Idealized independent media function as “watchdogs.” Indeed, human rights nongovernmental organizations have argued that media freedom will improve human rights. This makes sense intuitively, yet recent formal and empirical studies show that the effect of independent media varies across regime types. We explore the relationship among media, government, and citizen protest movements and employ a game-theoretic model to investigate how the equilibria vary depending on regime type and media independence. In terms of equilibrium, we find that media watchdogging is most active in autocracies (and not in democracies), especially when the government’s perceived capability to repress public protest is declining. Uncertainty about the government’s ability to repress plays a central role in accounting for the manifestation of media watchdogging in conjunction with public protest. Illustrations from Tunisia and North Korea are provided to highlight equilibria derived from the formal model that vary as a product of perceptions about the government’s ability to repress.
AbouharbM. RodwanCingranelliDavid. 2009. “IMP Programs and Human Rights, 1981-2003.”Review of International Organizations4 (1): 47–72.
2.
AndersonC. W.2010. “Journalistic Networks and the Diffusion of Local News: The Brief, Happy News Life of the ‘Francisville Four.’”Political Communication27:289–309.
3.
BarrattBethany. 2004. “Aiding or Abetting? Human Rights and British Foreign Aid Decisions.” In Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies, edited by CareySabine C.PoeSteven C., 43–62. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
4.
BenklerYochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
5.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-state Relations in the United States.”Journal of Communication40 (2): 103–25.
6.
BennettW. LanceLawrenceRegina G.LivingstonSteven. 2007. When the Press Fails. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
Bueno deMesquitaBruceGeorge W. DownsSmithAlastairCherifFeryal Marie. 2005. “Thinking Inside the Box: A Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights.”International Studies Quarterly49 (3): 439–57.
8.
CareySabine C.2006. “The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression.”Political Research Quarterly59 (1): 1–11.
9.
ChoiSeung-WhanJamesPatrick. 2006. “Media Openness, Democracy and Militarized Interstate Disputes: An Empirical Analysis.”British Journal of Political Science37:23–46.
Cioffi-RevillaClaudioStarrHarvey. 1995. “Opportunity, Willingness, and Political Uncertainty: Theoretical Foundations of Politics.”Journal of Theoretical Politics7 (4): 447–76.
12.
Committee to Protect Journalists. 2009. Journalists Killed. Accessed date April 3, 2009. Available fromwww.cpj.org/deadly.
13.
Committee to Protect Journalists. 2009. Orel Sambrano.
DavenportChristian. 2007. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DavenportChristian. 2010. Media Bias, Perspective, and State Repression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DavenportChristianArmstrongDavid A.. 2004. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.”American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 538–54.
DeMeritt, JacquelineH. R.YoungJoseph K.. 2013. “A Political Economy of Human Rights: Oil, Natural Gas, and State Incentives to Repress.”Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (2): 99–120.
20.
EgorovGeorgyGurievSergei M.SoninKonstantin. 2009. “Why Resource-poor dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data.”American Political Science Review103 (4): 645–68.
21.
EntmanRobert M.2004. Projections of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FahimKareem. 2011. “Slap to a Man's Pride Set off Tumult in Tunisia.”New York Times, 121.
23.
FarisDavid. 2013. Dissent and Revolution in a Digital Age: Social Media, Blogging and Activism in Egypt. London: I. B. Tauris.
24.
FranciscoRonald A.2005. “The Dictator's Dilemma.” In Repression and Mobilization, edited by DavenportChristianJohnstonHankMuellerCarol, 58–81. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
GerringJohnSeawrightJason. 2007. “Techniques for Choosing Cases.” In Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, edited by GerringJohn, 86–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GoldsmithJackWuTim. 2008. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GoldstoneJack A.TillyCharles. 2001. “Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action.” In Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics, edited by AminzadeRonald R.GoldstoneJack A.McAdamDougPerryElizabeth J.JrSewellWilliam H.TarrowSidneyTillyCharles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie Marie. 2005. “Right or Robust? The Sensitive Nature of Political Repression in an Era of Globalization.”Journal of Peace Research42 (6): 679–98.
32.
HamiltonJames T.2004. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
HooverDeanKowalewskiDavid. 1992. “Dynamic Models of Dissent and Repression.”Journal of Conflict Resolution36:150–82.
34.
