The usual purpose of negotiations is to explore options and reach an agreement, if possible. We investigated a notable exception to this generalization, where a party negotiates without any intention of reaching an agreement. False negotiation occurs when a party gains more by stalling the negotiations until an external change takes place that improves its position considerably. While false negotiators aim to avoid agreement within the current frame of the negotiations, they also aim to keep the negotiation process alive, since walking away from the negotiation table could endanger their position. We report the results of a study that compared the actions of false and sincere negotiators. The false negotiators used competitive tactics that encumbered the negotiations, yet they concealed their intentions by maintaining a facade of cooperation. Our theoretical discussion is focused on the balancing act involved in false negotiations and the challenges it poses for actors in social, managerial, and political settings. We conclude our analysis with an example from the realm of international negotiations.
BazermanMax H.NealeMargaret A.. 1992. Negotiating Rationally. New York: Free Press.
5.
BolesTerry L.CrosonRachel T. A.Keith MurnighanJ.. 2000. “Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes83:235–59.
6.
CarnevalePeter J.PruittDean J.. 1992. “Negotiation and Mediation.” Annual Review of Psychology43:531–82.
7.
CohenJacob.1992. “Statistical Power Analysis.” Current Directions in Psychological Science1:98–101.
8.
De DreuK. W. CarstenCarnevalePeter. J.. 2003. “Motivational Bases of Information Processing and Strategy in Conflict and Negotiation.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by ZanaMark P., 235–91. New York: Academic Press.
9.
De DreuK. W. CarstenMcCuskerChristopher. 1997. “Gain-loss Frames and Cooperation in Two-person Social Dilemmas: A Transformational Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72:1093–106.
10.
DroletAimee L.MorrisMichael W.. 2000. “Rapport in Conflict Resolution: Accounting for How Face-to-face Contact Fosters Mutual Cooperation in Mixed-motive Conflict.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology36:26–50.
11.
FisherRogerWillliamUry. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
FrankMark G.EkmanPaul. 1997. “The Ability to Detect Deceit Generalizes across Different Types of High-stake Lies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72:1429–39.
13.
GordonThomas.1977. Leader Effectiveness Training. New York: Wyden Books.
14.
HornsteinHarvey A.1965. “The Effects of Different Magnitudes of Threat upon Interpersonal Bargaining.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology1:282–93.
LambBerton L.G. TaylorJonathanBurkardtNinaC. GilletteShana. 2005. “The Effects of Urgency to Reach Agreement on the Process and Outcome of Multi-party Natural Resource Negotiations.” International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior8:372–95.
17.
LaxDavid J.SebeniusJames K.. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.
18.
LaxDavid J.SebeniusJames K.. 2006. 3-D Negotiations: Powerful Tool to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
LewickiRoy J.RobinsonRobert J.. 1998. “Ethical and Unethical Bargaining Tactics: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Business Ethics17:665–82.
21.
LewickiRoy J.StarkNeil. 1996. “What Is Ethically Appropriate in Negotiations: An Empirical Examination of Bargaining Tactics.” Social Justice Research9:69–95.
22.
MnookinRobert H.1993. “Why Negotiation Fail: An Exploration of Barriers to the Resolution of Conflict.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution8:235–50.
23.
MnookinRobert H.PeppetScott R.TulumelloAndrew S.. 1996. “The Tension between Empathy and Assertiveness.” Negotiation Journal12:217–30.
24.
MurnighanJ. K.1991. The Dynamics of Bargaining Games. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
NadlerJanice. 2004a. “Rapport in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution.” Marquette Law Review77:875–82.
26.
NadlerJanice.2004b. “Rapport in Legal Negotiations: How Small Talk Can Facilitate E-mail Dealmaking.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review9:223–51.
27.
OlekalnsMaraSmithPhilip L.. 1999. “Social Value Orientations and Strategy Choices in Competitive Negotiations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25:657–68.
28.
OlekalnsMaraSmithPhilip L.WalshTherese. 1996. “The Process of Negotiating: Strategy and Timing as Predictors of Outcomes.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes68:68–77.
29.
PaesePaul W.SchreiberAnn M.TaylorAdam W.. 2003. “Caught Telling the Truth: Effects of Honesty and Communication Media in Distributive Negotiations.” Group Decision and Negotiation12:537–66.
30.
PruittDean G.1983. “Strategic Choice in Negotiation.” American Behavioral Scientist27:167–94.
31.
RaiffaHoward. 1982. The Art & Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
RubinJeffrey Z.SanderFrank E. A.. 1988. “When Should We Use Agents? Direct vs. Representative Negotiation.” Negotiation Journal4:395–401.
34.
SchellingThomas C.1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Boston: Harvard University Press.
35.
SchweitzerMaurice E.DeChurchLeslie A.GibsonDonald E.. 2005. “Conflict Frames and the Use of Deception: Are Competitive Negotiators Less Ethical?” Journal of Applied Social Psychology35:2123–49.
ShapiroDebra L.BiesRobert J.. 1994. “Threats, Bluffs, and Disclaimers in Negotiations.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes60:14–35.
38.
SheehyBenedict. 2006. “E-Negotiations: Rapport Building, Anonymity and Attribution.” Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal17 (4): 221–32.
39.
StevensCarl M.1963. Strategy and Collective Bargaining Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
SusskindLawrenceMcKearnanSarahThomas-LarmerJennifer. 1999. The Consensus-building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
ThompsonLeigh. 1990. “Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Issues.” Psychological Bulletin108:515–32.
42.
ThompsonLeigh L.WangJiunwenGuniaBrian C.. 2010. “Negotiation.” Annual Review of Psychology61:491–515.
WallihanJames. 1998. “Negotiating to Avoid Agreement.” Negotiation Journal14:257–68.
45.
WeingartLaurie R.HyderElaine B.PrietulaMichael J.. 1996. “Knowledge Matters: The Effect of Tactical Descriptions on Negotiation Behavior and Outcome.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70:1205–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
