The effects of economies of scale in government, trade openness, preference heterogeneity, and regime type are used to explain why the average size of states within the international system nearly doubled between 1816 and 1876 and then contracted over the 20th century. No one variable appears to explain the trend fully. Results suggest that the rise in territorial size during the 19th century is the product of a growing number of federal democracies, which tend to be large, and that the decline in average size during the 20th century is the result of a growing number of unitary democracies, which tend to be small. Increasing economies of scale in the 19th century may have led to the rise of large federal democracies, whereas economic liberalism may have allowed unitary democracies to prosper in the 20th century.
Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly. 1999. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics114 (4): 1243-1284.
2.
Alesina, Alberto, and Enrico Spolaore. 1997. On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics112:1027-1056.
3.
Alesina, Alberto, and Enrico Spolaore. 2003. The size of nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Banks, Arthur S.1976. Cross-national time series, 1815-1973. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
5.
Bean, Richard. 1973. War and the birth of the nation state. Journal of Economic History33:203-221.
6.
Bolton, Patrick, and Gerard Roland. 1997. The breakup of nations: A political economy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics112:1057-1090.
7.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2003. Generating state-size distributions: A geopolitical model. Manuscript, Center for Comparative and International Studies, Zurich, Switzerland.
8.
Dahl, Robert A., and Edward R. Tufte. 1973. Size and democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Dudley, Leonard M.1991. The word and the sword: How techniques of information and violence have shaped our world. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
10.
Fazal, Tanisha. 2000. Born to lose and doomed to survive: State death and survival in the international system. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31 to September 3, in Washington, DC.
11.
Fearon, James, and Pieter Van Houten. 1998. The politicization of cultural and economic differences: A return to the theory of regional autonomy movements. Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5, in Boston.
12.
Friedman, David. 1977. A theory of the size and shape of nations. Journal of Political Economy85 (1): 59-77.
13.
Friedman, Thomas L.2000. The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: Random House.
14.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
15.
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael D. Ward. 1999. Interstate system membership: A revised list of the independent states since 1816. International Interactions25:393-413.
16.
Goertz, Gary, and Paul F. Diehl. 1992. Territorial changes and international conflict. New York: Routledge.
17.
Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1979. The reemergence of “peripheral nationalisms”: Some comparative speculations on the spatial distribution of political leadership and economic growth. Comparative Studies in Society and History21:303-322.
18.
Harley, C. Knick. 1988. Ocean freight rates and productivity, 1740-1913: The primacy of mechanical invention reaffirmed. Journal of Economic History48:851-876.
19.
Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Hiscox, Michael J., and David A. Lake. 2002. Democracy, federalism and the size of states. Manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
21.
Holsti, Kalevi J.1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order 1648-1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Hufbauer, Gary. 1991. World economic integration: The long view. International Economic Insights2 (3): 26-27.
23.
Jackson, Robert H., and Carl G. Rosberg. 1982. Why Africa’s weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics35 (1): 1-24.
24.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1996. POLITY III: Regime change and political authority, 1800-1994. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
25.
Katzenstein, Peter J.1985. Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Keohane, Robert O.1971. The big influence of small allies. Foreign Policy2:161-182.
27.
Lake, David A.1992. Powerful pacifists: Democratic states and war. American Political Science Review86 (1): 24-37.
28.
Lake, David A.1999. Entangling relations: American foreign policy in its century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2000. Polity IV: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2002. College Park: University of Maryland-College Park, Center for International Development and Conflict Management. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.
30.
Mitchell, B. R.1962. Abstract of British historical statistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Mitchell, B. R.1998a. International historical statistics: Africa, Asia and Oceania, 1750-1993. London: MacMillan.
32.
Mitchell, B. R.1998b. International historical statistics: Europe, 1750-1993. London: MacMillan.
33.
Mitchell, B. R.1998c. International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750-1993. London: MacMillan.
34.
O’Rourke, Kevin H., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1999. Globalization and history: The evolution of a nineteenth-century Atlantic economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Quester, George H.1977. Offense and defense in the international system. New York: John Wiley.
36.
Rector, Chad. 2003. Federations and international politics. Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego.
37.
Roeder, Philip G.2004. Ethnolinguistic Fractionalization (ELF) Indices, 1961 and 1985. May. http//:weber.ucsd.edu%5Cproeder%5Celf.htm.
38.
Rosenau, James N.1990. Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Russett, Bruce M.1968. Is there a long-run trend toward concentration in the international system? In Economic theories of international politics, ed. Bruce M. Russett.Chicago: Markham.
40.
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and civil war data, 1816-1992. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
41.
The Statesman’s Yearbook. Various issues from 1866-2002. New York: St. Martin’s.
42.
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. n.d. Statistical abstract of the United States. Various issues. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
Wittman, Donald. 1991. Nations and states: Mergers and acquisitions; dissolutions and divorce. American Economic Review81 (2): 126-129.
44.
Wittman, Donald. 1998. The wealth and size of nations: An efficiency explanation. November. Manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.
45.
World Bank. 2001. World development indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
