Does a state’s past win/loss record affect its subsequent choices of peaceful dispute resolution methods in territorial disputes? We present a theory that portrays attempts at peaceful resolution as a strategic process, by which states search for the most favorable forum. During the process of decision making, a state strategically chooses between several methods of peaceful resolution; its final choice is based on the state’s past experience with this particular method. Empirical analysis of all attempts at peaceful resolution of territorial disputes from 1945 to 2003 shows that challenger states use their own record of victories and failures, as well as the win/ loss record of the target as indicators of the probability of winning in a subsequent dispute. This pattern is especially strong for the binding third-party methods, arbitration, and adjudication.
Allee, Todd L., and Paul K. Huth .2006. The Pursuit of legal settlements to territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science23 (4): 285-307.
4.
Alvarez, José E.2005. International organizations as law-makers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Baratta, Joseph Preston.1989. International arbitration: Improving its role in dispute settlement. Washington, DC: Center for UN Reform Education.
6.
Bercovitch, Jacob.1999. International conflict management 1945-1995 dataset. http://www.posc.canterbury.ac.nz/jbercovitch/mediation.html (accessed November 20, 2007).
7.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Jeffrey Z. Rubin .1992. Mediation in international relations: Multiple approaches to conflict management. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
8.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Gerald Schneider .2000. Who mediates? The political economy of international conflict management. Journal of Peace Research37 (2): 145-65.
9.
Bernama News Agency.2002. Malaysia to focus on island dispute with Singapore, says deputy premier. December 18.
10.
Black, Henry Campbell, Joseph R. Nolan, and Michael J. Connolly .1979. Black’s law dictionary . Eagen, MN: West Publishing Company .
11.
Brown, Chester.2007. A common law of international adjudication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Cassese, Antonio.2005. International law. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press .
13.
Central Intelligence Agency.2008. CIA world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html (accessed April 2010).
14.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Ajin Choi.2003. Guess who did what: political leaders and the management of territorial disputes, 1950-1990. Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (3): 251-78.
15.
Day, Alan J.1987. Border and territorial disputes. 2nd ed. Essex, England: Longman Press .
16.
Dixon, William.1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict . Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (1): 42-68.
17.
Downing, David.1980. An Atlas of territorial and border disputes. London: New English Library.
18.
Fiss, Owen M.1979. Foreword: The forms of justice. Harvard Law Review93: 1-58.
19.
Franck, Thomas.1995. Fairness in international law and institutions. New York: Clarendon Press.
20.
Frazier, Derrick V.2006. Third party characteristics, territory and the mediation of militarized interstate disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science23 (4): 267-84.
21.
Gamble, John King Jr. , and Dana D. Fischer.1976. The International court of justice: An analysis of a failure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22.
Glenn, Patrick H.2007. Legal traditions of the world: Sustainable diversity in law. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Gent, Stephen, and Megan Shannon.2008. Choosing the ties that bind: decision control and the pursuit of binding conflict management. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , August, Boston, MA.
24.
Hansen, Holley, Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Stephen C. Nemeth .2008. IO mediation of interstate conflicts: moving beyond the global vs. regional dichotomy. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2): 295-325.
25.
Hensel, Paul R.1999. Charting a course to conflict: territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816-1992. In The road map to war, ed. Paul Diehl, 115-46. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
26.
---. 2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly45 (1): 81-109.
27.
---. 2005. Multilateral treaties of pacific settlement (MTOPS) data set, version 1. http://data.icow.org (accessed September 2007).
28.
Hensel, Paul R., Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Thomas E. Sowers II , and Clayton L. Thyne.2008. Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (1): 117-43.
29.
Huth, Paul K.1996. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
30.
Huth, Paul K., and Todd L. Allee.2002. The Democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
International Boundary Research Unit.2007 . Boundary News Archive. www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/ (accessed September 2007).
32.
Irani, George E, and Nathan C. Funk.1998. Rituals of reconciliation: Arab-Islamic perspectives. Arab Studies Quarterly20 (4): 53-73.
33.
James, Patrick, Johann Park, and Seung-Whan Choi .2006. Democracy and conflict management: territorial claims in the western hemisphere revisited. International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 803-17.
34.
Jervis, Robert.1976. Perception and misperception in international politics . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35.
Jones, Daniel, Stuart Bremer, and J. David Singer .1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15 (2): 163-213.
36.
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Päivi Leino .2002. Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law15 (3): 553-79.
37.
Kratochwil, Friedrich.1985. Peace and disputed territory. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
38.
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Andrew G. Long, Michaela Mattes, Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Jeffrey M. Ritter, and Burcu Savun.2005. Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions (ATOP). http://atop.rice.edu/ (accessed September 2007).
39.
Lim, Lydia.2003. Pedra Branca: key step forward today; Singapore and Malaysia will sign an accord in KL to refer the dispute over the island to International Court of Justice. The Straits Times, February 6.
40.
Merrills, J.G.2005. International dispute settlement. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin.2002. A Kantian system? Democracy and third party conflict resolution . American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 749-59.
42.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Emilia Justyna Powell.2011. Domestic law goes global: Legal traditions and international courts. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
43.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Kelly M. Kadera, and Mark J.C. Crescenzi.2008. Practicing democratic community norms: third party conflict management and successful settlements. In International conflict mediation: new approaches and findings, ed. J. Bercovitch and S. S. Gartner, 243-64. New York: Routledge.
44.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Paul R. Hensel .2007. International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science51 (4):721-737.
45.
People’s Daily (China).2006. ECOWAS intervenes in Benin-Burkina Faso border dispute. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200601/31/eng20060131_239443.html (accessed April 9, 2010).
46.
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Krista E. Wiegand .2010. Legal systems and the peaceful resolution of territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (2): 129-51.
47.
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell.2007. The International Court of Justice and the world’s three legal systems. Journal of Politics69 (2): 397-415.
48.
Raymond, Gregory A.1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries . Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (1): 24-42.
49.
Rosenne, Shabtai.1985. The Law and practice of the International Court. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
50.
Shannon, Megan.2009. Preventing war and providing the peace? International organizations and the management of territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science26 (2): 144-63.
51.
Shany, Yuval.2003. The Competing jurisdictions of international courts and tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Shapiro, Martin.1981. Courts: a comparative and political analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Shaw, Malcolm.2003. International law. 5th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Simmons, Beth A.1999. See you in ‘court’? The appeal to quasi-judicial legal processes in the settlement of territorial disputes. In A Roadmap to war: territorial dimensions of international conflict, ed. P. F. Diehl, 205-37. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
55.
---. 2002. Capacity, commitment and compliance: International law and the settlement of territorial disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (6): 829-56.
56.
Stuyt, A.M.1990. Survey of international arbitrations, 1794-1989. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
57.
United Nations Department of Public Information, News and Media Division.2006. Nigeria, Cameroon sign agreement ending decades-old border dispute; sets procedures for Nigerian withdrawal from Bakassai Peninsula. Press Release AFR/1397, June 12.
58.
United Nations Secretary General Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations.2006. Agreement between the Republic of Cameroon and the Federal Republic of Nigeria concerning the modalities of withdrawal and transfer of authority in the Bakassi Peninsula. June 12. http://www.un.org/unowa/cnmc/preleas/cn_agreement.pdf (accessed April 10, 2010).
59.
U.S. Department of State Bulletin.1986. Secretary’s letter to UN Secretary General, October 7, 1985.
60.
Von Glahn, Gerhard, and James Larry Taulbee .2007. Law among nations. An introduction to public international law. New York: Pearson Longman.
61.
Wiegand, Krista E.2010a. Bahrain, Qatar, and the Hawar Islands: resolution of a Gulf territorial dispute. Middle East Politics, forthcoming.
62.
---. 2010b. Enduring territorial disputes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , Washington, DC, September.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
