An interesting stream of the civil conflict literature has identified an important subset of civil conflicts with disastrous consequences, that is, those that emerge as a consequence of shocks to renewable natural resources like land and water. This literature is, however, reliant on qualitative case studies when claiming a causal relationship leading from renewable resource shocks to conflict. In this article, we seek to advance the literature by drawing out the implications of a well-known formal model of the renewable resources–conflict relationship and then conducting rigorous statistical tests of its implications in the case of a serious ongoing civil conflict in India. We find that a one standard deviation decrease in our measure of renewable resources increases killings by nearly 60 percent over the long run.
AbadieAlbertoGardeazabalJavier. 2003. “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country.”American Economic Review93 (1): 113–32.
2.
BesleyTimothy J.PerssonTorsten. 2008. “The Incidence of Civil War: Theory and Evidence.”Working Paper 14585, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
3.
BanerjeeSumanta. 1980. In the Wake of Naxalbari: A History of the Naxalite Movement in India. Calcutta, India: Subarnarekha.
4.
BhatiaBela. 2005. “The Naxalite Movement in Central Bihar.”Economic and Political Weekly40:1536–43.
5.
BlattmanChristopherMiguelEdward. 2009. “Civil War.”Working Paper No. 14801, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
6.
BoharaAlok K.NepalManiGawandeKishore. 2011. “More Inequality, More Killings: The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal.”American Journal of Political Science55:886–906.
7.
BorooahVani K.2008. “Deprivation, Violence, and Conflict: An Analysis of Naxalite Activity in the Districts of India.”International Journal of Conflict and Violence2 (2): 317–33.
8.
BoschettiM.StroppianaD.BrivioP. A.BocchiS.. 2009. “Multi-year Monitoring of Rice Crop Phenology through Time Series Analysis of MODIS Images.”International Journal of Remote Sensing30:4643–62.
9.
CerraValerieSaxenaSweta Chaman. 2008. “Growth Dynamics: The Myth of Economic Recovery.”The American Economic Review98 (1): 439–57.
10.
ChassangSylvainPadró-i-MiquelGerard. 2009. “Economic Shocks and Civil War.”Quarterly Journal of Political Science4 (3): 211–28.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.”Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
13.
CoxNicholas J.2008. “Speaking Stata: Correlation with Confidence, or Fisher’s z Revisited.”Stata Journal8 (3): 413–39.
14.
Dal BóErnestoBóPedro Dal. 2011. “Workers, Warriors, and Criminals: Social Conflict in General Equilibrium.”Journal of the European Economic Association9 (4): 646–77.
15.
D’ArrigoR. D.MalmstromC. M.JacobyG. C.LosS. O.BunkerD. E.. 2000. “Correlation between Maximum Latewood Density of Annual Tree Rings and NDVI Based Estimates of Forest Productivity.”International Journal of Remote Sensing21:2329–36.
16.
DeatonAngusDrèzeJean. 2009. “Food and Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations.”Economic and Political Weekly44:42–65.
17.
De BoefSuzannaKeeleLuke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.”American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 184–200.
18.
DubeOeindrilaVargasJuan. 2013. “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.”Review of Economic Studies80 (4): 1384–421.
FearonJamesLaitinDavid. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War.”American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
21.
FisherRonald A.1990. Statistical Methods, Experimental Design, and Scientific Inference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
GhobarahHazem AdamHuthPaulRussettBruce. 2003. “Civil Wars Kill and Maim People—Long after the Shooting Stops.”American Political Science Review97 (2): 189–202.
HastieTrevorTibshiraniRobertFriedmanJerome. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
HaugeWencheEllingsenTanja. 1998. “Beyond Environmental Security: Causal Pathways to Conflict.”Journal of Peace Research35 (3): 299–317.
Homer-DixonThomas. 1994. “Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases.”International Security19 (1): 5–40.
29.
Homer-DixonThomas. 1999. Environment, Security, and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HumphriesMacartanWeinsteinJeremy. 2008. “Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War.”American Journal of Political Science52 (2): 436–55.