HowardPhilip N.2011. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
JenkinsJ. Craig. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.”Annual Review of Sociology9:527–53.
36.
KingGaryKeohaneRobertVerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret E.. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Action.”American Political Science Review107 (2): 326–43.
38.
KovachBillRosenstielTom. 2007. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
39.
KuranTimur. 1989. “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution.”Public Choice61:41–74.
40.
LessigLawrence. 2001The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.
41.
LichbachMark Irving. 1987. “Deterrence or Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent.”Journal of Conflict Resolution31:266–97.
42.
LohmannSusanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989-91”World Politics47:42–101.
43.
LohmannSusanne. 2000. “Collective Action Cascades: An Informational Rational for the Power in Numbers.”Journal of Economic Surveys14:655–84.
MaillandJulien. 2010. “The Semantic Web and Information Flow: A Legal Framework.”North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology11 (Spring): 269.
46.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed RobertJaggersKeith. 2010. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2009,” edited by Center for Systemic Peace. Accessed date October 3, 2012. www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.html.
47.
MasonDavid T.1984. “Individual Participation in Collective Racial Violence: A Rational Choice Synthesis.”American Political Science Review78:1040–56.
48.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82 (6): 1212–41.
50.
McCormickJames M.MitchellNeil J.. 1997. “Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts, and Empirical Analysis.”World Politics49 (4): 510–25.
51.
MerminJonathan. 1999. Debating War and Peace: Media Coverage of U.S. Intervention in the Post-vietnam Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
MooreWill H.1995. “Rational Rebels: Overcoming the Free-rider Problem.”Political Research Quarterly48:417–54.
53.
MooreWill H.2000. “The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion.”Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (1): 233–51.
54.
MostBenjamin A.StarrHarvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
55.
NipJoyce. 2006. “Exploring the Second Phase of Public Journalism.”Journalism Studies7 (2): 221–36.
PoeSteven C.2004. “The Decision to Repress: An Integrative Theoretical Approach to the Research on Human Rights and Repression.” In Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies, edited by CareySabine C.PoeSteven C., 16–38. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
58.
PoeSteven C.Neal TateC.. 1994. “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.”American Political Science Review88 (4): 853–72.
59.
PoeSteven C.Neal TateC.KeithLinda Camp. 1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-national Study Covering the Years 1976-1993.”International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 291–313.
60.
PotterPhilipBaumMatthew. 2014. “Looking for Audience Costs in all the Wrong Places: Electoral Institutions, Media Access and Dispute Reciprocation.”Journal of Politics76 (1):167–181.
61.
RaslerKaren. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.”American Sociological Review61 (1): 132–52.
RoederPhilip G.1982. “Rational Revolution: Extensions of the ‘By-product’ Model of Revolutionary Involvement.”Political Research Quarterly35:5–23.
65.
SchudsonMichael. 2003. The Sociology of News. New York: W. W. Norton.
66.
ShellmanStephen M.2006. “Leaders' Motivations and Actions: Explaining Government-dissident Conflict-cooperation Processes.”Conflict Management and Peace Science23:73–90.
67.
SniderErin A.FarisDavid M.. 2011. “The Arab Spring: US Democracy Promotion in Egypt.”Middle East Policy18 (3): 49–62.
68.
TsuiLokman. 2010. A Journalism of Hospitality, Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
69.
TullockGordon. 1971. “The Paradox of Revolution.”Public Choice11:89–99.
70.
“US Embassy Cables: Tunisia—A US Foreign Policy Conundrum.”2010. The Guardian, 127, 2010.
71.
UslanerEric M.2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
VanBelleDouglasA. 1997. “Press Freedom and the Democratic Peace.”Journal of Peace Research34 (4): 405–14.
73.
WaisbordSilvio. 2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America. New York: Columbia University Press.
74.
WelshMay Ying. 2011. Bahrain: Shouting in the Dark. Doha, Qatar: Al Jazeera.
75.
Whitten-WoodringJenifer. 2009. “Watchdog or Lapdog: Media Freedom, Regime Type and Government Respect for Human Rights.”International Studies Quarterly53:595–625.
76.
Whitten-WoodringJeniferJamesPatrick. 2012. “Fourth Estate or Mouthpiece? A Formal Model of Media, Protest, and Government Repression.”Political Communication29 (2): 113–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
