There is nowsubstantial evidence that defense spending decisions in the United States are influenced by citizen preferences. However, there is little time-series evidence for countries other than the United States. Regression models of citizen responsiveness and opinion representation in the politics of defense spending in five democracies are estimated. Results showthat public opinion in all five countries is systematically responsive to recent changes in defense spending, and the form of the responses across countries uniformly resembles the “thermostat” metaphor developed by Wlezien and the more general theory of opinion dynamics developed by Stimson. Findings showalso that defense budgeting is representative: public support for defense spending is the most consistently significant influence on defense budgeting change in four countries; thus, a parsimonious theory of comparative policy representation is potentially within reach. The implications of the results for defense spending in the NATO alliance and the European Union are discussed.
Asher, Herbert . 1998. Polling and the public. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
2.
Bartels, Larry M.1991. Constituency opinion and congressional policy-making: The Reagan defense buildup. American Political Science Review85:457-474.
3.
Bartels, Larry M.1994. The American public's defense spending preferences in the post—cold war era. Public Opinion Quarterly58:479-508.
4.
The British social attitudes cumulative sourcebook. 1990. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
5.
Brooks, Joel E.1985. Democratic frustration in the Anglo-American polities: A quantification of the inconsistency between mass public opinion and public policy. Western Political Quarterly38:250-261.
6.
Brooks, Joel E.1987. The opinion-policy nexus in France: Do institutions and ideology make a difference?Journal of Politics49:465-480.
7.
Brooks, Joel E.1990. The opinion-policy nexus in Germany. Public Opinion Quarterly54:508-529.
8.
Crecine, J. P.1970. Defense budgeting: Organizational adaptation to external constraint. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
9.
Eichenberg, Richard C. 1981. Defense/welfare tradeoffs in German budgeting. Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan.
10.
Eichenberg, Richard C.1989. Public opinion and national security in Western Europe: Consensus lost?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
Eichenberg, Richard C. Forthcoming. Having it both ways: European defense integration and the commitment to NATO. Public Opinion Quarterly.
12.
Eichenberg, Richard C. , and Richard J. Stoll. 1989. Straightjacket: Public support for defense spending in four Western countries, 1960-1988. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August-September, Atlanta, GA.
13.
Flynn, Gregory , and Hans Rattinger. 1985. The public and Atlantic defense. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
14.
Greenwood, David . 1982. The defense policy of the United Kingdom. In The defense policies of nations, edited by Douglas J. Murray and Paul R. Viotti, 197-225. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Hartley, Thomas , and Bruce Russett. 1992. Public opinion and the common defense: Who governs military spending in the United States?American Political Science Review86:905-915.
16.
Hoffmann, Stanley . 1983. Dead ends: American foreign policy in the new cold war. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17.
Holsti, Ole . 1996. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Isernia, Pierangelo . 2000. Where angels fear to tread: Italian public opinion and foreign policy. In Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and foreign policy in the 21st century, edited by Brigitte Nacos, Robert Y. Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia, 279-295. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
19.
Jones, Daniel M. , Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15:163-213.
20.
Kanter, Arnold . 1979. Defense politics: A budgetary perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
LaBalme, Natalie . 2000. Constraint, catalyst, or political tool? The French public and foreign policy. In Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and foreign policy in the 21st century, edited by Brigitte Nacos, Robert Y. Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia, 265-278. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
22.
Lord, Guy . 1973. The French budgetary process. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Martin, Laurence . 1981. The domestic content of British defense policy. In The internal fabric of Western security, edited by Gregory Flynn, 153-176. London: Croom Helm.
24.
Mayer, William G.1992. The changing American mind. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
Mueller, John . 1973. War, presidents and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
26.
Niemi, Richard G. , John Mueller, and Tom W. Smith. 1989. Trends in public opinion: A compendium of survey data. New York: Greenwood.
27.
Nincic, Miroslav . 1988. The United States, the Soviet Union, and the politics of opposites. World Politics, 40:452-475.
28.
Ostrom, Charles W. , and Robin F. Marra. 1986. U.S. defense spending and the Soviet estimate. American Political Science Review80:819-842.
29.
Page, Benjamin I. , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1983. Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review77:175-190.
30.
Page, Benjamin I. , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans'policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Page, Benjamin I. , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. Democratic responsiveness? Untangling the links between public opinion and policy. PS: Political Science and Politics27:25-28.
32.
Palmer, Glenn . 1990. Alliance politics and issues areas: Determinants of defense spending. American Journal of Political Science34:190-211.
33.
Peffley, Mark , and Jon Hurwitz. 1992. International events and foreign policy beliefs: Public response to Soviet-U.S. relations. American Journal of Political Science36:431-461.
34.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas . 1991. Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics43:479-512.
35.
Sandler, Todd , and Keith Hartley. 1999. The political economy of NATO: Past, present, and into the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Shapiro, Robert Y. , and Lawrence R. Jacobs. 2000. Who leads and who follows? U.S. presidents, public opinion, and foreign policy. In Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and foreign policy in the 21st century, edited by Brigitte Nacos, Robert Y. Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia, 223-245. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
37.
Shapiro, Robert Y. , and Benjamin I. Page. 1988. Foreign policy and the rational public. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:211-247.
38.
Shapiro, Robert Y. , and Benjamin I. Page. 1994. Foreign policy and public opinion. In The new politics of American foreign policy, edited by David Deese, 216-235. New York: St. Martin's.
39.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Soroka, Stuart N. , and Christopher Wlezien. 2002. Opinion-policy dynamics: Public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom. Paper delivered to the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Annual Conference, September, Salford, UK.
41.
Stimson, James A.1995. Opinion and representation. American Political Science Review89:179-183.
42.
Stimson, James A.1999. Public opinion in America: Mood, cycles, and swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Stimson, James A. , Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89:543-565.
44.
Stoll, Richard J.1992. Too little, but not for too long: Public attitudes on defense spending. In The political economy of military spending in the United States, edited by Alex Mintz, 52-64. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Taylor, William J.1982. The defense policy of Sweden. In The defense policies of nations, edited by Douglas J. Murray and Paul R. Viotti, 299-322. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Wildavsky, Aaron . 1982. Budgeting: A comparative theory of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.
49.
Wilson, George C.2000. This war really matters: Inside the fight for defense dollars. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
50.
Wittkopf, Eugene . 1990. The faces of internationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
Wittkopf, Eugene . 1996. What Americans really think about foreign policy. Washington Quarterly19:91-106.
52.
Wlezien, Christopher . 1995. The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39:981-1000.
53.
Wlezien, Christopher . 1996. Dynamics of representation: The case of US spending on defense. British Journal of Political Science26:81-103.
54.
Wlezien, Christopher . Forthcoming. Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. Journal of Politics.
55.
Yost, David . 1978. French defense budgeting: Persistent constraints and future prospects. Paper presented to the Convention of the International Studies Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
