We experimentally investigate the effect of social identification and information feedback on individual behavior in contests. In all treatments, we find significant overexpenditure of effort relative to the standard theoretical predictions. Identifying subjects through photo display decreases wasteful effort. Providing information feedback about others’ effort does not affect the aggregate effort, but it decreases the heterogeneity of effort and significantly affects the dynamics of individual behavior. A behavioral model that incorporates a nonmonetary utility of winning and relative payoff maximization explains significant overexpenditure of effort. It also suggests that decrease in “social distance” between group members through social identification promotes prosocial behavior and decreases overexpenditure of effort, while improved information feedback decreases the heterogeneity of effort.
AmaldossW.RapoportA.. 2009. “Excessive Expenditure in Two-stage Contests: Theory and Experimental Evidence.” In Game Theory: Strategies, Equilibria, and Theorems, edited by ColumbusF., 241–66. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
2.
AndreoniJ.PetrieR.. 2004. “Public Goods Experiments without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-raising.”Journal of Public Economics88:1605–23.
3.
AzmatG.IriberriN.. 2010. “The Importance of Relative Performance Feedback Information: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Using High School Students.”Journal of Public Economics94: 435–52.
4.
Blanes i VidalJ.NossolM.. 2011. “Tournaments without Prizes: Evidence from Personnel Records.”Management Science57:1721–36.
5.
BohnetI.FreyB. S.. 1999a. “Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment.”American Economic Review89:335–39.
6.
BohnetI.FreyB. S.. 1999b. “The Sound of Silence in Prisoner’s Dilemma and Dictator Games.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization38:43–57.
7.
BrookinsP.RyvkinD.. 2014. “An Experimental Study of Bidding in Contests of Incomplete Information.”Experimental Economics17:245–61.
8.
BullC.SchotterA.WeigeltK.. 1987. “Tournaments and Piece Rates: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Political Economy95:1–33.
9.
BurnhamT. C.2003. “Engineering Altruism: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Anonymity and Gift Giving.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization50:133–44.
10.
CasonT. N.MastersW. A.SheremetaR. M.. 2010. “Entry into Winner-take-all and Proportional-prize Contests: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Public Economics94:604–11.
11.
CasonT. N.MastersW. A.SheremetaR. M.. 2011. “Winner-take-all and Proportional-prize Contests: Theory and Experimental Results.” ESI Working Paper. Chapman University, Orange, CA.
12.
CasonT. N.SheremetaR. M.ZhangJ.. 2012. “Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games.”Games and Economic Behavior76:26–43.
13.
ChowdhuryS. M.SheremetaR. M.TurocyT. L.. 2014. “Overbidding and Overspreading in Rent-seeking Experiments: Cost Structure and Prize Allocation Rules.”Games and Economic Behavior87:224–38.
14.
DavisD.ReillyR.. 1998. “Do Many Cooks Always Spoil the Stew? An Experimental Analysis of Rent Seeking and the Role of a Strategic Buyer.”Public Choice95:89–115.
15.
DechenauxE.KovenockD.SheremetaR. M.. 2015. “A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-pay Auctions and Tournaments.”Experimental Economics18:609–669.
16.
DeckC.SheremetaR. M.. 2012. “Fight or Flight? Defending Against Sequential Attacks in the Game of Siege.”Journal of Conflict Resolution56:1069–88.
17.
DufwenbergM.GneezyU.. 2002. “Information Disclosure in Auctions: An Experiment.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization48:431–44.
EckelC.WilsonR.. 2006. “Internet Cautions: Experimental Games with Internet Partners.”Experimental Economics9:53–66.
20.
Engelbrecht-WiggansR.KatokE.. 2007. “Regret in Auctions: Theory and Evidence.”Economic Theory33:81–101.
21.
Engelbrecht-WiggansR.KatokE.. 2008. “Regret and Feedback Information in First-price Sealed-bid Auctions.”Management Science54:808–19.
22.
Engelbrecht-WiggansR.KatokE.. 2009. “A Direct Test of Risk Aversion and Regret in First Price Sealed-bid Auctions.”Decision Analysis6:75–86.
23.
ErikssonT.PoulsenA.VillevalM. C.. 2009. “Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence.”Labour Economics16: 679–88.
24.
FallucchiF.RennerE.SeftonM.. 2013. “Information Feedback and Contest Structure in Rent-seeking Games.”European Economic Review64:223–40.
25.
FehrE.SchmidtK.. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.”Quarterly Journal of Economics114:817–68.
26.
FischbacherU.2007. “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments.”Experimental Economics10:171–78.
27.
FischbacherU.GächterS.FehrE.. 2001. “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment.”Economics Letters71 (3): 397–404.
28.
FreyB. S.StutzerA.. 2002. “What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?”Journal of Economic Literature40:402–35.
29.
