Although overt repression has been studied extensively (e.g., mass arrests), there have been no rigorous investigations of covert repressive action (CRA; e.g., electronic and physical surveillance). To better understand the latter behavior, the author uses newdata about U.S. domestic intelligence activity directed against a Black Nationalist organization in Detroit, Michigan, during the late 1960s and early 1970s (N= 3,136, by neighborhood-month). In line with existing research, evidence reveals that CRA responds to dissent, lagged repression, and the level of economic development within a neighborhood. Differing from existing literature, however, results also disclose thatCRAresponds to where dissidents live and, most important, in accordance to the racial characteristics of the neighborhood within which potential targets are located. Wiretaps and tails are thus prompted by numerous factors, but the identity of challengers (i.e., political “profiling”) proves to be an essential part of the explanation.
Bergeson, Albert. 1982. Race riots of 1967: An analysis of police violence in Detroit and Newark. Journal of Black Studies12 (3): 261-274.
2.
Capos, Claudia. 1981. Forbidden files. Detroit Free Press, December 6, 11-12.
3.
Churchill, Ward, and Jim VanderWall. 1990. Agents of repression: The FBI’s secret wars against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian movement. Boston: South End.
4.
City of Detroit. 1971. Aprofile of Detroit: 1969. Detroit, MI: Mayor’s Committee for CommunityRenewal.
5.
Cunningham, David. 2004. There’s something happening here: The New Left, the Klan and FBI Counterintelligence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Dahl, Robert. 1966. Political opposition in Western democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Darden, Joel. 1987. Detroit: Race and uneven development. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
Davenport, Christian. 1995. Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 683-713.
9.
Davenport, Christian. 1999. The Republic of New Africa and the influence of political repression. Report SBR-9819274, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
10.
Davenport, Christian.,ed. 2000. Paths to state repression: Human rights violations and contentious politics. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
Davenport, Christian, and David Armstrong. 2004. Democracy and the violation of human rights: Astatistical analysis from 1976 to 1996. American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 538-554.
12.
Dawson, Michael. 1994. Behind the mule: Race and class in African American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Della Porta, Donatella, and Herbert Reiter, eds. 1998. Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in Western democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Donner, Frank. 1990. Protectors of privilege: Red Squads and police repression in urban America. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
15.
Duvall, Raymond, and Michael Stohl. 1983. Governance by terror. In Politics of terrorism, 3rd ed., edited by Michael Stohl. New York: Marcel Dekker.
16.
Fogelson, Robert. 1968. From resentment to confrontation: The police, the Negroes, and the outbreak of the nineteen-sixties riots. Political Science Quarterly83 (2): 217-247.
17.
Franks, C. E. S.1989. Dissent and the state. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Goldstein, Robert. 1978. Political repression in modern America: From 1870 to the present. Boston: Schennckman/G. K. Hall.
19.
Gurr, Ted. 1986. Persisting patterns of repression and rebellion: Foundations for a general theory of political coercion. In Persistent patterns and emergent structures in a waning century, edited by Margaret Karns. New York: Praeger.
20.
Hibbs, Douglas. 1973. Mass political violence. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Jacobs, David. 1979. Inequality and police strength: Conflict theory and coercive control in metropolitan areas. American Sociological Review44 (6): 913-925.
22.
Johnston, David, and Don Van Natta. 2001. Liberty and security: Ashcroft seeking to free F.B.I. to spy on groups. New York Times, December 1.
23.
King, Gary. 1989. Event count models for international relations: Generalizations and applications. International Studies Quarterly33:123-147.
24.
King, John. 2000. Exploring the ameliorating effects of democracy on political repression: Cross-national evidence. In Paths to state repression: Humanrights violations and contentious politics, edited by Christian Davenport. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
Klare, Michael, and Peter Kornbluh, eds. 1987. Low intensity warfare: Counterinsurgency, proinsurgency, and antiterrorism in the eighties. New York: Pantheon.
26.
Koehler, John. 1999. STASI: The untold story of the East German secret police. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Krain, Mathew. 1997. State-sponsored mass murder: A study of the onset and severity of genocides and politicides. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:331-360.
28.
Lichbach, Mark. 1987. Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution31:266-297.
29.
Locke, Hubert G.1969. The Detroit riot of 1967. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
30.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Lopez, George, and Michael Stohl, eds. 1989. Dependence, development, and state repression. New York: Greenwood.
32.
Marx, Gary. 1974. Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participant: The agent provocateur and the informant. American Journal of Sociology80 (2): 402-442.
33.
Moore, Will. 1998. Repression and dissent: Substitution, context and timing. American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 851-873.
34.
Obadele, Imari. 1995. America the nation-state: The politics of the United States from a state-building perspective. Baton Rouge, LA: The Malcolm Generation.
35.
Poe, Steven, and C. NealTate. 1994. Repression of personal integrity in the 1980’s: Aglobal analysis. American Political Science Review88:853-872.
36.
Republic of New Africa. 1968. Free the land [Flyer]. Radical Information Project, University of Maryland, College Park. http://www.cdavenport.com/.
37.
STATA. 2001. STATA reference manual. Release 7. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
38.
TALUS. 1968. A profile of southeastern Michigan. Detroit, MI: Detroit Regional Transportation and Land Use Study.
39.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Studying contentious politics: From eventful history to cycles of collective action. In Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest, edited by Dieter Rucht, Ruud Koopmans, and Friedhelm Neidhardt. Berlin, Germany: WZB.
40.
Walter, Eugene. 1969. Terror and resistance. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Wise, David. 1976. The American police state: The government against the people. New York: Random House.
42.
Zuehlke, Arthur. 1980. What is counterintelligence? In Intelligence requirements for the 1980s: Counterintelligence, edited by Roy Godson. New Brunswick, NJ: National Strategy Information Center.
43.
Zwerman, Gilda. 1990. Domestic counterterrorism: U.S. government responses to political violence on the left in the Reagan era. Social Justice16 (2): 31-63.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
