The goal of the current project is to integrate psychological research on emotion regulation with the study of democratic practices in general and political intolerance in particular. We hypothesized that the use of a well-established emotion regulation strategy, cognitive reappraisal, would be associated with lower levels of group-based negative emotions toward one’s least-liked group and lower levels of political intolerance toward that group. Preliminary data based on nationwide survey conducted among Jews in Israel show that the tendency to reappraise negative emotions during war is associated with more tolerant attitudes. In studies 1 and 2, we experimentally manipulated reappraisal, and this led to reduced levels of political intolerance toward Palestinian Citizens of Israel (study 1) and toward one’s least-liked group (study 2). These effects were transmitted via a decrease in negative emotions in both studies, as well as by an increase in support for general democratic values in Study 2.
AltemeyerB.1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel. 2009. Human Rights in Israel—Status Report 2009. [In Hebrew.] Israel: Tal Dahan.
4.
BahryD. L.BoazC.GordonS. B.. 1997. “Tolerance, Transition, and Support for Civil Liberties in Russia.”Comparative Political Studies30:484–510.
5.
Bar-TalD.RosenY.. 2009. “Peace Education in Societies Involved in Intractable Conflicts: Direct and Indirect Models.”Review of Educational Research79:557–75.
6.
BoboL.HutchingsV. L.. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.”American Sociological Review61:951–72.
7.
BrewerM.BrownR.. 1998. “Intergroup Relations.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., edited by GilbertD. T.Fiske, S. T.LindzeyG., 554–94. New York: McGraw-Hill.
CapelosT.Van TroostD.. 2007. “Reason Passion and Islam: The Impact of Anger and Fear on Political Tolerance.”Paper presented to the International Society of Political Psychology, Portland, OR.
10.
CoserL. A.1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press.
11.
de FigueiredoR. J. P. Jr.WeingastB. R.. 1999. “The Rationality of Fear.” In Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention, edited by Walter B. F.SnyderJ., 261–302. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
DruckmanJ.McDermottR.. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.”Political Behavior30 (3): 297–321.
13.
DuckittJ.1993. “Right-wing Authoritarianism among White South African Students: Its Measurement and Correlates.”The Journal of Social Psychology133:553–64.
14.
EisensteinM. A.2006. “Rethinking the Relationship between Religion and Political Tolerance in the U.S.”Political Behavior28:327–48.
15.
FrijdaN. H.2004. “Emotions and Action.” In Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium, edited by MansteadA. S. R.Frijda N.FischerA., 158–73. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.ter SchureL.. 1989. “Relations among Emotion, Appraisal and Action Tendency.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57:212–28.
17.
FunkeF.2005. “The Dimensionality of Right-wing Authoritarianism: Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement.”Political Psychology26:195–218.
18.
GibsonJ. L.2006. “Enigmas of Intolerance: Fifty Years after Stouffer’s Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties.”Perspectives on Politics4:21–34.
19.
GibsonJ. L.BinghamR. D.. 1982. “On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Political Tolerance.”The American Political Science Review76:603–20.
20.
GrossJ. J.1998. “The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review.”Review of General Psychology2:271–99.
21.
GrossJ. J.2002. “Emotion Regulation: Affective, Cognitive, and Social Consequences.”Psychophysiology39:281–91.
22.
GrossJ. J.2007. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P.. 2003. “Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-being.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85:348–62.
24.
HalperinE.Canetti-NisimD.Hirsch-HoeflerS.. 2009. “The Central Role of Group-based Hatred as an Emotional Antecedent of Political Intolerance: Evidence from Israel.”Political Psychology30 (1): 93–123.
25.
HalperinE.GrossJ. J.. 2011. “Intergroup Anger in Intractable Conflict: Long-term Sentiments Predict Anger Responses during the Gaza War.”Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14 (4): 477–488.
26.
HalperinE.RusselA. G.DweckC. S.GrossJ. J.. 2011. “Anger, Hatred, and the Quest for Peace: Anger can be Constructive in the Absence of Hatred.”Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (2): 274–91.
27.
