In the spirit of Lewis Richardson’s original study of the statistics of deadly conflicts, we study the frequency and severity of terrorist attacks worldwide since 1968. We show that these events are uniformly characterized by the phenomenon of “scale invariance,” that is, the frequency scales as an inverse power of the severity, P(x) Αx-α. We find that this property is a robust feature of terrorism, persisting when we control for economic development of the target country, the type of weapon used, and even for short time scales. Further, we show that the center of the distribution oscillates slightly with a period of roughly τ≈ 13 years, that there exist significant temporal correlations in the frequency of severe events, and that current models of event incidence cannot account for these variations or the scale invariance property of global terrorism. Finally, we describe a simple toy model for the generation of these statistics and briefly discuss its implications.
Arce, M., Daniel G., and Todd Sandler. 2005. Counterterrorism: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (1): 138-200.
2.
Bak, Per, and Chao Tang. 1989. Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomena. Journal of Geophysical Research94 (B11): 15635-15637.
3.
Bak, Per, Chao Tang, and Kurt Wiesenfeld. 1987. Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters59 (4): 381-384
4.
Biggs, Michael. 2005. Strikes as forest fires: Chicago and Paris in the late 19th century. American Journal of Sociology111 (1): 1684-1714.
5.
Bogen, Kenneth T., and Edwin D. Jones. 2006. Risks of mortality and morbidity from worldwide terrorism: 1968-2004. Risk Analysis26 (1): 45-59.
6.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2003. Modeling the size of wars: From billiard balls to sandpiles. American Political Science Review97 (1): 135-150.
7.
Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 1991. On the likely magnitude, extent, and duration of the Iraq-UN war. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (3): 387-411.
8.
Clauset, Aaron, and Maxwell Young. 2005. Scale invariance in global terrorism. Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0502014 (accessed on February 3, 2005).
9.
Congleton, Roger D.2002. Terrorism, interest-group politics, and public policy. Independent Review7 (1): 47-67.
10.
Crook, Clive. 2006. The height of inequality. The Atlantic Monthly298 (2): 36-37.
11.
Enders, Walter E., and Todd Sandler. 2006. The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Farmer, J. Doyne, and John Geanakoplos. 2006. Power laws in economics and elsewhere. Unpublished manuscript. Santa Fe Institute, NM/Yale University, New Haven CT.
13.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counterterrorism Threat Assessment and Warning Unit, Counterterrorism Division. 1999. Terrorism in the United States, 1999. US Department of Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.fbi.gov/publications/terror/terror99.pdf (accessed on January 22, 2005).
14.
Gartner, Scott S.2004. Making the international local: The terrorist attack on the USS Cole, local casualties, and media coverage. Political Communication21 (1): 139-159.
15.
Goldstein, Michel L., Steven A. Morris, and Gary G. Yen. 2004. Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems41 (2): 255-258.
16.
Hoffman, Bruce. 1999. Terrorism trends and prospects. In Countering the new terrorism, edited by Ian O. Lesser, Bruce Hoffman, John Arquilla, David Ronfeldt, Michele Zanini, and Brian Michael Jenkins, 7-38. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
17.
Johnson, Neil F., Michael Spagat, Jorge Restrepo, Juan Bohorquez, Nicholás Suarez, Elvira Restrepo, and Roberto Zarama. 2005. From old wars to new wars and global terrorism. Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0506213 (accessed on June 29, 2005).
18.
Johnson, Neil F., Michael Spagat, Jorge A. Restrepo, Oscar Becerra, Juan C. Bohorquez, Nicholás Suarez, Elvira M. Restrepo, and Roberto Zarama. 2006. Universal patterns underlying ongoing wars and terrorism. Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0605035 (accessed on May 3, 2006).
19.
Kleiber, Christian, and Samuel Kotz. 2003. Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20.
Lacina, Bethany A.2006. Explaining the severity of civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (2): 276-289.
21.
Li, Lun, David Alderson, John C. Doyle, and Walter Willinger. 2005. Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: Definition, properties, and implications. Internet Mathematics2 (4): 431-523.
22.
Li, Quan. 2005. Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 278-297.
23.
Malamud, Bruce D., Gleb Morein, and Donald L. Turcotte. 1998. Forest fires: An example of self-organized critical behavior. Science281: 1840-1841.
24.
Mickolus, Edward F., Todd Sandler, Jean M. Murdock, and Peter A. Flemming. 2004. International terrorism: Attributes of terrorist events, 1968-2003 (ITERATE 3-4). Dunn Loring, VA: Vinyard Software.
25.
Mitzenmacher, Michael. 2004. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Mathematics1 (2): 226-251.
26.
National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. 2006. Terrorism knowledge base. http://www.tkb.org (access on June 18, 2006).
27.
Navarro, Peter, and Aaron Spencer. 2001. September 11, 2001: Assessing the costs of terrorism. Milken Institute Review (Fourth Quarter): 16-31.
28.
Newman, Mark. E. J.2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics46 (5): 323-351.
29.
Overgaard, Per B.1994. The scale of terrorist attacks as a signal of resources. Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (3): 452-478.
30.
Pape, Robert A.2003. The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review97 (3): 343-361.
31.
Press, William H., Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling. 1992. Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Reed, William J., and Barry D. Hughes. 2002. From gene families and genera to income and Internet file sizes: Why power laws are so common in nature. Physical Review E66 (6): 67103-67107.
33.
Reich, Walter. 1990. Origins of terrorism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Richardson, Lewis F.1948. Variation of the frequency of fatal quarrels with magnitude. Journal of the American Statistical Association43 (244): 523-546.
35.
Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Todd Sandler. 2005. The political economy of transnational terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 171-182.
36.
Sandler, Todd, and Daniel G. Arce M.2003. Terrorism and game theory. Simulation & Gaming34 (3): 319-337.
37.
Sandler, Todd, and Harvey E. Lapan. 1988. The calculus of dissent: An analysis of terrorists’ choice of targets. Synthese76 (2): 245-261.
38.
Serfling, Robert. 2002. Efficient and robust fitting of lognormal distributions. North American Actuarial Journal6 (1): 95-109.
39.
Shubik, Martin. 1997. Terrorism, technology, and the socioeconomics of death. Comparative Strategy16 (4): 399-414.
40.
Simon, Herbert. A.1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika42 (3/4): 425-440.
41.
United States Bureau of the Census. Census 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html (accessed on September 18, 2006).
42.
United States Department of State. 2004. Patterns of global terrorism, 2003. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of State, April. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/31912.pdf (accessed on January 22, 2005).
43.
Wilkinson, Paul. 1997. The media and terrorism: A reassessment. Terrorism and Political Violence9 (2): 51-64.
44.
Zipf, George K.1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
