This study argues that a subtle shift in the primary independent variable of the commercial peace literature—from trade to free trade—provides an opportunity to respond to the some of the strongest criticisms of this research program. Free trade, and not just trade, promotes peace by removing an important foundation of domestic privilege—protective barriers to international commerce—that enhances the domestic power of societal groups likely to support war, reduces the capacity of free-trading interests to limit aggression in foreign policy, and simultaneously generates political support for the state often used to build its war machine. A series of statistical tests demonstrates that higher levels of free trade, rather than trade alone, reduce military conflict between states. Moreover, contrary to conventional wisdom, these arguments suggest how the puzzling case of World War I may confirm, rather than contradict, the central claims of commercial liberalism.
Alt, James E., and Michael Gilligan. 1994. The political economy of trading states: Factor specificity, collective action problems, and domestic political institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy2 (2):165-192.
2.
Apostol, Paul N., Michael W. Bernatzky, and Alexander M. Michelson. 1928. Russian public finance during the war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The liberal illusion: Does trade promote peace?Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Barbieri, Katherine, and Gerald Schneider. 1999. Globalization and peace: Assessing new directions in the study of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research36 (4): 387-404.
5.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan M. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-1288.
6.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26:179-204.
7.
Berghahn, V. R.1993. Germany and the approach of war in 1914. 2nd ed.New York: St. Martin’s.
8.
Brawley, Mark. 1993. Regime types, markets, and war. Comparative Political Studies26 (2): 178-197.
9.
Cobden, Richard. 1868. The political writings of Richard Cobden, vols. 1-2. London: William Ridgway.
10.
Cobden, Richard. 1870. Speeches on questions of public policy, vols. 1-2, ed. John Bright and James E. Thorold RogersLondon: Macmillan and Co.
11.
Copeland, Dale C.1996. Economic interdependence and war: A theory of trade expectations. International Security20 (4): 5-41.
12.
Deutsch, Karl, et al.1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Dixon, William J.1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (1): 42-68.
14.
Domke, William. 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Edwards, Sebastian. 1993. Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries. Journal of Economic Literature31 (3): 1358-1393.
16.
Edwards, Sebastian. 1998. Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know?Economic Journal108:383-398.
17.
Eggertsson, Thráinn.1990. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
19.
Flam, Harry, and M. June Flanders. 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Friedrich, Robert J.1982. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science26 (4): 797-833.
21.
Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant we all get along? Opportunity, willingness, and the origins of the democratic peace. American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 1-27.
22.
Gartzke, Erik, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer. 2001. Investing in the peace: Economic interdependence and international conflict. International Organization55 (2): 391-438.
23.
Gelpi, Christopher, and Joe Grieco. 2003. Economic interdependence, the democratic state, and the liberal peace. In Economic interdependence and international conflict: New perspectives on an enduring debate, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins,44-59. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
Gibler, Douglas M., and Meredith Sarkees. 2004. Measuring alliances: The Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance data set, 1816-2000. Journal of Peace Research41 (2): 211-222.
25.
Gowa, Joanne. 1999. Ballots and bullets: The elusive democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Gowa, Joanne, and Edward D. Mansfield. Forthcoming. Alliances, imperfect markets, and major-power trade. International Organization.
27.
Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1994. Protection for sale. American Economic Review84 (4): 833-850.
28.
Hansen, John Mark. 1990. Taxation and the political economy of the tariff. International Organization44 (4): 527-551.
29.
Heston, Alan, Robert Summers, and Bettina Aten. 2002. Penn World Table version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu.
30.
Hiscox, Michael J., and Scott L. Kastner. 2002. A general measure of trade policy orientations: Gravity-model-based estimates for 82 nations, 1960 to 1992. Working study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
31.
Howard, Michael. 1978. War and the liberal conscience. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
32.
International Monetary Fund. 2003. Direction of trade statistics. CD-ROM. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
33.
Jaggers, Keith, and Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy’s third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-482.
34.
Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15 (2): 163-213.
35.
Jones, Ronald. 1971. A three-factor model in theory, trade, and history. In Trade, balance of payments, and growth, ed. J. Bhagwati, Ronald Jones, Robert A. Mundell, and Jaroslav Vanek, 3-21. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36.
