Competing hypotheses are tested on an extensive set of defense-burden data to determine the general factors that influence states' levels of military spending. Results provide some clear answers to longstanding questions and supply new findings that beg further investigation. When controls are introduced for domestic political and economic factors, several international factors, including alliances and rivalries, lose statistical significance. Consistent with liberal theory, regime type has a robust effect: democracies spend proportionately less on defense than other states. As implied by realism, under conditions of economic growth or high levels of wealth, “extra” resources are diverted disproportionately to the military.
Ades, Alberto , and Hak B. Chua. 1997. Thy neighbor's curse: Regional instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth2:279-304.
2.
Beck, Nathaniel . 2001. Time-series cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years?Annual Review of Political Science4:271-293.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel , and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do and not to do with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89 (3): 634-647.
4.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan Stam. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26:179-204.
5.
Benoit, Emile . 1973. Defense and economic growth in developing countries. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
Blomberg, S. Brock . 1996. Growth, political instability and the defence burden. Economica63:649-672.
7.
Bremer, Stuart . 1980. National capabilities and war proneness. In The Correlates of War II: Testing some realpolitik models, edited by J. David Singer, 57-82. New York: Free Press.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93 (4): 791-807.
9.
Chan, Steve . 1988. Defense spending and economic growth: Unraveling the Taiwanese enigma. American Political Science Review82 (3): 913-920.
10.
Chan, Steve . 1991. The political economy of military spending and economic performance: Directions for future research. In The political economy of defense: Issues and perspectives, edited by Andrew L. Ross, 203-222. New York: Greenwood.
11.
Christensen, Thomas J.1997. Perceptions and alliances in Europe, 1865-1940. International Organization51 (1): 65-97.
12.
Cothren, Richard . 2002. A model of military spending and economic growth. Public Choice110:121-142.
13.
Crecine, J. P.1971. Defense budgeting. In Studies in budgeting, edited by R. I. Byrne, 210-261. Amsterdam: North Holland.
14.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr.2000. The guns-growth relationship in Israel. Journal of Peace Research37 (1): 71-83.
15.
Diehl, Paul F. , and Mark J. C. Crescenzi. 1998. Reconfiguring the arms race-war debate. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (1): 111-118.
16.
Domke, William K.1991. Fiscal constraints and defense planning in advanced industrial democracies. In The political economy of defense: Issues and perspectives, edited by Andrew L. Ross, 23-40. New York: Greenwood.
17.
Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter . 1982. The seduction of power: Serious international disputes and the power status of nations, 1900-1976. International Interactions9:57-74.
18.
Garfinkel, Michelle R.1994. Domestic politics and international conflict. American Economic Review84 (5): 1294-1309.
19.
Gates, William R. , and Katsuaki L. Teresawa. 1992. Commitment, threat perceptions, and expenditures in defense alliance. International Studies Quarterly36:101-118.
20.
Gilpin, Robert . 1981. War and change in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hamilton, Lawrence C.2003. Statistics with STATA: Updated for version 7. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
22.
Harrison, Mark . 1998. The economics of World War II: An overview. In The economics of World War II: Six great powers in international comparison, edited by Mark Harrison, 1-42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hartley, Keith , and Todd Sandler, eds. 1990. The economics of defence spending: An international survey. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
24.
Heo, Uk . 1998. Modeling the defense-growth relationship around the globe. Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (5): 637-657.
25.
Hill, Kim Quaile . 1978. Domestic politics, international linkages, and military expenditures. Studies in Comparative International Development13 (1): 38-59.
26.
Inglehart, Ronald . 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Jacobson, Harold K.1985. The determination of the United States military force posture: Political processes and policy changes. Washington, DC: International Security Program, Woodrow Wilson Center.
28.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32:469-482.
29.
Kegley, Charles W., Jr. , ed. 1995. Controversies in international relations theory: Realism and the neoliberal challenge. New York: St. Martin's.
30.
