Many scholars assume that nationalism is inherently aggressive without systematically exploring the relationship between nationalism and interstate war initiation. Thus, many questions are unanswered. Does nationalism increase the risk of war and if so, how? Which types of nationalism are most likely to trigger warfare? The author argues that nationalist persuasion campaigns produce several mechanisms that encourage conflict. Nationalism provokes “national enemies” and their foreign allies, generates biased strategic assumptions, creates domestic interest groups that favor war, permits the suppression of opposition groups, and promotes “nationalist bidding wars.” When these processes exist, nationalism should increase the probability of war initiation. But, different forms of nationalism may not have similar effects. Using original data on the existence and type of state-level nationalism from 1816 to 1997, the author finds that nationalism significantly increases the probability of interstate war initiation. However, not all forms of nationalism are created equal in this regard.
AndersonBenedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. New York: Verso.
2.
BalfourSebastianQuirogaAlejandro. 2007. The Reinvention of Spain: Nation and Identity Since Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BennettD. ScottStamAllan. 2000. “EUGene: A Conceptual Manual.”International Interactions26:179–204. http://eugenesoftware.org.
4.
BenzWolfgang. 2006. A Concise History of the Third Reich, trans. DunlapThomas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BlackbournDavid. 2003. History of Germany 1780-1918. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
BlomJ. C. H.1998. “The Netherlands since 1830.” In History of the Low Countries, edited by. BlomJ. C. H.LambertsE., 393–470. New York: Berghahn Books.
7.
BreuillyJohn. 1993. Nationalism and the State. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
8.
BrownDavid. 1999. “Are There Good and Bad Nationalisms?”Nations and Nationalism5 (2): 281–302.
9.
Bueno deMesquitaAlastair SmithBruce,SiversonRandolphMorrowJames. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
CedermanLars-Erik. 2002. “Nationalism and Ethnicity.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by CarlsnaesWalterRisse, ThomasSimmonsBeth, 409–28. London: SAGE.
11.
CookBernard. 2002. Belgium: A History. New York: Peter Lang.
12.
DiehlPaulGoertzGary. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
13.
FeuchtwangerEdgar. 2001. Imperial Germany, 1850-1918. New York: Routledge.
14.
FousekJohn. 2000. To Lead the Free World: American Nationalism and the Cultural Roots of the Cold War. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
15.
GagnonV. P.1994. “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict.”International Security19 (3): 130–66.
16.
GellnerErnest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
GreenfeldLiah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
HarrisErika. 2009. Nationalism: Theories and Cases. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
19.
HechterMichael. 2000. Containing Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
HixsonWalter. 2008. The Myth of American Diplomacy: National Identity and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
HobsbawmEric. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HookerMark. 1999. The History of Holland. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
23.
KedourieElie, ed. 1971. Nationalism in Asia and Africa. New York: World Publishing Company.
LambertsE.1998. “Belgium since 1830.” In History of the Low Countries, edited by. BlomJ. C. H.LambertsE., 319–91. New York: Berghahn Books.
28.
LemkeDouglasReedWilliam. 2001. “The Relevance of Politically Relevant Dyads.”Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (1): 126–44.
29.
LermanKatherine Anne. 2008. “Bismarckian Germany.” In Imperial Germany, 1871-1918, edited by RetallackJames, 18–39. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
LievenAnatol. 2004. America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
MansfieldEdwardSnyderJack. 2005. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2009. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2007. Dataset Users’ Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. Dataset version p4v2007. www.systemicpeace.org.
33.
McCartneyPaul. 2002. “The Bush Doctrine and American Nationalism.”Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28–September 1, 2002. Accessed May 27, 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65633_index.html.
34.
McHaleVincent. 1983. Political Parties in Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
35.
MelanderErik. 2001. “The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Revisited: Was the War Inevitable?”Journal of Cold War Studies3 (2): 48–75.
36.
NairnTom. 1981. The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neonationalism. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
37.
PavkovićAleksandar. 2000. The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia: Nationalism and War in the Balkans. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
38.
PeiMinxin. 2003. “The Paradoxes of American Nationalism.”Foreign Policy136:31–37.
39.
PosenBarry R.1993. “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power.”International Security18 (2): 80–124.
40.
QuirogaAlejandro. 2007. Making Spaniards: Primo de Rivera and the Nationalization of the Masses, 1923-30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
ReiterDanStamAllan. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
RoegiersJ.van SasN. C. F.. 1998. “Revolution in the North and South, 1780-1830.” In History of the Low Countries, edited by BlomJ. C. H.LambertsE., 275–318. New York: Berghahn Books.
43.
RutlandPeter. 1994. “Democracy and Nationalism in Armenia.”Europe-Asia Studies46 (5): 839–61.
44.
SaidemanStephenWilliam AyresR.. 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
SarDesaiD. R.1992. Vietnam: The Struggle for National Identity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46.
SarDesaiD. R.2005. Vietnam: Past and Present. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
SarkeesMeredith Reid. 2000. “The Correlates of War Data on War: An Update to 1997.”Conflict Management and Peace Science18 (1): 123–44.
48.
SlantchevBranislav. 2004. “How Initiators End Their Wars: The Duration of Warfare and the Terms of Peace.”American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 813–29.
49.
SmithAnthony. 2001. Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
50.
SmithAnthony. 2004. The Antiquity of Nations. Malden, MA: Polity.
51.
SnyderJack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. Norton.
52.
SnyderLouis. 1976. Varieties of Nationalism: A Comparative Study. New York: The Dryden Press.
53.
SnyderLouis. 1990. Encyclopedia of Nationalism. New York: Paragon House.
54.
StinnettDouglasTirJaroslavSchaferPhilipDiehlPaulGochmanCharles. 2002. “The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.”Conflict Management and Peace Science19 (2): 58–66.
55.
SunyRonald. 1997. “The Russian Empire.” In After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-Building: The Soviet Union and the Russian, Ottoman, and Habsburg Empire, edited by BarkeyKarenHagenMark von, 142–54. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.
TomzMichaelKingGaryZengLangche. 1999. RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, Version 1.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, October 1. http://gking.harvard.edu/.
57.
Van EveraStephen. 1994. “Hypotheses on Nationalism and War.”International Security18 (4): 5–39.
58.
VosLouis. 1998. “The Flemish National Question.” In Nationalism in Belgium: Shifting Identities, 1780-1995, edited by DeprezKasVosLouis, 83–95. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
59.
WoodwellDouglas. 2007. Nationalism in International Relations: Norms, Foreign Policy, and Enmity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
YackBernard. 1999. “The Myth of the Civic Nation.” In Theorizing Nationalism, edited by BeinerRonald, 103–18. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