Kugler, Jacek, and Douglas Lemke, eds. 1996. Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of The War Ledger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Leamer, Edward D.1988. Measures of openness. In Trade policy issues and empirical analysis, ed. Robert E. Baldwin, 147-200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Levy, Jack S.1989. The diversionary theory of war: A critique. In Handbook of war studies, ed. Manus I. Midlarsky, 259-288. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
40.
Mansfield, Edward D.1994. Power, trade, and war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2000. Trade blocs, trade flows, and international conflict. International Organization54:775-808.
42.
Mansfield, Edward D., Jon C. Pevehouse, and David H. Bearce. 1999-2000. Preferential trading arrangements and military disputes. Security Studies9:92-118.
43.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Brian M. Pollins. 2001. The study of interdependence and conflict: Recent advances, open questions, and directions for future research. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (6): 834-859.
44.
Mearsheimer, John J.1991. Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. In The cold war and after: Prospects for peace, ed. Sean M. Lynn-Jones, 141-192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization51 (4): 513-554.
46.
Morrow, James D.1999. How could trade affect conflict?Journal of Peace Research36 (4): 481-489.
47.
Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly41 (2): 267-294.
48.
Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1999. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research36 (4): 423-432.
49.
O’Rourke, Kevin H., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1999. Globalization and history: The evolution of a nineteenth-century Atlantic economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
Papayoanou, Paul. 1999. Power ties: Economic interdependence and war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51.
Polachek, Solomon W.1980. Conflict and trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution24:55-78.
52.
Polachek, Solomon W., John Robst, and Yuan-Ching Chang. 1999. Liberalism and interdependence: Extending the trade-conflict model. Journal of Peace Research36 (4): 405-422.
53.
Ricardo, David. 1821/1973. The principles of political economy and taxation. London: Dent.
54.
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Jean-Marc F. Blanchard. 1996-97. Commercial liberalism under fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies6 (2): 4-50.
55.
Rodrik, Dani. 1995. Trade policy and industrial reform. In Handbook of development economics, vol. 3B, ed. Jere Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, 2925-2982. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56.
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and coalitions: How trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.
58.
Rowe, David M.1999. World economic expansion and national security in pre-World War I Europe. International Organization53 (2): 195-231.
59.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
60.
Samuelson, Paul A.1971. Ohlin was right. Swedish Journal of Economics73 (4): 365-384.
61.
Schneider, Gerald, and Gunther G. Schulze. 2003. The domestic roots of commercial liberalism: A sector-specific approach. In Globalization and armed conflict, ed. Gerald Schneider, Katherine Barbieri, and Nils Petter Gleditsch, 103-122. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
62.
Schumpeter, Joseph A.1919/1951. The sociology of imperialisms. In Imperialism and social classes, ed. Paul M. Sweezy, trans. Heinz Norden, 1-130. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Inc.
63.
Signorino, Curtis S., and Jeffery Ritter. 1999. Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43:115-144.
64.
Simmons, Beth. 2003. Pax Mercatoria and the theory of the state. In Economic interdependence and international conflict: New perspectives on an enduring debate, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, 31-43. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
65.
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war, and numbers, ed. Bruce Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
66.
Spring, D.W.1988. Russia and the coming of war. In The coming of the First World War, ed. R. J. W. Evans and Hartmut Pogge von Strandmann, 57-86. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
67.
Stein, Arthur A.1993. Governments, economic interdependence, and international cooperation. In Behavior, society, and international conflict, ed. Philip Tetlock, Jo Husbands, Robert Jervis, Paul Stern, and Charles Tilly, 241-324. New York: Oxford University Press for the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
68.
Stevenson, David. 1996. Armaments and the coming of war: Europe, 1904-1914. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
69.
Stigler, George J.1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2 (1): 3-21.
70.
Stolper, Wolfgang F., and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. Protection and real wages. Review of Economic Studies9 (1): 58-73.
71.
Viner, Jacob. 1951. International economics. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
72.
Wagner, Harrison. 2000. Bargaining and war. American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 469-484.
73.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
74.
Weede, Erich. 1995. Economic policy and international security: Rent-seeking, free trade and democratic peace. European Journal of International Relations1 (4): 519-537.
75.
Williamson, Oliver E.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
76.
World Bank. 2003. World development indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
