The Middle East is one of the most conflict-prone regions—butwhy? The Collier-Hoeffler model of civil war provides the starting point for our analysis. In an application to Africa, Collier and Hoeffler found poverty to be the most significant predictor of conflict. For conflict in the Middle East, a more complex picture emerges. Consistent with Collier and Hoeffler, the authors find that economic development and economic growth, in addition to longer periods of peace, generally decrease the likelihood of conflict. They also find that ethnic dominance is significant, while social fractionalization is not. Contrary to Collier and Hoeffler, they find that regime type matters. Variables for the Middle East region, Islamic countries, and oil dependence are not significant. Conflict in the Middle East is quite well explained by a general theory of civilwar, and there is no need to invoke a pattern of “Middle Eastern exceptionalism.”
Aarts, Paul. 1999. The Middle East: Aregion without regionalism or the end of exceptionalism?ThirdWorld Quarterly20 (5): 911-925.
2.
Addison, Tony, Philippe Le Billon, and S. Mansoob Murshed. 2002. Conflict in Africa: The cost of peaceful behaviour. Journal of African Economies11 (3): 365-386.
3.
Auty, Richard M., ed. 2001. Resource abundance and economic development. UNI/WIDER Studies in Development Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Barrett, David B., ed. 1982. World Christian encyclopedia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Barro, Robert J.1997. Determinants of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Beblawi, Hazem, and Giacomo Luiciani, eds. 1987. The rentier state. New York: Croom Helm.
7.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-crosssection analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal ofPolitical Science42 (4): 1260-1288.
8.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bureau of Verification and Compliance. 2000. World military expenditures and arms transfers 1998. Fact sheet, August 21, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC. Accessed from http://www.fas.org/man/docs/wmeat98/wmeat98fs.html/.
10.
Collier, Paul. 1999. Doing well out ofwar. Paper presented at the Conference on Economic Agendas in Civil Wars, April 26-27, London. Accessed from http://econ.worldbank.org/files/13200_CollierDoingWell.pdf/.
11.
Collier, Paul, Lani Elliot, Håvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Martha Reynal-Querol, and Nicholas Sambanis. 2003. Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington DC: World Bank.
12.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 1998. On economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers50 (4): 563-573.
13.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 1999. Justice-seeking and loot-seeking in civil war. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed from http://econ.worldbank.org/files/13203_CHJusticeSeeking.pdf/.
14.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2002. On the incidence of civil war in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 13-28.
15.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563-595.
16.
Correlates of War. 2002. Civil war dataset. Accessed from http://www.umich.edu/%7Ecowproj/dataset.html%23CivilWar/.
17.
Dahl, Robert A.1971. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Department of Geodesy and Cartography of the State Geological Committee of the USSR. 1964. Atlas Narodov Mira[Atlas of the people of the world]. Moscow: Department of Geodesy and Cartography of the State Geological Committee of the USSR.
19.
de Soysa, Indra. 2002. Paradise is a bazaar? Greed, creed and governance in civil war, 1989-99. Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 395-416.
20.
Donno, Daniela, and Bruce Russett. 2004. Islam, authoritarianism, and female empowerment: What are the linkages? Typescript, Department of Political Science, Yale University.
21.
Ellingsen, Tanja. 2000. Colorful community or ethnic witches’ brew? Multiethnicity and domestic conflict during and after the cold war. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (2): 228-249.
22.
Eriksson, Mikael, and PeterWallensteen. 2004. Armed conflict, 1989-2003. Journal of Peace Research41 (5): 625-636.
23.
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97 (1): 75-90.
24.
Fish, M. Steven. 2004. Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics55 (1): 4-37.
25.
Friedrich, Robert J.1982. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science26 (4): 797-833.
26.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, PeterWallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Håvard Strand. 2002. Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615-637.
27.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993. Minorities at risk: A global view of ethnopolitical conflict. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
29.
Hegre, Håvard, ed. 2004. Duration and termination of civilwar [Special issue]. Journal of Peace Research41 (5).
30.
Hegre, Håvard, Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2001. Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816-1992. American Political Science Review95 (1): 33-48.
31.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas F.1999. Environment, scarcity and violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Huntington, Samuel P.1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. London: Oklahoma University Press.
33.
Huntington, Samuel P.1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy’s thirdwave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-482.
36.
Kedourie, Elie. 1994. Democracy and Arab political culture. London: Frank Cass.
37.
King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9 (2): 137-163.
38.
Kramer, Martin. 1996. Islam and democracy. In Arab awakening & Islamic revival: The politics of ideas in the Middle East, edited by Martin Kramer, 265-278. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
39.
Lacina, Bethany, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2004. Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. Oslo, Norway: Centre for the Study of CivilWar, PRIO. Accessed from http://www.prio.no/cscw/cross/battledeaths/.
40.
Le Billon, Philippe. 2001. The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography20 (5): 561-584.
41.
Lonergan, Steve. 1997. Water resources and conflict: Examples from the Middle East. In Conflict and the environment, edited by Nils Petter Gleditsch, 375-384. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
42.
Owen, Roger, and Sevket Pamuk. 1999. A history of Middle East economies in the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Ross, Michael L.2001. Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics51 (1): 325-361.
44.
Rubin, Barry. 2002. The tragedy of the Middle East. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Sachs, Jeffrey D., and AndrewM. Warner. 1995. Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER Working Paper 5318, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
46.
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2002. Areviewof recent advances and future directions in the quantitative literature on civil war. Defence and Peace Economics13 (3): 215-243.
47.
Sick, Gary G., and Lawrence G. Potter, eds. 1997. The Persian Gulf at the millennium: Essays in politics, economy, security and religion. New York: St. Martin’s.
48.
Sköns, Elisabeth, Evamaria Loose-Weintraub, Wuyi Omitoogun, and Petter Stålenheim. 2002. Military expenditure. In SIPRI yearbook 2002: Armaments, disarmament and international security, 231-322. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
Smith, Benjamin. 2004. Oil wealth and regime survival in the developingworld, 1960-1999. American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 232-246.
50.
Sørli, Mirjam E. 2002. Resources, regimes and rebellion: A critical analysis of the greed and grievance model of civil conflict. Cand. polit. thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo and Centre for the Study of Civil War at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.
51.
StataCorp. 2003. Stata statistical software: Release 8.2 (1). College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
52.
Strand, Håvard, Lars Wilhelmsen, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2003. Armed conflict dataset codebook, version 1.2. Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute (PRIO). Accessed from http://www.prio.no/cwp/ArmedConflict/old/v1_20/Codebook_v1_2a.pdf/.
53.
Tucker, Richard. 1998. BTSCS software. Accessed from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/rtucker/programs/btscs/.
54.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2002. Arab human development report. New York: United Nations Development Program.
55.
Urdal, Henrik. 2002. The devil in the demographics: How neo-Malthusian population pressure and youth bulges influence the risk of domestic armed conflict. Cand. polit. thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway.
56.
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998. Journal of Peace Research37 (2): 251-265.
57.
Woltering, Robbert A. F. L.2002. The roots of Islamist popularity. ThirdWorld Quarterly23 (6): 1133-1143.
58.
World Bank. 2002. World development indicators. Washington, DC: Development Data Center, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