Khanna, Jyoti , and Todd Sandler. 1996. NATO burden sharing: 1960-1992. Defence and Peace Economics7 (2): 115-133.
31.
Lebovic, James H.1998. Consider the source: Organizational bias in estimates of foreign military spending. International Studies Quarterly42:161-174.
32.
Lemke, Douglas , and Suzanne Werner. 1996. Power parity, commitment to change, and war. International Studies Quarterly40:235-260.
33.
Looney, Robert E. , and Peter C. Frederikson. 2000. The effect of declining military influence on defense budgets in Latin America. Armed Forces and Society26 (3): 437-449.
34.
Maddala, G. S.1998. Recent developments in dynamic econometric modelling: A personal viewpoint. Political Analysis7:59-87.
35.
Maoz, Zeev . 1996. Domestic sources of global change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review87:624-638.
37.
Mayer, Kenneth R.1992. Elections, business cycles, and the timing of defense contract awards in the United States. In The political economy of military spending in the United States, edited Alex Mintz, 15-32. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
38.
McDermott, Rose , Jonathan Cowden, and Cheryl Koopman. 2001. Framing, uncertainty, and hostile communications in a crisis experiment. Political Psychology23 (1): 133-149.
39.
Mintz, Alex . 1989. Guns versus butter: A disaggregated analysis. American Political Science Review83 (4): 1285-1293.
40.
Mintz, Alex , ed. 1992. The political economy of military spending in the United States. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
41.
Mintz, Alex , and Michael Ward. 1989. The political economy of military spending in Israel. American Political Science Review83 (2): 521-533.
42.
Mintz, Alex , and Michael Ward. 1991. Electoral cycles and defense spending in Israel. In The political economy of defense: Issues and perspectives, edited by Andrew L. Ross, 135-153. New York: Greenwood.
43.
Mohammed, Nadir A. L.1993. A rejoinder. Journal of Peace Research30 (1): 99.
44.
Morrow, James D.1993. Arms versus allies: Trade-offs in the search for security. International Organization47 (2): 207-233.
45.
Mousseau, Michael . 2002. An economic limitation to the zone of democratic peace and cooperation. International Interactions28 (2): 135-164.
46.
Nincic, Miroslav . 1982. The arms race: The political economy of military growth. New York: Praeger.
47.
Rasler, Karen A. , and William R. Thompson. 1992. Political-economic tradeoffs and British relative decline. In Defense, welfare, and growth, edited by Steve Chan and Alex Mintz, 36-60. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
48.
Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Russett, Bruce . 1970. What price vigilance? The burdens of national defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
Russett, Bruce . 1990. Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Russett, Bruce , and John Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
52.
Sample, Susan G.2000. Military buildups: Arming and war. In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez, 165-195. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
53.
Sandler, Todd , and Keith Hartley. 1995. The economics of defense. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1993. National material capabilities data, 1816-1985 [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
55.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Smith, Ron P.1977. Military expenditures and capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics1:61-76.
57.
Smith, Ron P.1992. Models of military expenditure. In Defense, welfare, and growth, edited by Steve Chan and Alex Mintz, 99-118. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
58.
Sprout, Harold , and Margaret Sprout. 1968. The dilemma of rising demands and insufficient resources. World Politics20 (4): 660-693.
59.
Stromberg, J.1970. The internal mechanisms of the defense budgetary process: Fiscal year 1953-1968. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
60.
Thies, Cameron G.2001. A social psychological approach to enduring rivalries. Political Psychology22 (4): 693-725.
61.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
62.
Wayman, Frank Whelon . 2000. Rivalries: Recurrent disputes and explaining war. In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez, 219-234. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
63.
Westing, Arthur H.1978. Military expenditures and their reduction. Bulletin of Peace Proposals9:24-29.
64.
Williams, John T. , and Michael D. McGinnis. 1992. Expectations and the dynamics of US defense budgets: A critique of organizational reaction models. In The political economy of military spending in the United States, edited by Alex Mintz, 282-304. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