31.
IyerLakshmi. 2009. “The Bloody Millennium: Internal Conflict in South Asia.”Working Paper No. 09-086, Harvard Business School BGIE Unit, Boston, MA.
32.
JustinoPatriciaVerwimpPhilip. 2006. “Poverty Dynamics, Conflict and Convergence in Rwanda.”Households in Conflict Network, Working Paper 16. Accessed April 28, 2012. http://www.hicn.org/pappers/wp16.pdf.
33.
KahlColin. 2006. States, Security, and Civil Strife in the Developing World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
LabusM. P.NielsenG. A.LawrenceR. L.EngelR.LongD. S.. 2002. “Wheat Yield Estimates Using Multi-temporal NDVI Satellite Imagery.”International Journal of Remote Sensing23 (20): 4169–80.
35.
MoreiraMarcelo J.2003. “A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models.”Econometrica71 (4): 1027–48.
36.
MiguelEdwardSatyanathShankerSergentiErnest. 2004. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach.”Journal of Political Economy112 (4): 725–53.
37.
MildnerStromy-AnnilaLausterGittaWodnyWiebke. 2011. “Scarcity and Abundance Revisited: A Literature Review on Natural Resources and Conflict.”International Journal of Conflict and Violence5 (1): 155–72.
38.
MurdochJames C.SandlerTodd. 2002. “Econonomic Growth, Spatial Spillovers, and Civil War.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 91–110.
39.
MyneniR.TuckerC.AsrarG.KeelingC.. 1998. “Inter-annual Variations in Satellite-sensed Vegetation Index Data from 1981 to 1991.”Journal of Geophysical Research103 (D6): 6145–60.
40.
NemaniR. R.KeelingC. D.HashimotoH.JollyW. M.PiperS. C.TuckerC. J.MyneniR. B.RunningS. W.. 2003. “Climate-driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999.”Science300:1560–63.
41.
PanigrahyRabindra K.KaleManish P.DuttaUpasanaMishraAsimaBanerjeeBishwarupSinghSarnam. 2010. “Forest Cover Change Detection of Western Ghats of Maharashtra Using Satellite Remote Sensing Based Visual Interpretation.”Current Science98 (5): 657–64.
42.
PatnaikUtsa. 2010. “A Critical Look at Some Propositions on Consumption and Poverty.”Economic and Political Weekly45 (6): 74–80.
RajeevanM.BhateJyotiKaleJ. D.LalB.. 2006. “High Resolution Daily Gridded Rainfall Data for the Indian Region: Analysis of Break and Active Monsoon Spells.”Current Science91:296–306.
SinghPrakash. 1995. The Naxalite Movement in India. New Delhi: Rupa and Co.
48.
SinghaRoyDebal K.2004. Peasants’ Movements in Post-colonial India. New Delhi, India: Sage.
49.
StockJames H.YogoMotohiro. 2004. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference in Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, edited by AndrewsD. W. K.StockJ. H., 80–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
TheisenOle Magnus. 2008. “Blood and Soil: Resource Scarcity and Armed Conflict Revisited.”Journal of Peace Research45:801–18.
51.
TuckerC. J.SlaybackD. A.PinzonJ. E.LosS. O.MyneniR. B.TaylorM. G.. 2001. “Higher Northern Latitude Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Growing Season Trends from 1982 to 1999.”International Journal of Biometeorology45:184–90.
52.
VerwimpPhilip. 2003. “Testing the Double Genocide Thesis for Central and Southern Rwanda.”Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (4): 423–42.
53.
VerwimpPhilip. 2005. “An Economic Profile of Peasant Perpetrators of Genocide: Micro Level Evidence from Rwanda.”Journal of Development Economics77 (2): 297–323.
54.
WardMichael D.GreenhillBrian D.BakkeKristin M.. 2010. “The Perils of Policy by p-Value: Predicting Civil Conflicts.”Journal of Peace Research47 (4): 363–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
