Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A cellular automata model is used to study aspects of cultural change in spatial environments. Cultures are represented as bit strings in individual cells. Cultures may change because they become more similar to prevailing nearby cultures, are subject to intrinsic random changes, or expand to previously empty cells. Extending Axelrod's (1997) results, the authors show that assimilation does not lead to a single homogeneous culture even if, unlike in Axelrod's model, cultural assimilation may take place even between neighboring cells with zero similarity; intrinsic changes decrease rather than increase the number of stable cultural regions; and expansion of a single culture in a previously unoccupied territory does not result in a single culture in the entire territory. Geographical features (such as mountains) that are an obstacle to contact between cells increase the number of different cultural regions.

Keywords

cultural diffusion cellular automata cultural regions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammerman, A. J. , and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza . 1984. The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Antinucci, F. , F. Cecconi , F. Natale , and D. Parisi . 2002. Simulation of agricultural expansion through a cellular automaton. Rome: Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council.

Axelrod, R. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:203-26.

Boyd, R. , and P. J. Richerson . 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Castellano, C. , M. Marsili , and A. Vespignani . 2000. Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence. Physical Review Letters 85:3536-39.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. , and M. W. Feldmann . 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution. A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel: The fate of human societies. New York: Norton.

Epstein, J. M. , and R. L. Axtell . 1996. Growing artificial societies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Friedkin, N. E. , and E. C. Johnsen . 1990. Social influence and opinion. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25:193-205.

10.

Kennedy, J. 1998. Thinking is social: Experiments with the adaptive culture model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:56-76.

11.

Latané, B. 1981. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36:343-65.

12.

March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:71-87.

13.

Nowak, A. , J. Szamrej , and B. Latané . 1990. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97:362-76.

14.

Parisi, D. , and M. Ugolini . Forthcoming. Living in enclaves. Complexity.

15.

Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and language: The puzzle of Indo-European origins. London: Jonathan Cape.

16.

Shibanai, Y. , S. Yasuno , and I. Ishiguro . 2001. Effects of global information feedback on diversity. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45:80-96.

17.

Ugolini, M. , and D. Parisi . 1999. Simulating the evolution of artifacts. In Advances in artificial life, edited by D. Floreano , J.-D. Nicoud , and F. Mondada , 173-82. Berlin: Springer.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB