This study investigates how an individual’s social value orientation (SVO) interacts with explicit cooperative incentives on one hand, and intrinsic and extraneously induced trust on the other hand, to affect cooperative behavior. In three experiments, subjects (n = 322) played a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma (PD; with weak cooperative incentives) and an assurance game (AG; with strong cooperative incentives) in conditions with or without trust signals. The authors found, as expected, that cooperative behavior is strongly spurred by explicit incentives, but not by trust, among people with a proself value orientation. Conversely, trust is very important to enhance cooperative behavior of participants with a prosocial value orientation, whereas explicit incentives are less important compared to proselfs. The authors conclude that this study reveals two fundamentally different logics of cooperative behavior: one based on extrinsic incentives and the other on trust.
Acevedo, Melissa, and Joachim I. Krueger .2005. Evidential reasoning in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. American Journal of Psychology118:431-57.
2.
Au, Wing-Tung, and Jessica Y. Y. Kwong.2004. Measurement and effects of social value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas, ed. R. Suleiman, D. Budescu, I. Fischer, and D. Messick , 71-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Ballinger, Gary A.2004. Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods7:127-50.
4.
Barrett, H. Clark, and Robert Kurzban.2006. Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review113:628-47.
5.
Boone, Christophe, Carolyn H. Declerck, and Sigrid Suetens.2008. Subtle social cues, explicit incentives, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior29:179-88.
6.
Bogaert, Sandy, Christophe Boone, and Carolyn H. Declerck .2008. Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology47:452-80.
7.
Bohnet, Iris, and Bruno S. Frey.1999. The sound of silence in Prisoner’s Dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization38:43-57.
8.
Bornstein, Gary.2003. Intergroup conflict: Individual, group, and collective interests. Personality and Social Psychology Review7:129-45.
9.
Bornstein, Gary, and Zohar Gilula.2003. Between-group communication and conflict resolution in assurance and chicken games. The Journal of Conflict Resolution47:326-39.
10.
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Roderick M. Kramer .1986. Choice behavior in social dilemmas. Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:543-49.
11.
Burnham, Terence, Kevin McCabe, and Vernon L. Smith.2000. Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization43:57-73.
12.
Camerer, Colin F., and Mark Knez.2000. Increasing cooperation in Prisoner’s Dilemma by establishing a precedent of efficiency coordination in games. Social Science Working Paper 1080. Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences . California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
13.
Colman, Andrew M.2003. Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences26:139-98.
14.
Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby.1992. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange . In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby , 163-227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Dawes, Robyn M., and David M. Messick.2000. Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology35:111-6.
16.
Declerck, Carolyn H., Toko Kyonari, and Christophe Boone.2009. Why do responders reject unequal offers in the Ultimatum Game? An experimental study on the role of perceiving interdependence. Journal of Economic Psychology30:335-43.
17.
De Cremer, David, Daan van Knippenberg, Eric van Dijk, and Esther van Leeuwen .2008. Cooperating if one’s goals are collective-based. Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology38:1562-79.
18.
De Cremer, David, and Paul A.M. Van Lange.2001. Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality15:S5-18.
19.
De Cremer, David, and Mark Van Vugt.1999. Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology29:871-93.
20.
Gintis, Herbert, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, and Ernst Fehr.2003. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans . Evolution and Human Behavior24:153-72.
21.
Haley, Kevin J., and Daniel M.T. Fessler.2005. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in anonymous economic games. Evolution and Human Behavior26:245-56.
22.
Huber, Peter J.1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics, and Probability, ed. L. M. Le Cam and J. Neyman , 221-33. Berkeley : University of California Press.
23.
Kelley, Harold H., John G. Holmes, Norbert L. Kerr, Harry T. Reis, Caryl E. Rusbult, and Paul A. M. Van Lange .2003. An atlas of interpersonal situations, 177-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Kelley, Harold H., and John W. Thibaut.1978. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
25.
