The empirical literature on civil war has seen tremendous growth because of the compilation of quantitative data sets, but there is no consensus on the measurement of civil war. This increases the risk of making inferences from unstable empirical results. Without ad hoc rules to code its start and end and differentiate it from other violence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to define and measure civil war. A wide range of variation in parameter estimates makes accurate predictions of war onset difficult, and differences in empirical results are greater with respect to war continuation.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2001. Greed and grievance in civil war. Policy Research Paper 2355, World Bank.
2.
Connor, Ken.1998. Ghost force: The secret history of the SAS. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
3.
Doyle, Michael, and Nicholas Sambanis. 2000. International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review94 (4): 779-801.
4.
Fearon, James D.2003. Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth8:195-222.
5.
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97 (1): 75-90.
6.
Ghobarah, H., Paul Huth, and Bruce Russett. 2003. Civil wars kill and maim people, long after the fighting stops. American Political Science Review97 (2): 189-202.
7.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Håvard Strand, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Peter Wallensteen. 2001. Armed conflict 1945-99: A new dataset. Unpublished paper, PRIO, Oslo, Norway.
8.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Håvard Strand. 2002. Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615-637.
9.
Harff, Barbara. 2003. No lessons learned from the Holocaust? Assessing risks of genocide and political mass murder since 1955. American Political Science Review97 (1): 57-73.
10.
Hegre, Håvard, Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2001. Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816-1992. American Political Science Review95:33-48.
11.
Hegre, Håvard, and Nicholas Sambanis. 2004. Sensitivity analysis of empirical results in the quantitative literature on civil war. Unpublished manuscript, PRIO and Yale University.
12.
Leitenberg, Milton. 2001. Deaths in wars and conflicts between 1945 and 2000. Paper prepared for the Conference on Data Collection in Armed Conflict, June 8-9, Uppsala, Sweden.
13.
Licklider, Roy.1995. The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945-1993. American Political Science Review89 (3): 681-690.
14.
Marshall, Monty, and Keith Jaggers. 2000. Polity IV project [Codebook and data files]. Accessed from www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity/.
15.
Mason, David, and Patrick Fett. 1996. How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution40:546-568.
16.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Price, D. L.1975. Oman: Insurgency and development. Conflict studies. London: Institute for the Study of Conflict.
18.
Regan, Patrick. 1996. Conditions for successful third party interventions. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (1): 336-359.
19.
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2001. Do ethnic and nonethnic civil wars have the same causes? A theoretical and empirical inquiry (Part 1). Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 259-282.
20.
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2004. Expanding economic models of civil war using case studies. Perspectives on Politics2 (2): 259-279.
21.
Sarkees, Meredith Reid. 2000. The Correlates of War data on war: An update to 1997. Conflict Management and Peace Science18 (1): 123-144.
22.
Sarkees, Meredith Reid, and J. David Singer. 2001. The Correlates of War datasets: The totality of war. Paper prepared for the 42nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, February 20-24, Chicago.
23.
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1972. The wages of war, 1816-1965: A statistical handbook. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War project: International and civil war data, 1816-1992 [Computer file, Study #9905]. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
25.
Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil war, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Strand, Håvard, Lars Wilhelmsen, and Nils Petter Gleditsch, in collaboration with Peter Wallensteen, Margareta Sollenberg, Mikael Eriksson, Halvard Bulhaug, and Jan Ketil Rod. 2003. Armed conflict dataset codebook, version 1.2a. Accessed June 21, 2004, from http://www.prio.no/page/Project_detail//9244/44532.html?PHPSESSID=e92e0a3b72738fae3ff8585c12cd291b/.
27.
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From modernization to revolution. New York: Random House.
28.
Tilly, Charles. 2003. The politics of collective violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Valentino, Benjamin, Paul Huth, and Dylan Balch-Lindsay. 2001. Draining the sea: Mass killing, genocide, and guerilla warfare. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
30.
Walter, Barbara. 2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
