131–41.
48.
ThomasEmma F.McGartyCraigMavorKenneth I.. 2009. “Transforming ‘Apathy into Movement’: The Role of Prosocial Emotions in Motivating Action for Social Change.” Personality and Social Psychology Review13 (4): 310–33.
49.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” Journal of Politics73 (1): 156–70.
50.
van StekelenburgJacquelienKlandermansBert. 2013. “The Social Psychology of Protest.” Current Sociology Review61 (5–6): 886–905.
51.
van ZomerenMartijn. 2013. “Four Core Social-psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass7 (6): 378–88.
52.
van ZomerenMartijnSpearsRussellFischerAgneta H.LeachColin Wayne. 2004. “Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies through Group-based Anger and Group Efficacy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87 (5): 649–64.
53.
Waismel-ManorIsraelIferganeGalCohenHagit. 2011. “When Endocrinology and Democracy Collide: Emotions, Cortisol and Voting at National Elections.” European Neuropsychopharmacology21 (11): 789–95.
54.
WasowOmer. 2016. “Do Protest Tactics Matter? Evidence from the 1960s Black Insurgency.” Paper presented at the Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration Colloquium, University of California, Berkeley, CA, February 9, 2016.
55.
WatsonDavidClarkLee AnnaTellegenAuke. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54 (6): 1063–70.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