Kiesler, Sara, Lee Sproull, and Keith Waters.1996. A prisoner’s dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology29:1123-34.
26.
Kiyonari, Toko, Shigehito Tanida, and Toshio Yamagishi .2000. Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior21:411-27.
27.
Kollock, Peter.1998. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology24:183-214.
28.
Komorita, Samuel S., Craig D. and Parks.1996. Social dilemmas. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29.
Kosugi, Motoko, and Toshio Yamagishi .1998. Generalized trust and judgments of trustworthiness. The Japanese Journal of Psychology69:349-57.
30.
Kurzban, Robert, and Daniel Houser.2001. Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality15:S37-52.
31.
---. 2005. Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: A compliment to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102:1803-7.
32.
Liang, Kung-Yee, and Scott L. Zeger.1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika73:13-22.
33.
Liebrand, Wim B. G., Ronald W.T.L. Jansen, Victor M. Rijken, and Cor J. M. Suhre .1986. Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology22:203-15.
34.
Lu, Luo, and Michael Argyle1991. Happiness and cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences12:1019-30.
35.
Messick, David, and Charles G. McClintock .1968. Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology4:1-25.
36.
Piazza, Jared, and Jesse M. Bering.2008. Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocation in an economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior29:172-8.
37.
Pruitt, Dean G., and Melvin J. Kimmel.1977. 20 years of experimental gaming-Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology28:363-92.
38.
Rotter, Julian B.1967. A new scale for measurement of interpersonal trust . Journal of Personality35:651-5.
39.
---. 1971. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist26:443-52.
40.
Simpson, Brent.2004. Social values, subjective transformations, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly67:385-95.
41.
---. 2006. Social identity and cooperation in social dilemmas . Rationality and Society18:443-70.
42.
Skyrms, Brian2004. The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Smeesters, Dirk, Luk Warlop, Eddy Van Avermaet, Olivier Corneille, and Vincent Yzerbyt .2003. Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84:972-87.
44.
Stouten, Jeroen, David De Cremer, and Eric Van Dijk.2005. All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology35:767-83.
45.
Van Lange, Paul A.M.1992. Confidence in expectations. A test of the triangle hypothesis . European Journal of Personality6:371-9.
46.
Van Lange, Paul A.M.1999. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77:337-49.
47.
Van Lange, Paul A.M.2000. Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. In European review of social psychology , vol. 11, ed. W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone , 297-331. New York: Wiley.
48.
Van Lange, Paul A.M., and D. Michael Kuhlman .1994. Social value orientations and impressions of partner honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67:126-41.
49.
Van Lange, Paul A.M., Wilma Otten, Ellen M.N. De Bruin, and Jeffrey A. Joireman .1997. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73:733-46.
50.
Van Lange, Paul A.M., and Astrid Semin-Goossens.1998. The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology28:847-54.
51.
Van Vugt, Mark, David De Cremer, and Dirk P. Janssen.2007. Gender differences in cooperation and competition. The male warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science18:19-23.
52.
Weber Mark J., and J. Keith Murnighan .2008. Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95:1340-53.
53.
White, Halbert.1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models . Econometrica50:1-25.
54.
Wilson, David S., David C. Near, and Ralph R. Miller.1998. Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior19:203-12.
55.
Yamagishi, Toshio.1998. The structure of trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
56.
Yamagishi, Toshio, Satoshi Kanazawa, Rie Mashima, and Shigeru Terai.2005. Separating trust from cooperation in a dynamic relationship. Rationality and Society17:275-308.
57.
Yamagishi, Toshio, and Kaori Sato.1986. Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:67-73.
58.
Yamagishi, Toshio, Shigeru Terai, Toko Kiyonari, Nobuhiro Mifune, and Satoshi Kanazawa .2007. The social exchange heuristic: Managing errors in social exchange. Rationality and Society19:259-91.
59.
Zorn, Christopher J. W.2001. Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science45:470-90.
