Integrative complexity signifies the complexity of conceptual and cognitive rules that people use in processing information. People with high complexity take diverse approaches in evaluating situations and making decisions, and those with low integrative complexity rely on simplistic and dichotomous reasoning. An integrative complexity coding scheme is used to analyze correspondences exchanged between South and North Korea. Time-series models are used to predict mean levels of integrative complexity in South and North Korea for each half-year period between 1984 and 1994. Results show that trends in South-North Korean relations exert significant influence on integrative complexity levels, and major coordinative events are associated with a decline in complexity in the following half-year period. During presidential elections in South Korea, complexity levels decline in both South and North Korea.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, J. W. , and G. H. Litwin. 1960. Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60:52-63.
2.
Axelrod, R.1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Azar, E.1990. The management of protracted social conflict. Hampshire: Dartmouth.
4.
Baker-Brown, G. , E. J. Ballard, S. Bluck, B. de Vries, P. Suedfeld, and P. E. Tetlock. 1992. The conceptual integrative complexity scoring manual. In Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis, edited by C. P. Smith, 400-418. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cha, V.1997. Korean unification: The zero-sum past and the precarious future. Asian Perspective21:63-92.
6.
Choi, K.1996. Inter-Korean confidence-building. Asian Perspective20:21-43.
7.
Driver, M. J.1965. A structural analysis of aggression, stress, and personality in an inter-nation simulation. Institute Paper No. 97, Purdue University, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Lafayette, IN.
8.
Feather, N. T.1961. The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology63:552-561.
9.
Hahm, S. D.1999. A study of Korean presidents. Seoul: Nanam (in Korean).
10.
Han, S.-K. 1994. South Korea's reunification policy: Content analysis and development policy. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University (in Korean).
11.
Harvey, O. J. , D. E. Hunt, and H. M. Schroder. 1961. Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Hermann, M. G.1980. Assessing the personalities of Soviet politburo members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin6:332-352.
13.
Heyns, R. Q. , J. Veroff, and F. W. Atkinson. 1958. A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In Motives in fantasy, action and society, edited by J. W. Atkinson, 205-218. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
14.
Hunt, S. M. 1972. A comparison and validation of two thematic apperceptive measures of the need for power. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
15.
Koestner, R. , and D. C. McClelland. 1992. The affiliation motive. In Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis, edited by C. P. Smith, 205-223. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Kim, J.-H. , J.-S. Koo, and J. Han. 1999. Predictors of integrative complexity expressed in North-South newspaper articles. Communication and Society25:139-173 (in Korean).
17.
Koo, J.-S. , and J.-H. Kim.1999. Integrative complexity of daily newspaper periodicals and party newspapers: The effects of economic crisis and political shift on integrative complexity. Korean Journal of Psychology: Social Psychology and Personality13:35-52 (in Korean).
18.
Levi, A. , and P. E. Tetlock. 1980. A cognitive analysis of Japan's 1941 decision for war. Journal of Conflict Resolution24:195-211.
19.
McClelland, D. C.1961. The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
20.
McClelland, D. C.1971. Motivational trends in society. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21.
McClelland, D. C.1985. Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
22.
Osgood, C. E.1962. An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
Porter, C. A. , and P. Suedfeld. 1981. Integrative complexity in the correspondence of literary figures: Effects of personal and societal stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40:321-330.
24.
Raphael, T.1982. Integrative complexity theory and forecasting international crises, 1946-1962. Journal of Conflict Resolution26:436-450.
25.
Roh, J.-S.1994. Reunification policy of South and North Korea and 50 years of reunification movement. Seoul: Sagyejeol (in Korean).
26.
Schroder, H. M. , M. J. Driver, and S. Streufert. 1967. Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
Streufert, S. , and S. Streufert. 1978. Behavior in the complete environment. Washington, DC: Winston.
28.
Suedfeld, P. , and A. D. Rank. 1976. Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology34:169-178.
29.
Suedfeld, P. , and P. E. Tetlock. 1977. Integrative complexity of communication in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution21:169-184.
30.
Suedfeld, P. , P. E. Tetlock, and C. Ramirez. 1977. War, peace and integrative complexity. Journal of Conflict Resolution21:427-442.
31.
Terhune, K. W.1968. Motives, situation and interpersonal conflict within prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology8 (Pt. 2, Monograph Suppl.).
32.
Tetlock, P. E.1979. Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37:1314-1324.
33.
Tetlock, P. E.1981a. Pre- to post-election shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41:207-212.
34.
Tetlock, P. E.1981b. Personality and isolationism: Content analysis of senatorial speeches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41:737-743.
35.
Tetlock, P. E.1983. Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45:118-126.
36.
Tetlock, P. E.1985. Integrative complexity of American and Soviet foreign policy rhetoric: A time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49:1565-1585.
37.
Veroff, F.1992. Power motivation. In Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis, edited by C. P. Smith, 278-300. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Walker, S. G. , and G. L. Watson. 1994. Integrative complexity and British decisions during the Munich and Polish crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution38:3-23.
39.
Wallace, M. D. , P. Suedfeld, and K. Thachuk. 1996. Failed leader or successful peacemaker? Crisis, behavior, and the cognitive processes of Mikhail Sergeyevitch Gorbachev. Political Psychology17 (3): 453-472.
40.
Yoo, S.-H.1996. North Korea in 1996. Monthly Reunified Economy13:2-3 (in Korean).