HalperinE.PoratR.TamirM.GrossE.. 2013. “Can Emotion Regulation Change Political Attitudes in Intractable Conflict? From the Laboratory to the Field.”Psychological Science24 (1): 106–111.
28.
HayesA. F.2009. “Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millenium.”Communication Monographs76:408–20.
29.
HayesA. F. 2012. “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling [White paper].”Accessed October 14, 2012. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
30.
HewstoneM.GreenlandK.. 2000. “Intergroup Conflict.”International Journal of Psychology35:136–44.
KuklinskiJ. H.RiggleE.OttatiV.SchwarzN.Wyer, R. S.Jr. 1991. “The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Political Tolerance Judgments.”American Journal of Political Science35:1–27.
34.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R.. 2000. “Intergroup Emotions: Explaining Offensive Actions in an Intergroup Context.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79:602–16.
35.
MarcusG. E.SullivanJ. L.Theiss-MorseE.StevensD.. 2005. “The Emotional Foundation of Social Cognition: The Impact of Extrinsic Anxiety on the Formation of Political Tolerance Judgments.”Political Psychology26 (6): 949–63.
36.
MarcusG. E.SullivanJ. L.Theiss-MorseE.WoodS. L.. 1995. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PetersenR. D.2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-century Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F.. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.”Behavioral Research Methods40:879–91.
QuillianL.1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.”American Sociological Review60:586–611.
44.
RayR. D.WilhelmF. H.GrossJ. J.. 2008. “All in the mind’s Eye? Anger Rumination and Reappraisal.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94:133–45.
45.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J.. 2000. “Emotion Regulation and Memory: The Cognitive Costs of Keeping One’s Cool.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (3): 410–24.
46.
ShamirM.1991. “Political Intolerance among Masses and Elites in Israel: A Reevaluation of the Elitist Theory of Democracy.”The Journal of Politics53:1018–43.
47.
ShamirM.Sagiv-SchifterT.. 2006. “Conflict, Identity, and Tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa Intifada.”Political Psychology27 (4): 569–95.
48.
ShamirM.SullivanJ. L.. 1985. “Jews and Arabs in Israel: Everybody Hates Somebody, Sometime.”Journal of Conflict Resolution29:283–305.
49.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE.. 2004. “Political Tolerance and Coming to Psychological Closure Following the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks: An Integrative Approach.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30:743–56.
50.
SmithE. R.SegerC. R.MackieD. M.. 2007. “Can Emotions Be Truly Group Level? Evidence for Four Conceptual Criteria.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93:431–46.
51.
SmoohaS.2002. “The Model of Ethnic Democracy: Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State.”Nations and Nationalism8:475–503.
52.
SnyderJ. L.2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.
53.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T.. 2005. “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments are often More Effective than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89:845–51.
StoufferS. (1955) 1992. Communism, Conformity & Civil Liberties: A Cross-section of the Nation Speaks its Mind. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
56.
SullivanJ. L.MarcusG. E.FeldmanS.PieresonJ. E.. 1981. “The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis.”The American Political Science Review75 (1): 92–106.
57.
SullivanJ. L.PieresonJ.MarcusG. E.. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
SullivanJ. L.ShamirM.WalshP.RobertsN. S.. 1985. Political Tolerance in Context: Support for Unpopular Minorities in Israel, New Zealand, and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59.
SullivanJ. L.TransueJ. E.. 1999. “The Psychological Underpinning of Democracy: A Selective Review of Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust and Social Capital.”Annual Review of Psychology50:625–50.
60.
SullivanJ. L.WalshP.ShamirM.BarnumD. G.GibsonJ. L.. 1993. “Why Politicians are Moretolerant: Selective Recruitment and Socialization among Political Elites in Britain, Israel, New Zealand and the United States.”British Journal of Political Science23:51–76.
61.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S.. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
62.
TajfelH.1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WilkinsonS. I.2006. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
64.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R.KlarY.. 2006. “Collective Guilt: Emotional Reactions When One’s Group Has Done Wrong or Been Wronged.”European Review of Social Psychology17:1–37.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
