de Sombre, Elizabeth.2007. The global environment and world politics. New York: Continuum.
2.
Downs, George, David Rocke, and Peter Barsoom.1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization50 (3): 379-406.
3.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
4.
Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter, eds. 2000. Legalization and world politics. International Organization54 (3): 385-99.
5.
Keohane, Robert.1984. After hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, eds. 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization55 (4): 761-99.
7.
Maoz, Zeev, Lesley G. Terris, Ranan D. Kuperman, and Ilan Talmud.2004. International relations: A network approach . In New directions in international relations, ed. Alex Mintz and Bruce Russett , 35-64. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
8.
Mitchell, Ronald.2006. Problem structure, institutional design, and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Global Environmental Politics6 (3): 72-89.
9.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York : W. W. Norton.
10.
Simmons, Beth, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett .2006. Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization60 (4): 781-810.
11.
von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. American Political Science Review99 (4): 611-22.
12.
Ward, Hugh.2006. International linkages and environmental sustainability: The effectiveness of the regime network. Journal of Peace Research43 (2): 149-66.
13.
Ward, Michael, and Kristian Gleditsch .2002. Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis10 (3): 244-60.
