How best to classify event counts of directed dyadic foreign policy behavior and how best to model them are points of disagreement among researchers. Should such series be modeled as unit roots ("perfect" memory) or as stationary ("short" memory)? It is demonstrated that the dichotomous choice between unit root (I(1)) and level stationarity (I(0)) is overly restrictive. The intermediate (and more general) possibility of fractional integration (0<I<1), a concept proven useful in studies of aggregate opinion, is applied. Results show that fractional integration is extremely common and that error correction mechanisms (ECMs) can still be appropriate in the absence of unit-root series. Fractional ECMs are used in action-reaction models of bilateral relationships to demonstrate this. Given the frequency of fractional integration, its flexibility, and the problems encountered when ignoring it, scholars should incorporate fractional integration techniques into their models.
Allen, Susan Hannah . 2000. Keeping one eye on the target. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, November 8-11, Atlanta, GA.
2.
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan , and Andrew J. Enterline. 2000. Killing time: The world politics of civil war duration, 1820-1992. International Studies Quarterly4 (December): 615-42.
3.
Bennett, D. Scott . 1996. Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. International Studies Quarterly40 (June): 157-84.
4.
--- 1997. Testing alternative models of alliance duration, 1816-1984. American Journal of Political Science41 (July): 846-78.
5.
--- 1998. Integrating and testing models of rivalry termination. American Journal of Political Science42 (October): 1200-32.
6.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam III. 1996. The duration of interstate wars, 1816-1985. American Political Science Review90 (June): 239-57.
7.
Blainey, Geoffrey . 1988. The causes of war. 3d ed.New York: Free Press.
8.
Bolks, Sean M. , and D'Ina Al-Sowayel. 2000. How long do economic sanctions last? Examining the sanctioning process through duration. Political Research Quarterly53 (June): 241-65.
9.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , Laura W. Arnold, and Christopher J.W. Zorn. 1997. The strategic timing of position taking in Congress: A study of the North American Free Trade Agreement. American Political Science Review91 (2): 324-38.
10.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and Bradford S. Jones. 1997. Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science41 (October): 1414-61.
11.
--- 2003. Timing and political change: Event history models in political science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and Christopher Zorn. 2001. Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. American Journal of Political Science45 (October): 951-67.
13.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review89 (December): 841-55.
14.
Collett, Dave . 1994. Modelling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.
15.
Deutsch, Karl . 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Diehl, Paul F. , and Gary Goertz. 2000. War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Diehl, Paul F. , Jennifer Reifschneider, and Paul R. Hensel. 1996. United Nations intervention and recurring conflict. International Organization50 (autumn): 683-700.
18.
Finnemore, Martha . 1993. International organizations as teachers of norms: The United Nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization and science policy. International Organization47 (autumn): 565-97.
19.
Fortna, Virginia Page. 1998. Apeace that lasts: Agreements and the durability of peace. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.
20.
Friedrich, Robert J.1982. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science26 (November): 797-833.
21.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor . 1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization50 (winter): 109-39.
22.
Goemans, H. E.2000. Fighting for survival: The fate of leaders and the duration of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (October): 555-79.
23.
Golub, Jonathan . 2002. Institutional reform and decisionmaking in the European Union. In Institutional challenges in the European Union, edited by Madeleine Hosli and Adrian Van Deemen. London: Routledge.
24.
Golub, Jonathan, and Dave Collett. 2002. Improving model specification in duration analysis: Time-sensitive covariates and cox models. Working paper, Reading University.
25.
Grambsch, Patricia M. , and Terry M. Therneau. 1994. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika81 (3): 515-26.
26.
Grieco, Joseph M.2001. Repetitive military challenges and recurrent international conflicts, 1918-1994. International Studies Quarterly45 (June): 295-316.
27.
Haas, Ernest B.1958. The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces 1950-57. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
Hartzell, Caroline , Matthew Hoddie, and Donald Rothchild. 2001. Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization55 (winter): 181-208.
29.
Hensel, Paul R.1994. One thing leads to another: Recurrent militarized disputes in Latin America, 1816-1986. Journal of Peace Research31 (August): 281-97.
30.
Huth, Paul K.1996. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Ireland, Michael J. , and Scott Sigmund Gartner. 2001. Time to fight: Government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (October): 547-68.
32.
Jepperson, Ronald L. , Alexander Wendt, and Peter J. Katzenstein. 1996. Norms, identity, and culture in national security. In The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 33-75. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Jervis, Robert . 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Johnston, Alastair Iain . 2001. Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly45 (December): 487-515.
35.
Kahl, Colin H.1999. Constructing a separate peace: Constructivism, collective liberal identity, and democratic peace. Security Studies8 (winter-spring): 95-144.
36.
Kalbfleisch, J. D. , and R. L. Prentice. 1980. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Kaufman, Chaim . 1996. Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. International Security20 (spring): 136-75.
38.
Khong, Yuen Foong . 1992. Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Klein, J. P. , and Melvin L. Moeschberger. 1997. Survival analysis techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
40.
Lai, Brian , and Dan Reiter. 2000. Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (April): 203-27.
41.
Leeds, Brett Ashley . 1999. Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science43 (October): 979-1002.
42.
Lektzian, David , and Mark Souva. 2001. Institutions and international cooperation: An event history analysis of economic sanctions. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (February): 61-79.
43.
Linderman, Gerald F.1974. The mirror of war: American society and the Spanish-American War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
44.
Meek, Curtis. 2001. The duration of civil wars. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University.
45.
Owen, John M. IV . 1997. Liberal peace, liberal war: American politics and international security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46.
Raknerud, Arvid , and Håvard Hegre. 1997. The hazard of war: Reassessing the evidence for the democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research34 (4): 385-404.
47.
Reed, William . 1997. Alliance duration and democracy: An extension and cross-validation of "Democratic states and commitment in international relations."American Journal of Political Science41 (July): 1072-78.
48.
Regan, Patrick M.1999. Civil wars and foreign powers: Outside intervention in intrastate conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
49.
--- 2002. Third party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (February): 55-73.
50.
Regan, Patrick M. , and Allan C. Stam. 2000. In the nick of time: Conflict management, mediation timing, and the duration of interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly44 (June): 239-60.
51.
Reiter, Dan . 1996. Crucible of beliefs: Learning, alliances, and world wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
--- 2001. Does peace nurture democracy?Journal of Politics63 (August): 935-48.
53.
Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
54.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas . 1996. Collective identity in a democratic community: The case of NATO. In The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 357-99. New York: Columbia University Press.
55.
Schemper, Michael . 1992. Cox analysis of survival data with nonproportional hazard functions. The Statistician41:455-65.
56.
Smith, Alastair , and Allan Stam. 2001. Bargaining through conflict. Presented at the Political Economy of Conflict Conference, March 23-24, Yale University.
57.
Teachman, J. D. , and M. D. Hayward. 1993. Interpreting hazard rate models. Sociological Methods and Research21 (3): 340-71.
58.
Walter, Barbara F.2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Wendt, Alexander . 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Werner, Suzanne . 1999. The precarious nature of peace: Resolving the issues, enforcing the settlement, and renegotiating the terms. American Journal of Political Science43 (July): 912-34.
61.
--- 2000. The effects of political similarity on the onset of militarized disputes, 1816-1985. Political Research Quarterly53 (June): 343-74.
62.
White, Halbert . 1980. A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica48:817-38.
63.
Zartman, I. William . 1989. Ripe for resolution: Conflict and intervention in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Zorn, Christopher . 2000. Modeling duration dependence. Political Analysis8(4): 367-80.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
