This article examines the relationship between regime type and decision makers’ tendency to make suboptimal choices in international crises. To test hypotheses on the optimality of democratic foreign policy, the author uses a novel statistical measure of suboptimality in foreign policy behavior. This estimator builds on Signorino’s statistical strategic models to allow for actor-level variation in deviations from optimal behavior in a strategic setting. An analysis of the international disputes from 1919 to 1999 shows that democratic leaders have a greater tendency to choose policies not optimal for their citizens than do nondemocratic leaders.
BasMuhammet A.2011. “Measuring Uncertainty in International Relations: Heteroskedastic Strategic Models.” Working Paper, Department of Government, HarvardUniversity.
2.
BasMuhammet A.SignorinoCurtis S.WalkerRobert W.. 2008. “Statistical Back-wards Induction: A Simple Method for Estimating Recursive Strategic Models.”Political Analysis16 (1): 21–40.
3.
BennettD. ScottRupertMatthew C.. 2003. “Comparing Measures of Political Similarity: An Empirical Comparison of S Versus Tau-B in the Study of International Conflict.”Journal of Conflict Resolution47:367.
4.
BennettD. ScottStamAllan C.. 1996. “The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816, 1985.”American Political Science Review90:239–57.
5.
BennettD. ScottStamAllan C.. 2000a. “A Universal Test of an Expected Utility Theory of War.”International Studies Quarterly44:451–80.
6.
BennettD. ScottStamAllan. 2000b. “EUGene: A Conceptual Manual.”International Interactions26:179–204.
7.
BremerStuart A.1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965.”Journal of Conflict Resolution36:309.
8.
Bueno de MesquitaBruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceMorrowJamesSiversonRandolphSmithAlastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.”American Political Science Review93 (4): 791–808.
10.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolph M.MorrowJames D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
CaplanBryan. 2007. The Myth of Rational Voter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansHenk. 2003. “Peace through Insecurity: Tenure and International Conflict.”Journal of Political Economy47:443–67.
13.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansHenk. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?”American Journal of Political Science48:604–19.
14.
ClarkDavidNordstromTimothy. 2005. “Democratic Variants and Domestic Variance: How Domestic Constraints Shape Interstate Conflict.”Journal of Politics67:250–70.
15.
ClarkDavidNordstromTimothyReedWilliam. 2008. “Substitution Is in the Variance: Resources and Foreign Policy Choice.”American Journal of Political Science52:763–73.
16.
de TocquevilleAlexis. 1988. Democracy in America. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
17.
DownsGeorge W.RockeDavid M.. 1994. “Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War.”American Journal of Political Science38:362–80.
18.
FarberDavid. 2005. Taken Hostage: The Iran Hostage Crisis and America’s First Encounter with Radical Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Crises.”American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–92.
20.
GartnerScott. 1993. “Predicting the Timing of Carter’s Decision to Initiate a Hostage Rescue Attempt: Modeling a Dynamic Information Environment.”International Interactions18:365–86.
21.
GartzkeErikGleditschKristian S.. 2004. “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies.”American Journal of Political Science48:775–95.
22.
GhosnFatenBennettScott. 2003. “Codebook for the Dyadic Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, Version 3.10.”Available athttp://correlatesofwar.org.
23.
GoemansHein. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
GoemansHein. 2008. “Which Way Out? The Manner and Consequences of Losing Office.”Journal of Conflict Resolution53:771–94.
25.
GoemansHeinFeyMark. 2009. “Risky but Rational: War as an Institutionally Induced Gamble.”Journal of Politics71:35–54.
HamiltonAlexanderMadisonJamesJayJohn. 1961. “Federalist No. 70: The Executive Department Further Considered.” In The Federalist Papers, edited by Rossiter, 219–28Clinton. New York: New American Library.
28.
HorowitzMichael C.McDermottRoseStamAllan C.. 2005. “Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations.”Journal of Conflict Resolution49:661–85.
29.
HoughtonDavid P.2001. US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HuthPaulAlleeTodd. 2002. “Domestic Political Accountability and the Escalation and Settlement of International Disputes.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46:754–90.
KennanGeorge. 1950. American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2001a. “Explaining Rare Events in International Relations.”International Organization55:693–715.
34.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2001b. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.”Political Analysis9:137–63.
35.
LevyJack S. 1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” In Handbook of War Studies, edited by Midlarsky, 259–88Manus I.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
MansfieldEdwardSnyderJack. 1995. “Democratization and the Danger of War.”International Security20 (1):5–38.
37.
MansfieldEdwardSnyderJack. 2002. “Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War.”International Organization56 (2):297–337.
38.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2007. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2006.” http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2006.pdf
39.
McDermottRose. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
NarangVipinNelsonRebecca. 2009. “Who Are These Belligerent Democratizers? Reassessing the Impact of Democratization on War.”International Organization63:357–79.
41.
PotterPhillip B. K.2007. “Does Experience Matter? American Presidential Experience, Age, and International Conflict.”Journal of Conflict Resolution51:351–78.
42.
PowellRobert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
RousseauDavidGelpiChristopherReiterDanHuthPaul K.. 1996. “Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-1988.”American Political Science Review90 (3): 512–33.
44.
SchultzKenneth. 1999. “Do Domestic Institutions Constrain or Inform?: Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.”International Organization53 (3): 233–66.
45.
SickGary. 1986. All Fall Down: America’s Tragic Encounter with Iran. New York: Penguin Books.
46.
SignorinoCurtis S.1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict.”American Political Science Review93 (2): 279–97.
47.
SignorinoCurtis S.RitterJeffrey M.. 1999. “Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.”International Studies Quarterly43:115–44.
48.
SignorinoCurtis S.YilmazKuzey. 2003. “Strategic Misspecification in Regression Models.”American Journal of Political Science47 (3): 551–66.
49.
SmithAlastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.”American Political Science Review92 (3): 577–92.
50.
TomzMichael. 2007. “Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach.”International Organization61:821–40.
51.
TuchmanBarbara. 1984. The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Ballantine Books.
52.
WaltzKenneth. 1967. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little, Brown.
53.
WardMichaelGleditschKristian. 1998. “Democratizing for Peace.”American Political Science Review92 (1): 51–61.
54.
WittmanDonald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
