The authors use network analysis to argue that the main contribution of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) to international stability is not necessarily their direct and individual impact, because generally IGOs are institutionally weak. Rather, membership of IGOs creates network ties between states, allowing them, either individually or collectively, to intervene more effectively in latent conflicts. The IGO network also provides direct and indirect communication channels, where indirect links can act as partial substitutes for direct diplomatic ties. Empirically, the authors apply these ideas to the extensive network of international linkages created in the post—World War II period. They demonstrate that indirect links do indeed matter and that they substitute for more direct diplomatic ties. Furthermore, these effects are not limited to ties created by IGOs with specific security functions.
Alger, Chadwick F., and Steven J. Brams .1967. Patterns of representation in national capitals and international organizations. World Politics19 (4): 646-63.
2.
Austen-Smith, David.1992. Strategic models of talk in political decision making . International Political Science Review13 (1): 45-58.
3.
Beardsley, Kyle.2005. Not all mediators are created equal: Choosing who mediates . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC , September.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker.1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-88.
5.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam.2003. EUGene. Expected Utility Generation and Data Management Program, version 3.03. Computer program. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, State College.
6.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Gerald Schneider .2000. Who mediates? The political economy of international conflict management. Journal of Peace Research37 (2): 145-65.
7.
Boehmer, Charles, Erik Gartzke, and Timothy Nordstrom .2004. Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics57 (1): 1-38.
8.
Bonacich, Phillip.1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Sociological Review92 (4): 1170-82.
9.
Borgatti, Steven P., Michael G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman .2002. UCINET for Windows 6: Software for social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, Analytic Technologies.
10.
Brams, Steven J.1966. Transactions flows in the international system. American Political Science Review60 (1): 880-98.
11.
Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell, Robert A. Kann, Maurice Lee Jr. , Martin Lichterman, Raymond E. Lindgren, Francis L. Loewenheim, and Richard W. Van Wagenen.1968. Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Dorussen, Han.2006. Heterogeneous trade interests and conflict: What you trade matters. Journal of Conflict Resolution50:87-107.
13.
Dorussen, Han, and Hugh Ward.2007. Trade links and the Kantian peace. Presented at the sixty-fifth annual national conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12-15.
14.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
15.
Ford, Lester R., and Delbert R. Fulkerson .1956. Maximal flow through a network . Canadian Journal of Mathematics8:399-404.
16.
Freeman, Linton C.1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification . Social Networks1 (2): 215-39.
17.
Freeman, Linton C., Stephen P. Borgatti, and Douglas R. White .1991. Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks13:141-54.
18.
Gartzke, Erik, and Dong-Joon Jo .2002. United Nations General Assembly voting, 1946-1996. Version 3.0. http://www.columbia.edu/∼eg589/datasets (accessed July 3, 2007).
19.
Gleditsch, Kristian S.2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46:712-24.
20.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Alexander Montgomery .2008. Power or plenty: How do international trade institutions affect economic sanctions? Journal of Conflict Resolution52:213-242.
21.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Alexander H. Montgomery .2006. Power positions: International organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution50:3-27.
22.
Hansen, Holley, Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Stephen Nemeth.2008. IO mediation of interstate conflicts: Moving beyond the global vs. regional dichotomy. Journal of Conflict Resolution52:295-325.
23.
Hensel, Paul R.2003. ICOW Multilateral Treaties of Pacific Settlement data set version 1.3. http://data.icow.org.
24.
Hinsley, Francis H.1963. Power and the pursuit of peace: Theory and practice in the history of relations between states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Ingram, Paul, Jeffrey Robinson, and Marc L. Busch .2005. The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology111 (3): 824-58.
26.
Jacobson, Harold K.1984. Networks of interdependence: International organisations and the global political system. 2d ed. New York: Knopf.
27.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr .1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-82.
28.
Keesing's.2002. Reduction of tension with Pakistan. Keesing's Record of World Events48 (June): 44841.
29.
Kydd, Andrew.2006. When can mediators build trust?American Political Science Review100 (3): 449-62.
30.
Lee, Sung-Chull, Robert G. Muncaster, and Dina A. Zinnes .1994. The friend of my enemy is my enemy: Modeling triadic inter-nation relationships. Synthese100 (3): 333-58.
31.
Mansfield, Edward, and Jon Pevehouse .2008. Democratization and the varieties of international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution52:269-294
32.
Maoz, Zeev, Lesley G. Terris, Ranan D. Kuperman, and Ilan Talmud.2004. International relations: A network approach . In New directions in international relations, ed. Alex Mintz and Bruce Russett.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
33.
———. 2006. Network centrality and international conflict, 1816-2003: Does it pay to be important? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Peace Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI, November.
34.
———. 2007. What is the enemy of my enemy? Causes and consequences of imbalanced international relations, 1816-2001. Journal of Politics69 (1): 100-15.
35.
Mearsheimer, John J.1994-1995. The false promise of international institutions . International Security19 (3): 5-49.
36.
Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett, and Michael L. Berbaum .2003. Causes of peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. International Studies Quarterly47 (3): 371-93.
37.
Pevehouse, Jon, and Bruce Russett.2006. Democratic international governmental organizations promote peace. International Organization60 (4): 969-1000.
38.
Pevehouse, Jon C., Tim Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke.2003. Intergovernmental organizations, 1815-2000 . A new Correlates of War data set (2.1). http://cow2.1a.psu.edu/.
39.
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
40.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York : Norton.
41.
Russett, Bruce, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis .1998. The third leg of the Kantian tripod for peace: International organizations and militarized disputes, 1950-85 . International Organization52 (3): 441-67.
42.
Signorino, Curtis S., and Jeffrey M. Ritter .1999. Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43 (1): 115-44.
43.
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey.1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war, and numbers , ed. Bruce Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Terris, Leslie, and Zeev Maoz.2005. Rational mediation: A theory and a test . Journal of Peace Research42 (5): 563-83.
45.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King.2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/stats.shtml#clarify.
46.
von Stein, Jana. 2008. The international law and politics of climate change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Conflict Resolution52:243-268
47.
Wallace, Michael, and J. David Singer .1970. Intergovernmental organization in the global system, 1815-1964: A quantitative description. International Organization24 (2): 239-87.
48.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
Ward, Hugh.2006. International linkages and environmental sustainability: The effectiveness of the regime network. Journal of Peace Research43 (2): 149-66.
50.
Ward, Michael D., Randolph M. Siversen, and Xun Cao .2007. Disputes, democracies, and dependencies: A reexamination of the Kantian peace. American Journal of Political Science51 (3): 583-601.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