GürtlerO.HarbringC.. 2010. “Feedback in Tournaments under Commitment Problems: Experimental Evidence.”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy19:771–810.
30.
HamiltonW. D.1970. “Selfish and Spiteful Behavior in Evolutionary Model.”Nature228:1218–20.
31.
HarbringC.IrlenbuschB.KrakelM.SeltenR.. 2007. “Sabotage in Corporate Contests—An Experimental Analysis.”International Journal of the Economics of Business14:367–92.
32.
HehenkampB.LeiningerW.PossajenikovA.. 2004. “Evolutionary Equilibrium in Tullock Contests: Spite and Overdissipation.”European Journal of Political Economy20:1045–57.
33.
HoffmanE.McCabeK.SmithV.. 1996. “Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.”American Economic Review86:653–60.
34.
IsaacR.WalkerJ. M.. 1985. “Information and Conspiracy in Sealed-bid Auctions.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization6:139–59.
35.
KalraA.ShiM.. 2010. “Consumer Value Maximizing Sweepstakes and Contests.”Journal of Marketing Research47:287–300.
36.
KuhnenC. M.TymulaA.. 2012. “Feedback, Self-esteem and Performance in Organizations.”Management Science58:94–113.
37.
LeiningerW.2003. “On Evolutionarily Stable Behavior in Contests.”Economics of Governance4:177–86.
38.
LudwigS.LünserG. K.. 2012. “Observing Your Competitor—The Role of Effort Information in Two-stage Tournaments.”Journal of Economic Psychology33:166–82.
39.
MagoS. D.SheremetaR. M.YatesA.. 2013. “Best-of-three Contest Experiments: Strategic Versus Psychological Momentum.”International Journal of Industrial Organization31:287–96.
40.
McCarterM. W.SamakA. C.SheremetaR. M.. 2014. “Divided Loyalists or Conditional Cooperators? A Study of Cooperation When Facing Multiple Social Dilemmas.”Working Paper.
NoussairC.PorterD.. 1992. “Allocating Priority with Auctions: An Experimental Analysis.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization19:169–95.
43.
ParcoJ. E.RapoportA.AmaldossW.. 2005. “Two-stage Contests with Budget Constraints: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Mathematical Psychology49:320–38.
44.
PottersJ. C.De VriesC. G.Van WindenF.. 1998. “An Experimental Examination of Rational Rent Seeking.”European Journal of Political Economy14:783–800.
45.
PriceC. R.SheremetaR. M.. 2011. “Endowment Effects in Contests.”Economics Letters111:217–19.
46.
PriceC. R.SheremetaR. M.. 2015. “Endowment Origin, Demographic Effects and Individual Preferences in Contests.”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy24:597–619.
47.
RiechmannT.2007. “An Analysis of Rent-seeking Games with Relative-payoff Maximizers.”Public Choice133:147–55.
48.
RietzT. A.SheremetaR. M.ShieldsT. W.SmithV. L.. 2013. “Transparency, Efficiency and the Distribution of Economic Welfare in Pass-through Investment Trust Games.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization94:257–67.
49.
SamekA. S.SheremetaR. M.. 2014. “Recognizing Contributors: An Experiment on Public Goods.”Experimental Economics17:673–690.
50.
SavikhinA. S.SheremetaR. M.. 2013. “Simultaneous Decision-making in Competitive and Cooperative Games.”Economic Inquiry51:1311–23.
51.
ScharlemannJ. P.EckelC. C.KacelnikA.WilsonR. K.. 2001. “The Value of a Smile: Game Theory with a Human Face.”Journal of Economic Psychology22:617–40.
52.
SheremetaR. M.2010a. “Expenditures and Information Disclosure in Two-stage Political Contests.”Journal of Conflict Resolution54:771–98.
53.
SheremetaR. M.2010b. “Experimental Comparison of Multi-stage and One-stage Contests.”Games and Economic Behavior68:731–47.
54.
SheremetaR. M.2011. “Contest Design: An Experimental Investigation.”Economic Inquiry49:573–90.
55.
SheremetaR. M.2013. “Overbidding and Heterogeneous Behavior in Contest Experiments.”Journal of Economic Surveys27:491–514.
56.
SheremetaR. M.ZhangJ.. 2010. “Can Groups Solve the Problem of Over-bidding in Contests?”Social Choice and Welfare35:175–97.
57.
SmithV. L.1991. Papers in Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SmitherJ. W.LondonM.ReillyR. R.. 2005. “Does Performance Improve Following Multisource Feedback? A Theoretical Model, Meta-analysis, and Review of Empirical Findings.”Personnel Psychology58:33–66.
59.
TajfelH.TurnerJ.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by WorchelStephenAustinWilliam, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
60.
TullockG.1980. “Efficient Rent Seeking.” In Toward a Theory of the Rent-seeking Society, edited by BuchananJ. M.TollisonR. D.TullockG., 97–112. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
