Using evidence from voting in the UN General Assembly (UNGA), this article shows that leader turnover, especially in small coalition, nondemocratic systems, increases the likelihood of policy realignment. Autocrats who are beholden to only a small proportion of the population represent the foreign policy interests of their small number of supporters. When leader turnover occurs, the interests represented often shift too and this results in an increased volatility and regression toward a neutral position of a nation’s alignment at the United Nations vis-à-vis the United States. While such realignments can offer an opportunity to reduce enmity between states, they can also signal growing differences between friends. The impact of leaders change in large coalitions produces more moderate shifts in alignments.
BarroRobert J.LeeJong-Wha. 2005. “IMF Programs: Who Is Chosen and What Are the Effects?” Journal of Monetary Economics52:1245–69.
5.
BaileyMichaelStrezhnevAntonVoetenErik. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (September 25, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2330913.
6.
BobickTalyaSmithAlastair. 2013. “The Impact of Leader Turnover on the Onset and the Resolution of WTO Disputes.” Review of International Organizations8 (4): 423–45.
7.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceMorrowJames D.SiversonRandolph M.SmithAlastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review93 (4): 791–807.
8.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceMorrowJames D.SiversonRandolph M.SmithAlastair. 2004. “Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War.” World Politics56 (April): 363–88.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSiversonRandolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review89 (4): 841–55.
10.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastair. 2007. “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution51 (2): 251–84.
11.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastair. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook. New York: Public Affairs Press.
12.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastair. 2012. “Domestic Explanations of International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science15:161–81.
13.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolphMorrowJames D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
CarrollRoyceLeedsBrett AshleyMattesMichaela. 2012. Leadership Turnover and Foreign Policy Change: Societal Interests, Domestic Institutions and Voting in the United Nations. Working Paper, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
15.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansHein. 2011. Leaders and International Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CrocoSarah. 2011. “The Decider’s Dilemma: Leader Culpability, Domestic Politics and War Termination.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 457–77.
17.
DixonWilliam J.1981. “The Emerging Image of U.N. Politics.” World Politics34:47–61.
18.
DreherAxelJensenNathan M.. 2013. Country or Leader? Political Change and UN General Assembly Voting. European Journal of Political Economy29:183–96.
19.
DreherAxelNunnenkampPeterThieleRainer. 2008. “Does US Aid Buy UN General Assembly Votes? A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice136 (1): 139–64.
20.
DreherAxelSturmJan-Egbert. 2012. “Do the IMF and the World Bank Influence Voting in the UN General Assembly?” Public Choice151 (1): 363–97.
21.
DreherAxelSturmJan-EgbertVreelandJames. 2009. “Development Aid and International Politics: Does Membership on the UN Security Council Influence World Bank Decisions?” Journal of Development Economics88:1–18.
22.
GartzkeErik. 1998. “Kant We All Just Get along?: Opportunity, Willingness and the Origins of the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 1–27.
GoemansHeinGleditschKristian SkredeChiozzaGiacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 269–83.
25.
GoldsteinJoshua S.2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HollowaySteven. 1990. “Forty Years of United Nations General Assembly Voting.” Canadian Journal of Political Science23:279–96.
27.
HollowayStevenTomlinsonRodney. 1995. “The New World Order and the General Assembly: Bloc Realignment at the U.N. in the Post-Cold War.” Canadian Journal of Political Science28:227–54.
28.
HorowitzMichaelMcDermottRoseStamAllan C.. 2005. “Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (5): 661–85.
29.
JonesBenjamin F.OlkenBenjamin A.. 2005. “Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth since World War II.” Quarterly Journal of Economics120 (3): 835–64.
30.
KimSoo YeonRussettBruce. 1996. “The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly.” International Organization50 (4): 629–52.
31.
LeedsBrett AshleyMattesMichaelaVogelJeremy S.. 2009. “Interests, Institutions, and the Reliability of International Commitments.” American Journal of Political Science53 (2): 461–76.
32.
LijphartArend. 1963. “The Analysis of Bloc Voting in the General Assembly: A Critique and a Proposal.” American Political Science Review57 (4): 902–17.
33.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed RobertJaggersKeith. 2012. Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012. Dataset Users’Manual. University of Maryland: Center for Systemic Peace.
34.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair. 2004. “The Impact of Leadership Turnover on Relations between States.” International Organization58:567–600.
35.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair. 2005. “The Impact of Leadership Turnover and Domestic Institutions on International Cooperation in a Noisy World.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49:639–60.
36.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair. 2008. Punishing the Prince. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair. 2009. “Political Groups, Leader Change, and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53:853–77.
38.
McGillivrayFionaStamAllan C.. 2004. “Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (2): 154–72.
39.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2009. “Does Government Ideology Influence Political Alignment with the U.S.? An Empirical Analysis of Voting in the UN General Assembly.” Review of International Organizations4:245–68.
40.
RaiK. B.1980. “Foreign Aid and Voting in the UN General Assembly, 1967-1976.” Journal of Peace Research17 (3): 269–77.
41.
SignorinoCurtis S.RitterJeffrey M.. 1999. “Tau-b or Not tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.” International Studies Quarterly43:115–44.
42.
StoneRandall W.2002. Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Post-Communist Transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
ThackerStrom C.1999. “The High Politics of IMF Lending.” World Politics52:38–75.
44.
VoetenErik. 2000. “Clashes in the Assembly.” International Organization54 (2): 185–215.
45.
VoetenErik. 2004. “Resisting the Lonely Superpower: Responses of States in the UN to U.S. Dominance.” The Journal of Politics66 (3): 729–54.
46.
VoetenErik. 2013. “Data and Analyses of voting in the United Nations General Assembly.” In Routledge Handbook of International Organization, edited by ReinaldaBob, p. 54–66. London and New York: Routledge.
47.
WaltzKenneth Neal. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48.
WeeksJessica L.2012. “Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review106 (02): 326–47.
49.
WolfordScott. 2007. “The Turnover Trap: New Leaders, Reputation, and International Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 772–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
